Started By
Message
re: POLL>>>>
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:13 pm to spacewrangler
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:13 pm to spacewrangler
quote:
A- a good call--
"Ball Out of Bounds
ARTICLE 3. a. A ball not in player possession, other than a kick that scores a field goal, is out of bounds when it touches the ground, a player, a game official or anything else that is on or outside a boundary line."
Julio is out of bounds when he touches the ball simultaneously with Peterson. Even before Peterson could tuck the ball, the ball was dead.
Keep grasping at those straws....
1
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:14 pm to JPLSU1981
Just wondering.......... did you read the rule I posted? Because it has nothing to do with the gif you posted.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:15 pm to Teague
quote:
My point is, the call wasn't nearly as bad as everyone is trying to make out.
Anytime there is a clear interception, supported by video evidence, in a national championship semifinal game, in the fourth quarter, in a 6-point game ... I think it's safe to say it was one of the worst calls in the conference this season.
If you don't see that, you're blind.
That said, LSU still may not have scored. But LSU certainly got robbed of the opportunity at a crucial time in the game.
This post was edited on 11/8/09 at 10:18 pm
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:16 pm to Teague
quote:
Just wondering.......... did you read the rule I posted? Because it has nothing to do with the gif you posted.
Considering that you're claiming Julio touched it while out of bounds and therefore the ball is dead, I'd say video of the play in question that you are referring to is pretty important.
FWIW, it's stupid to make that claim and you make yourself look a little silly. You know it was the wrong call just like everyone else ... there's no defending it.
This post was edited on 11/8/09 at 10:18 pm
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:19 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
FWIW, it's stupid to make that claim and you make yourself look a little silly. You know it was the wrong call just like everything else ... there's no defending it.
After watching and rewatching the video, I think it would have probably been the wrong call IF Julio did not touch the ball while out of bounds. But he does. Now, does Peterson have control of it before Julio's foot comes down out of bounds? I don't know. But it's a very very close call, despite all the whining to the contrary on this board.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:21 pm to Teague
Spin it any way you want, but it was an interception and there was clear video evidence showing that it was an interception.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:22 pm to Teague
quote:
Teague
I never thought there would be a Gump dumb enough to try and dispute that the call was wrong, but I sold the Gumps short. There's always one dumb enough no matter what.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:27 pm to Teague
quote:
After watching and rewatching the video, I think it would have probably been the wrong call IF Julio did not touch the ball while out of bounds. But he does.
So where's your proof that Julio touched the ball? Cuz I sure as hell don't see anything..
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:29 pm to UPT
quote:
POLL>>>>
So, how many of you believe that the controversial interception call was:
a.) A good call.
b.) Should have been overturned by video evidence.
c.) was correct as there was not enough evidence to overturn the call.
d.) believe that the referees were helping fix the game for Alabama.
Just so we know where everyone stands.
Another interception thread. kms.
I say:
e.) it does not matter, the game has been over more than 24 hours (Didn't learn the Saban rule yet?)
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:32 pm to magiLSU
quote:
So where's your proof that Julio touched the ball? Cuz I sure as hell don't see anything..
You don't think he touched this ball???
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:35 pm to Teague
That picture is fuzzier than Terry Saban's balls.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:43 pm to TigersRuleTheEarth
B
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:44 pm to TigersRuleTheEarth
quote:
That picture is fuzzier than Terry Saban's balls.
I'll give you a hint:
Julio's hand is at the end of his arm.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:44 pm to Teague
quote:
You don't think he touched this ball???
regardless if he did, he's still in the air.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:47 pm to Golfer
quote:
regardless if he did, he's still in the air.
All this time? He never came down? Damn, I know Julio's got hops, but I didn't know he had it like that.
This post was edited on 11/8/09 at 10:48 pm
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:48 pm to Teague
quote:after he touched the ball he did
All this time? He never came down?
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:50 pm to magiLSU
quote:
So where's your proof that Julio touched the ball?
There is none.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:54 pm to Golfer
quote:
regardless if he did, he's still in the air.
Oh, look, he did come down.
Is he still touching the ball? I don't know, but it's likely.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 10:55 pm to mprtiger
quote:
So where's your proof that Julio touched the ball?
There is none.
There doesn't have to be. It was ruled incomplete on the field. YOU have to prove that it WAS an INT to get the call overturned.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 11:20 pm to Teague
As stated earlier, you have no conclusive evidence that Julio touched the ball or was not in the air if the touch occurred, so drop your argument.
This post was edited on 11/8/09 at 11:22 pm
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News