Started By
Message
re: Sheridan is dropping bombs on Finebaum right now...
Posted on 7/20/11 at 3:36 pm to Alahunter
Posted on 7/20/11 at 3:36 pm to Alahunter
quote:I've already said it is possible it is true. I've also explained what my doubts are. I've never once called him a homer and have repeatedly complimented him. I just don't think he would be the one with inside info on the NCAA investigation and that it would be breaking on FB in this manner. This reminds me of countless FB segments that get everyone in a frenzy. Again, maybe he does know. Sheridan has lots of connections around CFB and CFB media.
To you, and to WDE, who says they doubt what he said..
0
Posted on 7/20/11 at 3:36 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
BlackHelicopterPilot
.... I love you.
Posted on 7/20/11 at 3:36 pm to TiggerWoods
quote:
I love how everyone thinks Sheridan is a credible source on Auburn.
No one's claiming he's a credible source on Auburn. But, if he has contacts on the NCAA's staff, then he's got credible sources pertaining to the NCAA's investigation of AU.
Posted on 7/20/11 at 3:36 pm to chilld28
quote:
You live on posting second hand info everytime you put up the Bunker's opinion on which way a recruit is leaning. That is the same thing, isnt it??
I'm not a member of the bunker.
Posted on 7/20/11 at 3:36 pm to Alahunter
quote:
and reputable analysts with established contacts saying they know a specific allegation.
Like Joe Schad and his sources saying they had Cam on tape?
Posted on 7/20/11 at 3:37 pm to mckibaj
Lol, ok. No more trying to be reasonable. I tried it sort of as an experiment in this thread, but it failed miserably.
With that said, Aubies:
Heard it from a friend who
Heard it from a friend who
Heard it from another you been messin' around.
With that said, Aubies:
Heard it from a friend who
Heard it from a friend who
Heard it from another you been messin' around.
Posted on 7/20/11 at 3:37 pm to crimsonsaint
There is no use trying to explain. If they say anything about Auburn, they are not credible. Even when the NCAA comes out if they do anything, some still wont believe it.
Posted on 7/20/11 at 3:37 pm to Alahunter
quote:I thought he said a source that has been credible on NCAA matters for 25 years, but didn't say the source was in the NCAA. Which is it?
saying it came directly from a source in the NCAA.
Posted on 7/20/11 at 3:38 pm to chilld28
quote:
Even when the NCAA comes out if they do anything, some still wont believe it.
You know how many other fans won't believe the NCAA if they come out and say Cam wasn't paid?
Posted on 7/20/11 at 3:38 pm to chilld28
quote:
Even when the NCAA comes out if they do anything
That's all we've said the entire time...
Posted on 7/20/11 at 3:38 pm to audodger
I simply stated what he said. The NCAA alleged to him that a wealthy Au booster paid Cecil.
That has nothing to do with proof or if he has it. The NCAA may have it and hasn't given that to him. You've never seen organizations leak tidbits of information to flush out more information or create a panic to see what comes scurrying out?
That has nothing to do with proof or if he has it. The NCAA may have it and hasn't given that to him. You've never seen organizations leak tidbits of information to flush out more information or create a panic to see what comes scurrying out?
Posted on 7/20/11 at 3:38 pm to Alahunter
quote:
If Sheridan said that about Bama, I, as a fan would be very uneasy and certainly not saying he's a hack.
Sheridan isn't that stupid. He likes salads.
quote:
There are some things you can dismiss easily.. such as the Jerrell Harris packet, as being nutcase accusations
I agree.
quote:
There are other things, such as NCAA investigations and reputable analysts with established contacts saying they know a specific allegation.
Again, I agree. I'll start worrying when you come up with the reputable part. And when resume of the supposed contact stops morphing.
Posted on 7/20/11 at 3:39 pm to Alahunter
maybe - but lets be honest - its basically the same shite - different week. slap a different name on the "whistleblower" and reword the same information and keep the desperate, conspiracy theorists happy - its ingenious.
granted the latest about the NCAA stuff is new to be outed - however everyone knew it was happening anyway.
granted the latest about the NCAA stuff is new to be outed - however everyone knew it was happening anyway.
Posted on 7/20/11 at 3:39 pm to Alahunter
quote:
The NCAA alleged to him that a wealthy Au booster paid Cecil.
How would the NCAA know that a wealthy AU booster paid Cecil without evidence?
Posted on 7/20/11 at 3:39 pm to blzr
Im guessing the few select ones that wear orange and blue 
Posted on 7/20/11 at 3:39 pm to RT1941
quote:
Danny's trying to out scoop Yahoo?
I don't think scoop is the word. I'm saying all we hear from media members was it was over, or we haven't heard anything new, or there is a lot of theories or what ever out there. With Danny it's just the opposite. Put him behind a microphone and he just starts throwing out definites.
Don't forget who he is. He is an odds maker. He puts out some doom and gloom about AU and people start betting against them.. but he also saying he thinks AU is gonna win more games than expected... Either way someone is gonna make a shite ton of money off of AU this year.
Posted on 7/20/11 at 3:39 pm to Thracken13
Wonder if Sheridan's website is getting a bump in hits?
Posted on 7/20/11 at 3:40 pm to crimsonsaint
quote:
he has contacts on the NCAA's staff
And now we've morphed BACK into being ON staff.
Posted on 7/20/11 at 3:40 pm to Thracken13
You know how many times Danny Sheridan's name has been Googled since he started this?
Posted on 7/20/11 at 3:40 pm to WDE24
quote:
I thought he said a source that has been credible on NCAA matters for 25 years, but didn't say the source was in the NCAA. Which is it?
Sheridan - I am not alleging it. The NCAA is alleging a wealthy Au booster paid Cecil.
paraphrased, but unmistakingly the full intent of what he said.
Page 15 of 53
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News