Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Should Auburn RB Stats get the "System RB" Asterisk?

Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:18 pm
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37706 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:18 pm
While in control of Auburn's offense, Gus Malzahn has provided the SEC leading rusher in 3/5 years and a top 3 rusher for every year of his tenure. All this despite having some poor OLs some years.

With the BEST scheming/IQ coach in CFB, should these crazy stats thrown up by these RBs have an asterisk similar to Graham Harrell or Case Keenum?

2009- Ben Tate #3
2010- Cam Newton #1
2011- Mike Dyer #2
2013- Tre Mason #1
2014 Cam Artis-Payne #1


This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 3:24 pm
Posted by CrimsonChin
the gutter.
Member since Feb 2010
5857 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:19 pm to
I think it may be fair.
Posted by AA7
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2009
26685 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:21 pm to
Probably. They have the benefit of having the best scheming coach in CFB.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79128 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:28 pm to
I think there is a pretty good possibility all prove themselves independently, which would be a pretty strong record.

Tate and Cam have already, and Tre is well on his way.
Posted by Tigerman97
Member since Jun 2014
10354 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:28 pm to
There success in the NFL is the reason the asterisk is never mentioned. Dyer's success at Louisville also factors into the equation.
This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 3:29 pm
Posted by Gary Busey
Member since Dec 2014
33277 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:28 pm to
Their stats should only count when they played 9+ winning team and when Auburn is good. Amidoingitrite?
Posted by TheMightyTerrier
Member since Nov 2010
2099 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:32 pm to
I think you could argue this about most running backs on most teams. Most of them are only as good as their offensive linemen and many benefit from a good QB (fewer stacked boxes, etc.).

Your Petersons, Sanders, Browns, and Paytons, who would be great on any team, are few and far between.
Posted by gatortrav88
Member since Oct 2014
3807 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:35 pm to
tate has had an ok career in the nfl at best i know he's had his fair share of 100 yard games but has he had a good season?

i dont think artis payne is anything special either

tre mason was a monster last yr and he's been really good his rookie yr
This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 3:36 pm
Posted by brodieneedsanol
Member since Jun 2011
373 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:38 pm to
fair question, but as previously mentioned, tate, cam and mason have all proven themselves outside of gus. despite his numbers this year, i think cap was definitely the weakest of all those mentioned. au unfortunately upgrades next year at rb
Posted by Sabear
Spring Hill, TN
Member since Nov 2014
270 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:38 pm to
You can definitely apply it to Artis-Payne, but Tre Mason is the real deal. He would have put up monster numbers in Bama's offense as well.
Posted by Aman
Alabama
Member since Mar 2010
5181 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

i dont think artis payne is anything special either


Artis Payne quite simply is not that good compared to the others on that list. Put him in a traditional pro style offense and he wouldn't sniff 1,000 yards.
Posted by AUbagman
LA
Member since Jun 2014
10565 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:42 pm to
Some preseason predictions, some actually pretty good and some definite lulz:

LINK
This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 3:44 pm
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79128 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

tate has had an ok career in the nfl at best i know he's had his fair share of 100 yard games but has he had a good season?

i dont think artis payne is anything special either

tre mason was a monster last yr and he's been really good his rookie yr


Any RB who puts together solid numbers in the NFL has made it IMO. Tate was, and potentially still could be, a solid NFL running back.

No idea on Artis-Payne, but he is a workman like back and sometimes guys like that excel in the league.
Posted by RangerRicky
Member since Dec 2014
347 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:47 pm to
Probably fair, although Tre and Cam are having success in the NFL.

Being a "system RB" isn't necessarily a bad thing.
Posted by BowlJackson
Birmingham, AL
Member since Sep 2013
52881 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:52 pm to
You cannot "definitely" apply that label to CAP. You have to give him a chance to prove himself. CAP is sturdy and a workhorse of a power back with a good spin move like Lacey. He probably won't be a star at the next level but he could be a solid #2, change of pace or 3rd down back.

Remember a lot of people said Mason was average and a product of the system last season.
Posted by RangerRicky
Member since Dec 2014
347 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

Remember a lot of people said Mason was average and a product of the system last season.


Let's slow down on Mason. Remember Trent Richardson had better stats than Mason in his rookie season and look where he is now.
Posted by kage
ATL
Member since Feb 2010
4068 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

I think you could argue this about most running backs on most teams. Most of them are only as good as their offensive linemen.


There are very few RB's that put up great numbers that don't run behind great OL's.

I think you can apply this to Ingram and Richardson from bama. They both had fantastic college careers, but have struggled in the NFL, and the OL's they've been running behind haven't been bad by any means. Lacy is the best of all of the three in the NFL to date, and had the "worst" best year of all of them. They all ran behind some very strong bama OL's.
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 4:08 pm to
In slight defense of TR, he is playing behind one of the worst OLs in the NFL. There is a good likely hood that Luck is going to get killed before the end of the season.

Having said that, Mason has always been legit. Barring injury he will have a long and successful career in the league. Tate is also a legit NFL back. CAP may be the only one who could possibly be called a system back.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter