Started By
Message

SEC Baseball Programs Ranked Since Field Expansion to 64 Teams

Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:33 pm
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
50247 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:33 pm
I did this last year and if I remember correctly go some decent feedback on the system. Feel free to recommend any tweaks or point out if I got any team's info wrong.

This mostly focuses on mostly postseason play because in the end, that is what matters. It doesn't factor in regular season titles. I went back to 1999, when the new regional/super regional system was put in to place. It is always hard to find when to start counting from, but this is IMO a big enough window to capture some history yet keep it somewhat relevant to how good programs are today. Anyway this is how it works:

Make a Regional = 0.5 Points (+0.5 bonus if you host)
Make a Regional Final = 1.0 Point
Make a Super Regional = 2.0 Points (+1.0 bonus if you host)
Make the College World Series = 4.0 Points
Make the College World Series Final = 4.0 Points
Win the College World Series = 8.0 Points.
The maximum points you can earn in a single season is 21 points.

1. South Carolina 114.0
2. LSU 112.5
3. Florida 74.0
4. Vanderbilt 60.0
5. Arkansas 48.0
6. Texas A&M 44.0
6. Mississippi St 44.0
8. Georgia 42.5
9. Ole Miss 35.0
10. Alabama 25.0
11. Tennessee 15.5
12. Auburn 10.5
13. Kentucky 5.5
14. Missouri 5.0

This does include 2016 and will update after games finish.


This post was edited on 6/8/16 at 10:37 am
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59603 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:34 pm to
MSU should be above aggie.

alphabetical is the tie breaker.
Posted by BIWO
Member since Dec 2015
1821 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:35 pm to
Interesting: LSU still #1 when you take away the 4 titles in the 90s
Posted by biggsc
32.4767389, 35.5697717
Member since Mar 2009
34209 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:35 pm to
Alabama needs some work to do
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
50247 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:36 pm to
Not according to my spreadsheet.
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46427 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:36 pm to
Amusing how large some of the gaps are. Very much so one of those spatial lists:

LSU 109.5
South Carolina 108.0


Florida 74.0

Vanderbilt 60.0

Arkansas 47.0
Texas A&M 44.0
Mississippi St 44.0
Georgia 42.5

Ole Miss 35.0

Alabama 25.0

Tennessee 15.5
Auburn 10.5
Kentucky 5.5
Missouri 5.0
Posted by BartnBrigLSU
Member since Jun 2013
512 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:36 pm to
Couldn't have started at 1990?
Posted by hg
Member since Jun 2009
123595 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

I went back to 1999, when the new regional/super regional system was put in to place.


Why?
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
50247 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Interesting: LSU still #1 when you take away the 4 titles in the 90s



LSU leads the conference in:
CWS Titles (tied)
CWS appearances
Super Regional Hosts
Super Regionals
Regional Hosts
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
50247 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:38 pm to
Read the OP
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

Why?

Because:
quote:

It is always hard to find when to start counting from, but this is IMO a big enough window to capture some history yet keep it somewhat relevant to how good programs are today.
Posted by BobLeeDagger
In Your Head
Member since May 2016
6907 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:40 pm to
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46427 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

Couldn't have started at 1990?


I'll gladly take our national title added to our score
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86441 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

postseason play because in the end, that is what matters


quote:

I went back to 1999


soooo...what about the SEC programs who won a CWS title prior to 1999?
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
50247 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:50 pm to
Missouri and a few more I think.
This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 1:51 pm
Posted by MSU5
Memphis
Member since Aug 2011
3411 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:50 pm to
If you go look at Texas A&M's succes prior to 1999 you'll know exactly why OP stopped there. LOL The gap between MSU and Aggie keeps growing
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64500 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Why?

that's when super regional play began. i actually don't see the problem with the time frame. the tournament expanded to 64 teams and added super regionals in 1999, so it makes sense given the parameters used
This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 1:53 pm
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
50247 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:53 pm to
A&M made the postseason 11/13 years before 1999 when it was much more difficult to make the postseason.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43793 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

Make a Super Regional = 2.0 Points
Host a Super Regional = 1.0 Point (+1.0 bonus if you host)


This is worded weird. Shouldn't it be:

Make a Super Regional = 2.0 Points (+1.0 bonus if you host)


The way you have it means you get two for making it, one for hosting, plus another bonus for hosting.
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
50247 posts
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:54 pm to
You're right. Fixed it.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter