Started By
Message

re: So does Bama claim 1964 National Championship?

Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:25 am to
Posted by bamawriter
Nashville, TN
Member since Apr 2009
3163 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:25 am to
quote:

You send boosters enough of the AP voters' houses with brides


Pics or GTFO.
This post was edited on 5/4/17 at 10:25 am
Posted by BammerDelendaEst
Member since Jan 2014
2212 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:25 am to
quote:

The playoff is the first system we've had that didn't rely on the wire service polls.


Instead, it relies on the subjective evaluations of a handful of committee members to choose 4 teams that get to play for the "title."

It's all about hype and TV revenue.

Unless CFB goes to a NFL-type playoff, with playoff spots based strictly on objective win-loss criteria, it's still a subjective MNC.
Posted by bamawriter
Nashville, TN
Member since Apr 2009
3163 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:28 am to
quote:

with playoff spots based strictly on objective win-loss criteria,


Which is impossible given the number of eligible teams and the limited number of games that can be played. You could take only conference champs, but you'd have to eliminate a conference first so that we only have 4 available. Otherwise we're still applying subjective criteria.
Posted by Rabern57
Alabama
Member since Jan 2010
13364 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Unless CFB goes to a NFL-type playoff, with playoff spots based strictly on objective win-loss criteria, it's still a subjective MNC.


They would have to cut alot of teams to have a full playoff.
Posted by Bankshot
Member since Jun 2006
5375 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:31 am to
I don't understand people freaking out about the AP and UPI championships awarded pre 1970's when bowl games were basically just considered bonus games. There were a lot fewer bowl games and not all of the good teams went to bowls every year. The Big 10 only allowed its champion to go a bowl (Rose Bowl) until 1975.
Posted by 1BamaRTR
In Your Head Blvd
Member since Apr 2015
22536 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:32 am to
quote:


So we taking back Saban's while Bama was on probation?

Bama wasn't on a post season ban probation like AU was. That saved them from a bowl game. Using Randy Savage's logic, OSU played and won their bowl game so they're the real NCs of 1957.
Posted by jatebe
Queen of Links
Member since Oct 2008
18284 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 10:37 am to
quote:

That was the days of buying votes.
Yeah, Auburn bought a lot of votes for their 1957 title.

quote:

When the unbeaten season ended with a 40-0 victory over Alabama, sports information director Bill Beckwith feverishly worked the system to ensure that the Tigers had enough votes to secure The Associated Press national title.


quote:

What Auburn didn't do was convince the nation that it was the clear-cut national champion. The Tigers weren't eligible for the UPI poll because of their NCAA probation so Beckwith worked to make sure Auburn ended up on top of the AP poll.

At the time, any AP subscriber was eligible to vote in the poll. Beckwith made sure that smaller radio stations and smaller papers were aware of this, adding in his informational pitch that a vote for Auburn would be greatly appreciated. It was a loophole that the AP quickly closed -- it formed a panel of voters soon afterwards -- but it couldn't change the vote that season, much to the chagrin of Ohio State head coach Woody Hayes, who boldly questioned if Auburn had played anyone of note.


So, Auburn is the reason there is a panel of AP voters.... good job.

And I wonder how much AU paid these small radio stations?

LINK
Posted by BammerDelendaEst
Member since Jan 2014
2212 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 11:06 am to
You would have to to re-align conferences (I would say 8 instead of 4) AND enforce at least a rough equality of strength of schedule.
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
30249 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 11:51 am to
quote:

Just win more and they'll be irrelevant...

BINGO!

Posted by KiffinsVisor
Tennessee
Member since Jun 2014
1129 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 12:12 pm to
WHO CARES! We have won more than anyone else and are still winning more than anyone else is going to. Old News
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41208 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

FWAA was a major polling organization at the time


It was made of up of 5 people, two of which voted for Notre Dame in 1964.
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

There wasn't really one after it, either. The playoff is the first system we've had that didn't rely on the wire service polls.
I agree. Right now bama's national championship count stands at 1
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54731 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Except the Schula years. Even Bama fans know they sucked during those years


We are talking about claiming them, not winning them.

Tide claims all years no matter the record or probation status.
Posted by ALA2262
Cumming, GA
Member since Jun 2016
1683 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

So, Auburn is the reason there is a panel of AP voters.... good job. And I wonder how much AU paid these small radio stations? LINK


It wasn't just small radio stations and small newspapers. I had an uncle that owned a garage/service station. He was an AP subscriber and had a vote.
Page 1 2 3 4 5
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter