Started By
Message
re: Should the SEC kick out S Carolina and Missouri? It would be money for the rest of us.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 6:47 pm to KwoodTiger
Posted on 8/2/21 at 6:47 pm to KwoodTiger
I am sure ESPN has asked the SEC before to drop some programs.
0
Posted on 8/2/21 at 6:49 pm to KwoodTiger
I'm all for this cause I just now realized they were even in the conference.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 6:51 pm to KwoodTiger
This “sec kicking out” talk is absolutely retarded. Anyone who thinks this is realistic has a low IQ
Posted on 8/2/21 at 6:52 pm to KwoodTiger
Mizzou won the East more times that Carolina, Kentucky, and Vandy combined already. Big thing though is Mizzou is just now finishing up vast facility improvements. Got a whole new South Endzone with football only weight rooms, dinning, recovery polls, ect. We got a new indoor football practice facility coming next year too. Our recruiting is getting a lot better with our new coach. It hasn’t been pretty, especially with the 2015 protest, but we are finally coming out of that dark cloud and the SEC has forced us to do better bc we have been getting our asses kicked ever since Pinkel announced his finally year
Posted on 8/2/21 at 7:04 pm to KwoodTiger
No. South Carolina and Missouri both have much of their state's markets...both are excellent schools with big followings, especially S.Carolina.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 7:09 pm to KwoodTiger
quote:
SEC had to take UT and OU.
Conference is stronger for it.
And, if SEC hadn’t taken those two, then another conference would have which might have made a Pac 14 or Big 10 plus 4 a contender for top conference.
Instead, the SEC reigns supreme. But, at 16 freaking teams.
At this juncture, the question must be asked…does S Carolina and Missouri actually add any value to the SECs TV contract? Dividing up that contract by 14 teams instead of 16 might make it worth considering dumping them. And, 14 teams just more manageable.
They were only added such that the additions of Arkansas and A&M would be balanced.
The times are a changing. Just don’t know if they are really additive.
LSU couldn't beat Missouri last year! How sad you want to get rid of a team that beat your team!
Posted on 8/2/21 at 7:17 pm to KwoodTiger
Should do it like the premier league.
Bottom of the standings you get tossed.
So Arkansas you're out
Bottom of the standings you get tossed.
So Arkansas you're out
Posted on 8/2/21 at 7:29 pm to KwoodTiger
That loss last year to Mizzou really hurts you, and it makes me smile. Go cry to your Democrat Governor.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 7:32 pm to ZOUForce
S Carolina - you were invited 30 years ago b/c the SEC needed an offset for Arkansas. What have you done over that time period except hire a couple of retread football coaches?
Missouri - you’ve contributed a liberal university agenda and Michael Sam. That’s all I’ve got. You should thank A&M daily for your good fortune.
Don’t think either are worth $75-80MM per year.
You both are takers.
Missouri - you’ve contributed a liberal university agenda and Michael Sam. That’s all I’ve got. You should thank A&M daily for your good fortune.
Don’t think either are worth $75-80MM per year.
You both are takers.
This post was edited on 8/2/21 at 7:33 pm
Posted on 8/2/21 at 7:35 pm to KwoodTiger
USCe at least brings fine women to the table
Missouri brings this…
Missouri brings this…
Posted on 8/2/21 at 7:36 pm to KwoodTiger
quote:
you’ve contributed a liberal university agenda
Look in the mirror corndog
Posted on 8/2/21 at 7:37 pm to KwoodTiger
quote:If LSU didn't lose to Missouri maybe you would have a point!
S Carolina - you were invited 30 years ago b/c the SEC needed an offset for Arkansas. What have you done over that time period except hire a couple of retread football coaches?
Missouri - you’ve contributed a liberal university agenda and Michael Sam. That’s all I’ve got. You should thank A&M daily for your good fortune.
Don’t think either are worth $75-80MM per year.
You both are takers.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 8:19 pm to SCgamecock2988
You want another man to eat your *ss?!
Posted on 8/2/21 at 8:26 pm to KwoodTiger
At least those two teams have played in the SEC Championship. I could think of one expansion team who’s never really been close
Posted on 8/2/21 at 8:34 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Vandy and Mizzou should walk the plank.
This
Posted on 8/2/21 at 8:34 pm to KwoodTiger
I can see SC but Missouri added the STL and KC markets. You can't find a team that can replace those numbers.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 8:49 pm to KwoodTiger
First off nobody cares what you think. These stupid posts are old.
Secondly, you Texas and OU fans chiming in are extremely annoying. STFU and sit in the corner. Nobody cares what you think either.
Secondly, you Texas and OU fans chiming in are extremely annoying. STFU and sit in the corner. Nobody cares what you think either.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 8:51 pm to KwoodTiger
That’s coming. Pay for performance.
Texas will get credit for SEC churn, A&M will cry about it while their palms turn green.
Texas will get credit for SEC churn, A&M will cry about it while their palms turn green.
Posted on 8/2/21 at 9:15 pm to Miznoz
You're an idiot
Posted on 8/2/21 at 10:47 pm to Bayou Bengal 730
quote:
I say kick out TX And A&M! Already sick of their crap. They will take over all TD forums. All I do is lurk and it’s not enjoyable anymore.
Seriously. They need to get a room. Sadomasochism is not for the public to see.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News