Started By
Message
re: (Spinoff) tBig 7: Should Aggies Big 12 Title be Considered?
Posted on 6/12/13 at 3:29 pm to USMC Gators
Posted on 6/12/13 at 3:29 pm to USMC Gators
so we actually had a winning record before 2008 Fulmer 2009 Kiffin then Dooley debacle 
0
Posted on 6/12/13 at 3:40 pm to undecided
No.....the big 12 does not = the SEC so they do not meet the critia for Big 6 membership
Posted on 6/12/13 at 4:00 pm to undecided
frick no.
I wouldn't give a shite if USC with all their trophies and records left the PAC and came to the SEC. If you haven't won the SECCG there will be no expansion to The Big 7.
It's simple, Win it and we'll make room for you at the table.
I wouldn't give a shite if USC with all their trophies and records left the PAC and came to the SEC. If you haven't won the SECCG there will be no expansion to The Big 7.
It's simple, Win it and we'll make room for you at the table.
Posted on 6/12/13 at 4:01 pm to undecided
quote:
Which speaks to my larger point that Aggies need to strike while the iron is hot before Texas finds (or hires) their Saban
Why would that matter since we already hired someone better than Saban? It isn't like we have this guy.
Posted on 6/12/13 at 4:03 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
Why would that matter since we already hired someone better than Saban? It isn't like we have this guy.
Posted on 6/12/13 at 4:20 pm to USMC Gators
I just skimmed this a bit, but I LMAO at someone's idea that Ole Miss has a "post WWII" national title when all Ole Miss has is a couple years where some computer poll named them number 1, while A&M has an actual AP Poll national title in 1939 conveniently right before the timeframe mentioned.
Posted on 6/12/13 at 4:22 pm to JJxvi
They got the FWAA and were the only undefeated team in 1960.
Posted on 6/12/13 at 4:34 pm to TeLeFaWx
you're a quality troll, troll.
Posted on 6/12/13 at 5:21 pm to thatdude1985
quote:
you're a quality troll, troll.
I don't troll.
Posted on 6/12/13 at 5:30 pm to TeLeFaWx
but do you flop?
Posted on 6/12/13 at 5:59 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
I don't troll.
I suppose you're right. It was trolling before it got boring and repetitive.
Posted on 6/12/13 at 6:06 pm to cyde
quote:
I suppose you're right. It was trolling before it got boring and repetitive.
I like you.
Posted on 6/12/13 at 6:07 pm to cyde
This isn't a hard question.
The "Big 6" is an arbitrary designation, grouping the six teams that have won an SEC championship since the inception of 12 teams and a conference championship game. A&M hasn't done that.
If you want to start using a different set of criteria, then add A&M. You just need to explain then what the criteria is and why the other 7 teams don't qualify.
The "Big 6" is an arbitrary designation, grouping the six teams that have won an SEC championship since the inception of 12 teams and a conference championship game. A&M hasn't done that.
If you want to start using a different set of criteria, then add A&M. You just need to explain then what the criteria is and why the other 7 teams don't qualify.
Posted on 6/12/13 at 6:09 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
I like you.
Posted on 6/12/13 at 6:18 pm to undecided
Forget about whether TAM should be considered part of a Big 7, they are already a member of the Big-5
TAM already has a recruiting progam going forward equal to LSU and Florida, and just behind Bama.
They should have won the SEC West last year except for a good ole boy bridge schedule for Bama.
SEC Pecking order
Bama
Florida and LSU
TAM
Georgia
USCar
Ole Miss, Aubrun, Arkansas
Miss. St., Tennessee, Missiouri, Kentucky, and Vanderbilt.
The idea Tennessee is big at anything other than losing is laughable.
TAM already has a recruiting progam going forward equal to LSU and Florida, and just behind Bama.
They should have won the SEC West last year except for a good ole boy bridge schedule for Bama.
SEC Pecking order
Bama
Florida and LSU
TAM
Georgia
USCar
Ole Miss, Aubrun, Arkansas
Miss. St., Tennessee, Missiouri, Kentucky, and Vanderbilt.
The idea Tennessee is big at anything other than losing is laughable.
This post was edited on 6/12/13 at 6:20 pm
Posted on 6/12/13 at 6:21 pm to Sheetbend
quote:
Forget about whether TAM should be considered part of a Big 7, they are already a member of the Big-5
TAM already has a recruiting progam going forward equal to LSU and Florida, and just behind Bama.
They should have won the SEC West last year except for a good ole boy bridge schedule for Bama.
SEC Pecking order
Bama
Florida and LSU
TAM
Georgia
USCar
Ole Miss, Aubrun, Arkansas
Miss. St., Tennessee, Missiouri, Kentucky, and Vanderbilt.
The idea Tennessee is big at anything other than losing is laughable.
I think you're my favorite B1G poster.
Posted on 6/12/13 at 6:22 pm to undecided
no
Posted on 6/12/13 at 6:22 pm to Sheetbend
quote:
They should have won the SEC West last year except for a good ole boy bridge schedule for Bama
Posted on 6/12/13 at 6:29 pm to Sheetbend
quote:
Sheetbend
Posted on 6/12/13 at 6:30 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:
This isn't a hard question.
The "Big 6" is an arbitrary designation, grouping the six teams that have won an SEC championship since the inception of 12 teams and a conference championship game. A&M hasn't done that.
If you want to start using a different set of criteria, then add A&M. You just need to explain then what the criteria is and why the other 7 teams don't qualify.
So only teams that have won an SEC title game then?
Page 9 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News