Started By
Message
re: SEC Baseball Programs Ranked Since Field Expansion to 64 Teams
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:18 pm to MullenBoys
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:18 pm to MullenBoys
quote:
I can cross numbers the same way and say LSU is middle of the pac based on my years I choose.
Do it.
1
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:19 pm to MullenBoys
quote:
That's fine but it comes across as Arkansas has a more storied tradition than MSU.
I mean if that's the way you want to take it. I took it more as a current state of the program since super regional play began
quote:
I can cross numbers the same way and say LSU is middle of the pac based on my years I choose.
You'd be hard pressed to find any block of years post mid-80s where LSU was middle of the pack
. You could find one where they're not #1, though. Since the feshman class of 1983, no player that stayed 4 years has ever missed a trip to Omaha, so good luck with that. Very few classes have gone fewer than twiceThis post was edited on 6/7/16 at 3:22 pm
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:21 pm to lsufball19
quote:
You'd be hard pressed to find any block of years post mid-80s where LSU was middle of the pack . You could find one where they're not #1, though
Since 2001 South Carolina has been the top baseball team in the SEC. Titles back that up. Ok?
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:21 pm to MNW
Instead of bitching, you could do your own.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:22 pm to MullenBoys
quote:
Since 2001 South Carolina has been the top baseball team in the SEC. Titles back that up. Ok?
ok? but that does not make LSU middle of the pack. I said you could find a block where LSU isn't #1
This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 3:23 pm
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:23 pm to Hugh McElroy
quote:
Since 2001 South Carolina has been the top baseball team in the SEC. Titles back that up. Ok?
Again, since we are tweaking years, South Carolina has been tops in the SEC since 2001. We good with that?
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:24 pm to MullenBoys
quote:
That's fine but it comes across as Arkansas has a more storied tradition than MSU.
No it doesn't
It comes across that Arkansas has been better since 1999, everyone understands this but you.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:26 pm to rockiee
quote:
No it doesn't It comes across that Arkansas has been better since 1999, everyone understands this but you.
What super regional are you in again?
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:27 pm to MullenBoys
quote:
What super regional are you in again?
yes, State is better this year than Arkansas. I don't think anyone disputes that
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:28 pm to MullenBoys
quote:
What super regional are you in again?
Not in one
How many times have you been in the CWS since 1999? I never knew someone would get this upset about simple facts.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:29 pm to MullenBoys
holy frick dude he presented a set of facts that are non biased and straight forward from 1999-present because of super regionals and you get asshurt over it being "selective?" 
this is the epitome of butthurt
mullenboys is in the dictionary right next to it
congrats
this is the epitome of butthurt
mullenboys is in the dictionary right next to it
congrats
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:29 pm to MullenBoys
quote:
What super regional are you in again?
The same one State was in last year.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:30 pm to rockiee
quote:
No it doesn't
It comes across that Arkansas has been better since 1999, everyone understands this but you.
You would think it was something difficult to understand.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:31 pm to lsufball19
quote:
because yall were in a weak conference and you couldn't beat big bro eh Texas and Oklahoma State were Omaha regulars. Oklahoma won a national title in 1994 and went to Omaha 3 of 4 years in that time span. In a tournament format that had 48 teams until 1999, that's not bad for a conference that had 10 members
OK State and OU were in a different conference than Texas and A&M
This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:32 pm to Farmer1906
Since muffin has his feelings hurt, maybe we could figure out a scoring system to go back further? Like add a little more for making a regional and regional final to acct for the 48 vs 64 team difference and the fact that there were no supers? Your points for the CWS would still be the same obviously.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:33 pm to Tiger Live2
quote:
You would think it was something difficult to understand.
Facts hurt and are hard to accept, I guess
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:33 pm to Farmer1906
Miss St should be above aggie since they made a CWS Final. Aggie never did that
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:34 pm to RoscoeHarper
quote:
Since muffin has his feelings hurt
Well, given his level of hurt, should we not simply declare State as the best baseball program ever in all of college athletics? Or would that still not suffice?
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:35 pm to Nado Jenkins83
A&M should be above MSU. We've hosted more and made more Supers.
See how easy that is? That is why I assigned a weight to each by relative importance.
I can tweak it if you can give me a valid reason.
See how easy that is? That is why I assigned a weight to each by relative importance.
I can tweak it if you can give me a valid reason.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 3:36 pm to RoscoeHarper
quote:
Since muffin has his feelings hurt, maybe we could figure out a scoring system to go back further? Like add a little more for making a regional and regional final to acct for the 48 vs 64 team difference and the fact that there were no supers? Your points for the CWS would still be the same obviously.
Let's just add 70 points for having a SEC Storied made about you. Till the 30th, they would be #1.
Page 4 of 9
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News