Started By
Message
re: Should Oklahoma or Clemson have been left out of the top 4?
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:24 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:24 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Bama out. UCF in.
Why?
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:24 pm to Masterag
Go read the entire description and guidelines of the committee and its purpose, fool.
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:25 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Bama out. UCF in.
This
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:25 pm to ColoBama
UCF were undefeated and won their conference
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:25 pm to Masterag
quote:
Bama out. UCF in.
This
Can you give a reason why? Otherwise, I'll just have to assume it's because you *feel* that way.
No judgment from me man but just own that shite.
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:26 pm to Gatorbait2008
Oklahoma was pretty damn close to stellar
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:26 pm to Masterag
quote:
UCF were undefeated and won their conference
Is that in the rules? You must be undefeated and win your conference? If so, they'd be the only team in.
Think it through.
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:27 pm to ColoBama
With the benefit of hindsight, Ohio State was probably better at the end of the season than Clemson was, but that swap wasn’t going to happen.
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:27 pm to ColoBama
I think Clemson would have been ranked about 5th in the old BCS system. No way they would have been a top 3 team 5 years ago with a terrible loss to Syracuse. Oklahoma would probably been number 1 with Georgia maybe number 2. Makes the loss last night even more difficult, but what you gonna do?
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:27 pm to ColoBama
TBH, when the brackets were announced, I was thrilled that Bama got in but felt that OK was gonna win it all. Pulled like hell for the Dawgs against OK.
The win over Clemson was cathartic for me, much like the ND win in Miami.
Helluva game last night, great showcase for the SEC.
The win over Clemson was cathartic for me, much like the ND win in Miami.
Helluva game last night, great showcase for the SEC.
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:28 pm to BossDawg2424
quote:
I think Clemson would have been ranked about 5th in the old BCS system. No way they would have been a top 3 team 5 years ago with a terrible loss to Syracuse. Oklahoma would probably been number 1 with Georgia maybe number 2. Makes the loss last night even more difficult, but what you gonna do?
Good point. But, if you look at 2014, it would have been Bama and Florida St in the BCSNCG.
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:30 pm to FT
quote:
With the benefit of hindsight, Ohio State was probably better at the end of the season than Clemson was, but that swap wasn’t going to happen.
Exactly but only with hindsight. No one knew that when Ohio St beat USC.
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:31 pm to ColoBama
Sorry Colo, didn’t mean to down vote your post. Damn fat thumbs on the iPhone made me do it. Wish there was a way to correct that.
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:33 pm to Masterag
quote:
I'll give you two: 1. You didn't win the SEC West 2. You didn't win the SEC
Those are not requirements to be a part of anything at all, let alone the playoffs.
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:33 pm to BossDawg2424
quote:
Sorry Colo, didn’t mean to down vote your post. Damn fat thumbs on the iPhone made me do it. Wish there was a way to correct that.
Eh I probably deserved it for being a jackass today
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:38 pm to ColoBama
If I were making a top 25, my top 5 would be Bama, Georgia, Oklahoma, Ohio State, Clemson.
Posted on 1/9/18 at 5:39 pm to artompkins
Neither is playing in a P5 conference.
Posted on 1/9/18 at 7:34 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Sounds like you are some SJW stumping for UCF. Their schedule is beyond pathetic and would not otherwise even deserve consideration had they rescheduled Tech, let alone without them.
Posted on 1/9/18 at 7:41 pm to artompkins
Clempzun NO Okie, at two losse-5 or 6 oh and Carolina not in top 25-bullshite.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News