Started By
Message
South Carolina too poor to fire Lamont Paris
Posted on 3/10/26 at 10:17 am
Posted on 3/10/26 at 10:17 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. *5 wins in his last 35 SEC games.
*5-30 overall against top 25 teams (1-20 last 2 yrs).
*Overall winning % of .477 is worst in 100 years
Guess we are saving our money for Paul and Shane’s buyouts
This post was edited on 3/10/26 at 10:21 am
Posted on 3/10/26 at 10:29 am to CarolinaGamecock99
quote:
Lamont Paris
Is that a porn name?
Posted on 3/10/26 at 10:32 am to TigerLunatik
Nah. His mom was a fan of Sanford and Son...
Posted on 3/10/26 at 10:38 am to CarolinaGamecock99
Can't spell South Caroline without POURS. Beamer is a nice man as well.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 10:40 am to Serraneaux
quote:
Can't spell South Caroline without POURS

Posted on 3/10/26 at 10:42 am to CarolinaGamecock99
Damn. South Carolina is down bad in every sport except womens hoops
Posted on 3/10/26 at 10:57 am to Lonnie Utah
quote:
His mom was a fan of Sanford and Son...
That was the other thing that popped into my brain.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 10:59 am to CarolinaGamecock99
Truly in the running for worst P4 athletic department
Posted on 3/10/26 at 11:04 am to CarolinaGamecock99
Don't feel bad. LSU is in the same boat.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 11:23 am to ruffleforeskin
Damn. South Carolina is down bad in every sport except womens hoops
Very true but at least they got that, I don’t like dawn or womens bball but it’s great brand recognition, those womens bball titles were the third most watched college championships of their respective years.
Very true but at least they got that, I don’t like dawn or womens bball but it’s great brand recognition, those womens bball titles were the third most watched college championships of their respective years.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 11:26 am to TigerLunatik
quote:
Is that a porn name?
South Carolina's version of One Night In Paris.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 11:40 am to CarolinaGamecock99
$10 million to buy him out.
The AD that gave him that ridiculous contract (6 years, $26 million), which also includes an $11 million buyout, needs to not only be fired, but publicly ridiculed.
Here's to hoping that performance-based contracts with no buyouts become the new norm. Which AD is going to have the cajones to be the first?
The AD that gave him that ridiculous contract (6 years, $26 million), which also includes an $11 million buyout, needs to not only be fired, but publicly ridiculed.
Here's to hoping that performance-based contracts with no buyouts become the new norm. Which AD is going to have the cajones to be the first?
Posted on 3/10/26 at 11:50 am to CarolinaGamecock99
Teams are beginning to opt out of major sports so they can compete in other places due to NIL and money.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 1:02 pm to MIZ83
Ray Tanner. He ruined everything. He is gone now but the new AD is already making some bold (crap) moves.
Popular
Back to top

8









