Started By
Message

re: Petrino prediction thread

Posted on 4/6/12 at 12:10 pm to
Posted by MissouriBengal
Cape Girardeau, Misosuri
Member since Sep 2011
99 posts
Posted on 4/6/12 at 12:10 pm to
I personally think he is gone, but to give you piggies some hope Rick Petino did the same thing basically and he kept his job.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112354 posts
Posted on 4/6/12 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

I personally think he is gone, but to give you piggies some hope Rick Petino did the same thing basically and he kept his job.


Not even comparable situations.
Posted by rangers911
Member since Jun 2009
5159 posts
Posted on 4/6/12 at 12:41 pm to
He is gone. This is going to cost Ark a lot of settlement money. They can't allow her to work under him but can't fire her and not fire him due to lawsuit threat. Also anyone else that wanted the job now has grounds to sue Ark.

I will be SHOCKED if he is kept.
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26986 posts
Posted on 4/6/12 at 1:07 pm to
Given that Saban owns Petrino's arse, I hope Petrino stays a long time.

Sadly, however, Petrino will be fired.

1. Screwing an employee.
2. Promoting girl he was screwing to a new position because he was screwing her...passing over other qualified applicants.
3. Creating hostile work environment for the girl's fianace. Can't fire him...he would sue.
4. The other unmentioned woman...the "previous relationship".
5. Firing him may prevent lawsuits by Dorrell and/or the fiance
6. Lying to the boss.
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26986 posts
Posted on 4/6/12 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Petrino prediction thread
quote:
was this relationship going on before she got the new job?...

Three days isn't much time to develop a "previous inappropriate relationship." I'm guessing it was going on for a while.


You wouldn't refer to someone you were riding a bike with a week ago as a "previous" relationship. This is a yet-unnamed additional woman, IMO.
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 4/6/12 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

You wouldn't refer to someone you were riding a bike with a week ago as a "previous" relationship. This is a yet-unnamed additional woman, IMO.


This
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26986 posts
Posted on 4/6/12 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

Petrino prediction thread
quote:
Anyone who applied for that job can now sue Arky.


Let's hope a minority did not apply for that postion



Exactly. Lot's of us here in the SEC want Petrino to stay at Arkansas a long, long time.
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 4/6/12 at 1:15 pm to
quote:


1. Screwing an employee.
2. Promoting girl he was screwing to a new position because he was screwing her...passing over other qualified applicants.
3. Creating hostile work environment for the girl's fianace. Can't fire him...he would sue.
4. The other unmentioned woman...the "previous relationship".
5. Firing him may prevent lawsuits by Dorrell and/or the fiance
6. Lying to the boss.


Arky fans don't want to read this
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112354 posts
Posted on 4/6/12 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

You wouldn't refer to someone you were riding a bike with a week ago as a "previous" relationship. This is a yet-unnamed additional woman, IMO.


Wait what? You would if it were a relationship that had been going on for a while before the bike thing. She is the "Inapropriate realtionship"

You just added A and B and went straight to X. Makes no sense unless im misunderstanding your post
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26986 posts
Posted on 4/6/12 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

Petrino prediction thread
quote:
do you comprehend the legal implications the university faces because of this?


No, please explain. This should be awesome to hear. The fact is none of you are lawyers. None of you are EO reps. None of you have any knowledge whatsoever in the legality of the hiring process at the UofA. Please stop talking and showing how ignorant you are. You know that blue is blue and water is wet. That's about the extent of your knowledge. I know you probably have a great online dating profile, but honestly you have no clue what the frick you are talking about.


You don't need a law degree. All you need are two brain cells to rub together (which you obviously don't have) in order to understand that if you pass over other qualified candidates for a job and hire someone because you're screwing them, you're gonna get your arse sued back to the stone age. Even in Arkansas.
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26986 posts
Posted on 4/6/12 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

Petrino prediction thread
quote:
You wouldn't refer to someone you were riding a bike with a week ago as a "previous" relationship. This is a yet-unnamed additional woman, IMO.


Wait what? You would if it were a relationship that had been going on for a while before the bike thing. She is the "Inapropriate realtionship"

You just added A and B and went straight to X. Makes no sense unless im misunderstanding your post



He didn't say "inappropriate relationship". He said "previous inappropriate relationship, i.e., previous to this incident. This implies a relationship that existed previous to this one. The relationship with Dorrell is currently in existence...not previous.

Or, to put it another way...

Are you married? If so, would you refer to your current wife as your previous wife...even if you've been married to her for a while?
This post was edited on 4/6/12 at 1:24 pm
Posted by LSUCanFAN
In the past
Member since Jan 2009
28071 posts
Posted on 4/6/12 at 1:26 pm to
Not fired douchers gon' douche
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112354 posts
Posted on 4/6/12 at 1:52 pm to
Explain to me why he would admit to another relationship because of this. Makes no sense for him to do that
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26986 posts
Posted on 4/6/12 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

Petrino prediction thread
Explain to me why he would admit to another relationship because of this. Makes no sense for him to do that



No one has accused Bobby Petrino of using any good sense whatsoever in this entire episode.
This post was edited on 4/6/12 at 2:07 pm
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 4/6/12 at 2:12 pm to
Pain pills are like truth serum
Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
14148 posts
Posted on 4/6/12 at 2:21 pm to
I don't know if he'll be fired, but I wish my employer would put me on paid administrative leave.
Posted by chilld28
Get in B Chord and Mash It!!
Member since Nov 2009
29622 posts
Posted on 4/6/12 at 2:23 pm to
They have all the local media digging like crazy now.

quote:

Kerri O'Hara ? @kerriohara Close
RT @JessicaDean: Some very interesting developments in the Petrino case regarding AR State Police involvement. Shocking really. More to come

Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28595 posts
Posted on 4/6/12 at 2:26 pm to
Dammit, just fire him now and move on. Don't want this shite to drag out...
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26986 posts
Posted on 4/6/12 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

Petrino prediction thread
Dammit, just fire him now and move on. Don't want this shite to drag out...


Oh, the real fun hasn't even begun yet. Remember the Hawg fan who got access to Houston Nutt's cell phone records? Stay tuned.
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 4/6/12 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

RT @JessicaDean: Some very interesting developments in the Petrino case regarding AR State Police involvement. Shocking really. More to come


Ahhhhh frick
Jump to page
Page First 12 13 14 15 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 14 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter