Started By
Message

re: SEC goes 3-0 daggers the heart of the ACC ....

Posted on 9/5/17 at 5:50 pm to
Posted by 19812016
Member since Jul 2017
1172 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 5:50 pm to
What part are you not understanding? There was nothing but orange in the stadium, the team that calls themselves cocks were trying to get their cars to start
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54622 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

I have no idea


Yup, clearly a Tillman alter.

Too lazy or too slow to pull up the facts.
Posted by 19812016
Member since Jul 2017
1172 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 6:00 pm to
What facts did I miss? Please tell me you are trying to prove that Scar has a better athletic program than Clemson..

Are you a Scar fan?
Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

I'm actually going to pull for Auburn next week!


damn frickin' A. it's SEC baby!
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
95882 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 6:01 pm to
But we are a better athletic program

Clemson is a better football program, but it's not even close when you compare overall athletics.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54622 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

What facts did I miss?


I asked you to list the head to head games between Cocks and Taters for say the past 5 years and you failed to do so. Probably knowing already that the facts would not support your claim. I don't know enough to know for sure but I do know you avoiding it indicates you know the truth is something you will not like if you really are a Tater fan.

quote:

Are you a Scar fan?


I will defend all SEC teams from outsiders who feel they have a better history than they actually have. Hell the Gophers have a better football history than the Taters and they haven't been relevant since at least the Kennedy administration.
Posted by 19812016
Member since Jul 2017
1172 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 6:05 pm to
It's a lot closer than what football is, but idk about that. I'll give it to you, y'all usually have a good baseball team but we have been catching up. It's hard to say in basketball, the same way you think Clemson's run in football was a one year thing is the way we look at that basketball run that came out of nowhere. I know we have a good soccer program for men and good men's golf team, but I don't keep up with Scar much on those teams. I will admit that sometimes I have to pull for Scar players because I know the kids or their brother or sister. I do know that this past year we swept the major 3 men's sports, but y'all won the Palmetto Cup thing for all sports.
Posted by 19812016
Member since Jul 2017
1172 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 6:07 pm to
Why would I look up something that you could look up, you're the one that wants to know it. Look it up and enlighten me. I know we are on a 3 year winning streak in football and before that Scar had a 5 game winning streak, so by you looking that up you would say that the overall record is close in the last 5 years. But would anybody with half a fricking brain say that the football programs are close at all right now?
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
95882 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 6:09 pm to
You beat us without Thornwell. Impressive win, but it will always have an asterisk.

Baseball, we are down. That's why we got rid of our coach. His record against Clemson was inexcusable after Tanner dominated.

Football is king though. No denying that.
Posted by 19812016
Member since Jul 2017
1172 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 6:10 pm to
Clemson won a national championship in 2016 and 1981, what year was the Gophers doing their winning?

Clemson has a pretty impressive streak going with 10 win seasons in football. Beat Oklahoma twice, Ohio State twice, LSU, Bama, some very historical and respected programs. I don't care if you don't think Clemson's history isn't up to par, history doesn't have shite to do with the teams that are walking on the field this year
Posted by 19812016
Member since Jul 2017
1172 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 6:16 pm to
He was suspended, he didn't just sit out because he wanted to or he was injured lol can't help that. He's a really good player btw, no doubt it would have changed the game but we'll take it

Tanner was a great baseball coach, dk about AD though. Glad he isn't the baseball coach anymore though, he always had a stacked team. I still remember Justin Smoak hitting one over our batting cages in right field...

And you are absolutely right. I think most of our fans would be 100% ok with canning the rest of the athletic teams and giving football all the money
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

Clemson is a better football program, but it's not even close when you compare overall athletics.

Y'all both have the same amount of NCAA titles.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37605 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 6:37 pm to
Let's talk some rivalry history, if your dumb fricking sheep humping arse is capable?

Pre-1945 Clemson dominated. Clemson was an all-male A&M academy ... most all male schools, even the service schools, dominated the coed schools back then. Need I explain why? I hope not.

Modern history ... 1945-1975 the series was almost dead even. Clemson's beloved Coach Howard had a losing record against SC during that span of time. 1975 SC mudholed Clemson and Clemson vowed to win at all costs. They took cheating to a whole new level - bought players, turned things around under Charlie Pell and Danny Ford ... won their first national championship followed by major sanctions twice over the course of 81-87. Most believe Clemson should have received the death penalty before SMU.

But from '75-'91 they once against dominated the series against a football Independent SC ... as well as the ACC. They paid for, and fielded, some excellent teams during that era.

ACC vs SEC ... 1992 and SC is in the SEC. Those were also the dominant UF and Tennessee years and for the first twenty years in this conference we finished the season against Tennessee on Halloween weekend, Florida the second weekend of November and Clemson the third weekend of November until eight years ago when the Clemson game was finally moved to Thanksgiving weekend.

For more than 20 years we limped into the Clemson game, short handed and battered and bruised from the Tennessee and Florida games ... while Clemson was cruising through their pussy ACC slates.

Even so, since SEC-ACC expansion in '92, Clemson leads the series 15-10. This includes the early years in the SEC when SC was being pounded by UF and UT through much of the 90s ... and that did affect their games vs Clemson.

The past ten years the series is dead even at 5-5.

The overall history of the series, 120 games, the average margin of victory is less than a touchdown.

Take the pre-WWII games out of the series, where Clemson was an all male basically Military academy, and the series is actually very close.

The rivalry is ugly because it was born out of politics, not football, and it remains that way today.

Clemson fans are a predominantly racist fricktard inbred bunch of sheephumping rednecks ... while Carolina fans are a more refined, genteel, Southern gentlemen and ladies type of crowd.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 6:39 pm to
Y'all have the same amount of major infractions in football. You do know that, right?
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37605 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 7:00 pm to
No, we don't.

Clemson had 132 major infractions involving cash or illegal transactions listed by the NCAA in their '82 findings alone. It was two solid sheets of findings. I've still got a copy of the NCAA findings somewhere.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 7:03 pm to
Yes, you do (3 each).

LINK

Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30865 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

You're just gonna hold on to that aren't you? Keep it in your pocket just in case they turn to shite. Don't be so insecure.


...

I just feel bad for their QB. Jeez.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37605 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 7:07 pm to
Those are overall findings in which infractions were found in a given year and sanctions handed down.

That does not break down the actual number of individual infractions case by case.

SC had major infractions and sanctions applied for the '88 steroid scandal, but we were the sacrificial lambs as an Independent ... because everyone was doing it - Sports Illustrated and bastard Tommy Chaikin made ours the most public.

It killed Joe Morrison.
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 7:13 pm to
quote:

the ACC was the best in the country in OOC and bowl games last year
oh so you like one year sample sizes as opposed to, say, the last 15 years or so. whatever.

btw, the acc edged the sec on overall ooc record so, it's not like the acc was head and shoulders better over the course of the season.

moreover, you're conspicuously silent on this first weekend's results.
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 9/5/17 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

We have better football players at every position
i don't think you realize that there are about 4 teams in the entire country that could consistently compete with the top half of the sec; ok, clemson, osu and fsu. that's about it. and clemson is a RECENT addition to that list. ok may be about to take a step back so that list will diminish yet again. so, your crap posts are seriously lacking context.
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter