Started By
Message
SC STILL getting punked by SEC refs.
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:23 am
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:23 am
Even tho nobody saw and and fewer people cared, there was lots of shady stuff going on with the refs Saturday Vandy vs SC. The penalty differential was SC 11-94 and 2-20 Vandy. One of Vandy's penalties was an intentional 5 yard delay of game.
In addition to the penalties, they were the victim of terbile spots. Case in point
LINK
And PLEASE tell me how this isn't a TD? Ball goes right over the pylon. Oh, and lets not even mention the helmet to helmet hit on the play that should have been targeting.
LINK
It's clear at this point that the front office is punishing Muschamp and SC for the "Gutless" comment.
Edited to add: Here's the gif of the TD play.
In addition to the penalties, they were the victim of terbile spots. Case in point
LINK
And PLEASE tell me how this isn't a TD? Ball goes right over the pylon. Oh, and lets not even mention the helmet to helmet hit on the play that should have been targeting.
LINK
It's clear at this point that the front office is punishing Muschamp and SC for the "Gutless" comment.
Edited to add: Here's the gif of the TD play.
This post was edited on 11/4/19 at 9:20 am
16
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:24 am to Lonnie Utah
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:28 am to Lonnie Utah
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:30 am to viceman
Your team is not the the only team. There is always some kind of holding, facemask. Replay has put a big spotlight on the refs and it’s not looking to good. If the system was perfect every play would have a flag. The Refs need to up their game.
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:31 am to Lonnie Utah
You piss off the refs and they will find ways to frick with you...They tormented CMR after the celebration for years.
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:32 am to Lonnie Utah
quote:
nobody saw and and fewer people cared
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:32 am to armtackledawg
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:37 am to viceman
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:37 am to Lonnie Utah
Fraudulent officiating
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:39 am to Lonnie Utah
Didn't see the game, but on the first one that spot was pretty close certainly within a a couple of inches and it looked the like the actual first down marker (not the yellow line) was inside the 21 and I don't think it was clear at all that the runner got inside the 21 so it doesn't look like SC clearly got screwed there.
On the second one, it certainly looked like the ball passed over the pile on while the ball carrier was in bounds. Obviously it was very close and I don't think that was an egregious miss by the official on the field. I thought it should be overturned on the review, but you could argue that none of the views showed an angle that would 100% definitely show the ball went over the pile on.
Both of these are calls of inches though. The first one in particular looks like it was probably right - not a first down. The second looks probably wrong - it was a TD, but these aren't calls that show some sort of "shady" stuff going on at all.
On the second one, it certainly looked like the ball passed over the pile on while the ball carrier was in bounds. Obviously it was very close and I don't think that was an egregious miss by the official on the field. I thought it should be overturned on the review, but you could argue that none of the views showed an angle that would 100% definitely show the ball went over the pile on.
Both of these are calls of inches though. The first one in particular looks like it was probably right - not a first down. The second looks probably wrong - it was a TD, but these aren't calls that show some sort of "shady" stuff going on at all.
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:39 am to Statestreet
quote:
Fraudulent officiating
There was talk in the game thread that SC fans are looking forward to ACC officials vs Clemson (as ridiculous as that sounds).
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:40 am to elposter
quote:
Both of these are calls of inches though. The first one in particular looks like it was probably right - not a first down. The second looks probably wrong - it was a TD, but these aren't calls that show some sort of "shady" stuff going on at all.
I get the point, but please keep in mind that those are the only ones I could find replay's of. There was lots more that wasn't "highlight" worthy.
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:43 am to Lonnie Utah
I think the SEC officials don’t like Muschamp getting in their face screaming at them like a madman and otherwise criticizing them publicly.
So, yeah, I would not be surprised if SEC refs have it in for S. Carolina.
So, yeah, I would not be surprised if SEC refs have it in for S. Carolina.
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:45 am to Lonnie Utah
I watched the td clip and was expecting it to not be a td
But it’s clearly a td
But it’s clearly a td
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:49 am to Lonnie Utah
Scar gets punked by everybody, not just the refs
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:49 am to Lonnie Utah
quote:
SC STILL getting punked by SEC refs
What's the REC angle with this?
No matter but speaking of the REC, we all now know why there were no targeting ejections against lsu when they played state.
The REC took a different approach and gave michael divinity a free sack of pot. Word on the street is he's suspended for the bammie game.
The REC don't frick around.
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:49 am to Lonnie Utah
Lonnie I like you and think you are good guy but coming on here every week pointing out bad calls is getting old especially after a win
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:50 am to Lonnie Utah
Muschamp needs to call them out in every postgame PC so the spotlight gets brighter and brighter.
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:55 am to Icoachfb
quote:
Lonnie I like you and think you are good guy but coming on here every week pointing out bad calls is getting old especially after a win
1). Did you watch our game?
2). If Yes on #1, did you think it was officiated fairly?
Posted on 11/4/19 at 8:56 am to cyclingout
quote:
Scar gets punked by everybody, not just the refs
Congrats on the Big win over Wofford.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News