Started By
Message
SEC Basketball All-Time Rankings
Posted on 1/28/21 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 1/28/21 at 1:06 pm
Better system, I think. Probably some stuff that is too high/low
The points you get for the season are how far in the tournament you reached, not all combined
- National Title (40 pts)
- Final Four (15 pts)
- Elite Eight (10 pts)
- Sweet 16 (6 pts)
- 1st/2nd round (2 pts)
- Conference Regular Season Title (8 pts)
- Conference Tournament Title (3 pts)
- Conference Wins (0.15 pts)
- Conference Losses (-0.15 pts)
Overall
1. Kentucky (1,368)
2. Arkansas (481)
3. Florida (282)
4. Missouri (258)
5. LSU (230)
6. Tennessee (222)
7. Alabama (194)
8. Texas A&M (144)
9. Mississippi St (121)
10. Vanderbilt (92)
11. South Carolina (81)
12. Auburn (64)
13. Georgia (26)
14. Ole Miss (5)
NCAA Tournament Points Only
1. Kentucky (731)
2. Arkansas (211)
3. Florida (199)
4. LSU (128)
5. Missouri (102)
6. Tennessee (80)
7. Alabama (78)
8. Vanderbilt (58)
9. Auburn (53)
10. Texas A&M (52)
11. Mississippi St (43)
11. South Carolina (43)
13. Georgia (41)
14. Ole Miss (22)
The points you get for the season are how far in the tournament you reached, not all combined
- National Title (40 pts)
- Final Four (15 pts)
- Elite Eight (10 pts)
- Sweet 16 (6 pts)
- 1st/2nd round (2 pts)
- Conference Regular Season Title (8 pts)
- Conference Tournament Title (3 pts)
- Conference Wins (0.15 pts)
- Conference Losses (-0.15 pts)
Overall
1. Kentucky (1,368)
2. Arkansas (481)
3. Florida (282)
4. Missouri (258)
5. LSU (230)
6. Tennessee (222)
7. Alabama (194)
8. Texas A&M (144)
9. Mississippi St (121)
10. Vanderbilt (92)
11. South Carolina (81)
12. Auburn (64)
13. Georgia (26)
14. Ole Miss (5)
NCAA Tournament Points Only
1. Kentucky (731)
2. Arkansas (211)
3. Florida (199)
4. LSU (128)
5. Missouri (102)
6. Tennessee (80)
7. Alabama (78)
8. Vanderbilt (58)
9. Auburn (53)
10. Texas A&M (52)
11. Mississippi St (43)
11. South Carolina (43)
13. Georgia (41)
14. Ole Miss (22)
This post was edited on 1/28/21 at 1:55 pm
21
Posted on 1/28/21 at 1:12 pm to SummerOfGeorge
If you wanted to go a little deeper on this, you could even include drafted players. Would be interesting to see how that changes some of these rankings.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 1:13 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
3. Florida (316)
4. Missouri (294)
Did Florida used to have a bad program? figured they would have been much higher than us since we've never even had a final four.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 1:14 pm to mizslu314
Florida's first NCAA tournament was 1987. Their first SEC Title was 1989. Their first SEC Tournament Title was 2005.
So basically their entire history is in the last 30 seasons. And it's been an incredible last 30 seasons.
So basically their entire history is in the last 30 seasons. And it's been an incredible last 30 seasons.
This post was edited on 1/28/21 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 1/28/21 at 1:17 pm to SummerOfGeorge
My only suggestion is (and God knows I'm not doing the work to figure it out), maybe more points for conference wins and perhaps for top 3 finish in regular season standings.
But infinitely better than those rankings in the earlier thread
But infinitely better than those rankings in the earlier thread
This post was edited on 1/28/21 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 1/28/21 at 1:17 pm to mizslu314
quote:Donovan pretty much built the Florida you know now. It was a whole lot of nothing before then.
Did Florida used to have a bad program?
Posted on 1/28/21 at 1:19 pm to BobLeeDagger
quote:
If you wanted to go a little deeper on this, you could even include drafted players. Would be interesting to see how that changes some of these rankings.
That'd feel a little disingenuous though if you're talking about ranking SEC programs. A player getting drafted doesn't necessarily equate the quality of their team.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 1:19 pm to BluegrassBelle
Kind of my thoughts too. I don't really like when individual awards are included in theses types of lists.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 1:25 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
That'd feel a little disingenuous though if you're talking about ranking SEC programs. A player getting drafted doesn't necessarily equate the quality of their team.
No fair talking about Ben Simmons!!!
Posted on 1/28/21 at 1:27 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Just for clarification, runner-up would be awarded the final four 15 points correct? Or is that 40 for reaching the National Title Game itself?
Posted on 1/28/21 at 1:28 pm to Drewbie
Yea I didn't qualify between FF and Title Game loser
Posted on 1/28/21 at 1:30 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Wins should count more, IMO. That's a true indicator of staying power and consistency.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 1:31 pm to mizslu314
quote:
Did Florida used to have a bad program? figured they would have been much higher than us since we've never even had a final four.
We pretty much sucked at everything but baseball and swimming prior to 1980.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 1:33 pm to LSUgrad88
quote:
No fair talking about Ben Simmons!!!
We've had our fair share of Kentucky guys drafted who really had no business being drafted too.
I just think you have the Chris Silva types that helped USC get to a Final Four and had lots of SEC accolades but didn't get drafted. The points should go to their in-college achievements if we're comparing college teams. Especially when you have the NBA drafting on potential as well.
This post was edited on 1/28/21 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 1/28/21 at 1:37 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Good work George. Love these informative threads. Shows clarity imo
Posted on 1/28/21 at 1:39 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Think a little more weight should go to wins/losses, it takes 30 wins to equal winning a conference tournament? I'd at least double that multiplier to .2 from .1.
Would also switch 1st/2nd round win and winning conference tourney with each other. More weight to winning NCAAT game vs. conference tourney.
Would also switch 1st/2nd round win and winning conference tourney with each other. More weight to winning NCAAT game vs. conference tourney.
This post was edited on 1/28/21 at 1:41 pm
Posted on 1/28/21 at 1:50 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Wins should count more, IMO. That's a true indicator of staying power and consistency.
Who cares about this in college basketball? people only care about the post season like George said. It's completely different than college football. It always has been, but it is even more so now days.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 1:51 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Crazy UGA is so bad.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 1:55 pm to AUbagman
Changed from Total Wins/Losses to Conference Wins/Losses and moved from 0.10 pts to 0.15 pts.
No change in order.
No change in order.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 1:56 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Tennessee and Alabama are almost completely identical
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News