Started By
Message
re: Refs shouldn't determine the NC
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:47 pm to teamjackson
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:47 pm to teamjackson
quote:
frick Auburn.
Melt Bitch
0
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:47 pm to Irons Puppet
It's pretty damning that there isn't a single thread on the MSB arguing over the final foul.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:48 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
99% of the Refs in the game would not have made that call when it didn't effect the shot.
Which game are you talking about? I thought you were talking about tonight’s game till I read your last sentence. Clearly that much contact would effect the shot.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:48 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
What?
There was major contact well before the ball left the shooter's hands.
I think it was before as well. I was just throwing AU fans a bone and pointing out that even if the contact was after the shot, it's still a foul, and for good reason. I'm just laughing at the "it was after the shot" logic as if it would even matter.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:49 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
It's pretty damning that there isn't a single thread on the MSB arguing over the final foul.
are there any about the double dribble?
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:50 pm to dehsloot
quote:
A still shot only shows an AU player standing there with his hands up. He’s allowed to do that.
So now combine the still shot with a video and you will know the AU player was clearly moving forward into the players and not just standing there.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:51 pm to MrAUTigers
Ok you got me 
There isn't one on the double dribble either.
There isn't one on the double dribble either.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:54 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
It's pretty damning that there isn't a single thread on the MSB arguing over the final foul.
are there any about the double dribble?
He is referring to Brown being fouled on the last shot I believe. It can be argued the player took a step from A to B while Brown was in the air and made contact in his landing area. Not sure I would make it though.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:55 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
There isn't one on the double dribble either.
Which, if called correctly, would have made the rest of the game mute.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 8:59 pm to borotiger
quote:I agree
Which, if called correctly, would have made the rest of the game..
quote:Oh goddamnit.
mute.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 9:06 pm to ReauxlTide222
They wouldn't have had the ball.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 9:07 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:Damn fine post!...much respect.
we have so many bitching about the missed call. Again, our poor shooting cost us the game. We had every opportunity to put the game away and couldn't do it. UVa could. You just have to tip your cap to them and realize our guys had a great season but just came up a little short. I could not be more proud of our bunch.
This post was edited on 4/6/19 at 9:09 pm
Posted on 4/6/19 at 9:15 pm to coachcrisp
They did the same thing in the opening round against NMSU only this time it cost them the game like it should have in the opening round.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 9:17 pm to Irons Puppet
If there is a school that deserves a questionable call to go against them in a big game it's Auburn.
shite tonight was hilarious.
shite tonight was hilarious.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 9:18 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
Again, 99% of the Refs in the game would not have made that call when it didn't effect the shot.
you're saying that didn't affect his shot?
Posted on 4/6/19 at 9:19 pm to LSUSLU106
quote:
They did the same thing in the opening round against NMSU only this time it cost them the game like it should have in the opening round.
Nah, we turned the ball over 8 times in 90 seconds in the opening game.
Tonight we made plays and UVA did as well...the refs inserted themselves into the game and the rest is history. UVA did a great job defending us all night, but our guys played gutsy and stayed close and took the lead late. It sucked to lose and it was worse to lose in a manner that felt like it shouldn't have happened, but basketball refs have been over calling games for generations...it just sucked that in 2 seconds of game time they swallowed a whistle and called a call that is often over looked situationally and both went against Auburn.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 9:22 pm to UNO
There were two officials in position to make the double dribble call which would have rendered the rest of it moot, and they blew it. It should have been an easy call it happened in the open floor, they just swallowed their whistles.
They had been letting them play all game and it was a ticky tack call at the end , not that much contact. I saw people clearing out with their free arm all game and they wouldn't call it.
They had been letting them play all game and it was a ticky tack call at the end , not that much contact. I saw people clearing out with their free arm all game and they wouldn't call it.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 9:22 pm to Tigerman97
But they still made the stupid same bone headed foul at the end of the game on a 3 point attempt, which yes should have cost them the game if the guy makes all 3 free throws from NMSU. Do not care what lead to NMSU back in the game to make it close.
Posted on 4/6/19 at 9:24 pm to UNO
quote:
you're saying that didn't affect his shot?
No, he was touched after he released the ball. You will see that "No Call" 99% of the time. And if it determines who goes to the NCG, you do not call it. Again, if you watched the game, the refs were not making those calls for 39 mins of the game,
Posted on 4/6/19 at 9:24 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:And before.
No, he was touched after he released the ball.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News