Started By
Message
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:51 pm to UPT
c.) was correct as there was not enough evidence to overturn the call.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:52 pm to Golfer
quote:
And Peterson had possession.
According to who? Julio touched the ball AS IT frickING ARRIVED. How the hell did Peterson already have possession?
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:56 pm to spacewrangler
quote:
Julio is out of bounds when he touches the ball simultaneously with Peterson. Even before Peterson could tuck the ball, the ball was dead.
This was not the call. IF it had been, there would have been a flag for illegal particiaption, this was NOT a factor in the determination, as the call would not have been reviewed.
The call was reviewed to determine possession, it clearly showed possession and establishing an inbounds by PP.....and was not overturned.
Sulk away quietly please.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:59 pm to Teague
i still think julio was in the air when he touched the ball
Posted on 11/8/09 at 7:59 pm to UPT
Hate to say it but I have to go with C
Congrats Bama on the victory
Congrats Bama on the victory
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:01 pm to Teague
quote:
According to who? Julio touched the ball AS IT frickING ARRIVED
WAS ILLEGAL PARTICIPATION CALLED?
IF NOT>>>>>
YOU HAVE NO ARGUMENT.
You Bama boys are like Glen Beck fans, you just embrace a talking point like no tomorrow.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:01 pm to Louie T
quote:
i still think julio was in the air when he touched the ball
He is...but of course they'll never admit that either.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:03 pm to Golfer
of course they want. bama fans are to big of homers to admit that shite.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:05 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
ou Bama boys are like Glen Beck fans, you just embrace a talking point like no tomorrow.
Of course. I cannot believe in all my life I would want LSU to leave the SEC. That started yesterday. the games in the SEC have been compromised.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:07 pm to Golfer
quote:
He is...but of course they'll never admit that either.
His left foot was out first.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:07 pm to Buckeye Fan 19
quote:no it wasn't - watch the replay
His left foot was out first.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:10 pm to Buckeye Fan 19
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:11 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
there would have been a flag for illegal particiaption
No, there wouldn't have been. Do they throw a flag if a punt returner is standing on the sideline when he catches the ball? No, they just call it dead.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 8:12 pm to sheek
livin off what other teams might do must suck huh?
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News