Started By
Message
re: SEC officials: penalty should have been called on Dial
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:57 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:57 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
Bunch of dumbfricks. They will be here soon being dumbfricks I am sure.
quote:
Tiger n Miami AU83
Until then you've got it covered I see.
0
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:59 pm to bbap
Interesting that the same group of referees that you and your colleagues have been SCREAMING are paid off by Bama and cheat for us, are now the definitive source for what defines "helmet to helmet".
Out of curiosity, where do you go when you want someone to define "holding" for you?
Out of curiosity, where do you go when you want someone to define "holding" for you?
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:02 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:
Interesting that the same group of referees that you and your colleagues have been SCREAMING are paid off by Bama and cheat for us, are now the definitive source for what defines "helmet to helmet".
Out of curiosity, where do you go when you want someone to define "holding" for you?
Go fight your strawman. I have never said that and you can't defend what you wrote because it is patently false, so you tried to shift the ground.
Here's the bottom line, jack, what you wrote was horseshite and is not based on the rule book or practice or precedent. Sour news for ya, I know.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:02 pm to Crimson Legend
im not sure if your question is rhetorical in nature since for some reason you laughed at your own post or if you wanted me to actually answer that.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:04 pm to genro
quote:
What we're talking about is the fricks in here who think he should be suspended.
You are truly a stupid frick, he should be suspended. Period. It was a dirty shot, he knew it, didn't have to do it, but did it anyway. frick him and the bama fans that think this was ok.
I for one hope Teo Plants Mccryin in the CG and he leaves on a stretcher, he won't because he has to much class, unlike bama players.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:07 pm to therick711
What I wrote is that it is not helmet to helmet, and it is not, and until a definitive source specifically says that it is, I don't believe it. By the way, a "definitive source" is not a group of LSU fans with sore vaginas who live only to try to argue with Bama fans. You can watch the bowl games from your swamp and kiss my arse.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:10 pm to Crimson Legend
I'd also like to add a further rebuttal:
frick you, we're the SEC champs, and you're not. And we are the defending national champs, and you're not.
HA frickING HA. Asswipe.
frick you, we're the SEC champs, and you're not. And we are the defending national champs, and you're not.
HA frickING HA. Asswipe.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:10 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:
What I wrote is that it is not helmet to helmet, and it is not, and until a definitive source specifically says that it is, I don't believe it
quote:
You can watch the bowl games from your swamp and kiss my arse.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:10 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:
What I wrote is that it is not helmet to helmet, and it is not, and until a definitive source specifically says that it is, I don't believe it. By the way, a "definitive source" is not a group of LSU fans with sore vaginas who live only to try to argue with Bama fans. You can watch the bowl games from your swamp and kiss my arse.
Funny that you attack because you know you just completely made something up.
I like your posts, but trying to pass off something you literally completely fabricated from the top of your head as authoritative strikes me as terminally intellectually dishonest. Even for a fan message board. Come on, man.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:13 pm to therick711
Actually, I'm not really responding to you, it's more the part of the collective LSU fanbase who just keep starting this shite over and over and over.
I honestly don't believe it is helmet to helmet, and I haven't seen anything that says otherwise. I did read two articles which say it was a personal foul, and I can accept that. But the sections quoted didn't indicate anything that would lead anyone to conclude that Dial led with the crown of his helmet.
I honestly don't believe it is helmet to helmet, and I haven't seen anything that says otherwise. I did read two articles which say it was a personal foul, and I can accept that. But the sections quoted didn't indicate anything that would lead anyone to conclude that Dial led with the crown of his helmet.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:15 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:
Actually, I'm not really responding to you,
Understood. If you keep hitting reply to my posts, I'm sure you can understand why I would think you are calling me out.
Also, I'm glad you at least admit that the quoted portion I responded to was completely made up.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:18 pm to therick711
I don't know which quoted part you're talking about. If you're talking about my definition of helmet to helmet, then all I am saying is that the crown of his helmet didn't lead...which is my understanding of "helmet to helmet".
HOWEVER, there is a rule that states that you cannot hit a defenseless player above the shoulders, and in that rule it doesn't matter whether you lead with the helmet or forearm or shoulder. I can accept that this rule was violated, though I didn't realize until now that a QB is considered defenseless after an interception.
HOWEVER, there is a rule that states that you cannot hit a defenseless player above the shoulders, and in that rule it doesn't matter whether you lead with the helmet or forearm or shoulder. I can accept that this rule was violated, though I didn't realize until now that a QB is considered defenseless after an interception.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:20 pm to Crimson Legend
so, a helmet to helmet hit is NOT a "helmet to helmet" hit?
gumps gonna gump, i guess.
gumps gonna gump, i guess.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:23 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:
HOWEVER, it is NOT "helmet to helmet". Anyone who continues to say that he hit Murray with the crown of his helmet needs to calm down and watch the clip. Just because two helmets make contact does not mean it must have been a "helmet to helmet" hit, because you can't hit someone with the crown of your helmet when it is turned sideways.
Then why is Dial's helmet in Murray's ear hole?
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:24 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:
What I wrote is that it is not helmet to helmet, and it is not, and until a definitive source specifically says that it is, I don't believe it. By the way, a "definitive source" is not a group of LSU fans with sore vaginas who live only to try to argue with Bama fans. You can watch the bowl games from your swamp and kiss my arse.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:25 pm to LSUdm21
Also, Reid didn't intercept that ball. Look at the other pictures !*&#&*(^#&*#^
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:27 pm to wadewilson
quote:
They'd be doing NFL-bound players a favor.
There's no excuse anymore, everybody knows what happens to your head after you've taken hits like that your whole life.
What are you going to do for running backs, lineman, linebackers etc who take infinitely more hits to the head than any QB.
Contact to the head is part of the game, that is why they wear helemts.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:29 pm to Interweb Cowboy
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:30 pm to Interweb Cowboy
quote:
What are you going to do for running backs, lineman, linebackers etc who take infinitely more hits to the head than any QB.
Contact to the head is part of the game, that is why they wear helemts.
Y'all really are some stupid mother frickers.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:31 pm to LSUdm21
No, the stupid people are the ones that cant realize that it was a legal play.
Page 16 of 25
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News