Started By
Message
re: Pac-10 racking up the losses against out-of-conference teams
Posted on 9/14/08 at 12:02 pm to SeattleTiger19
Posted on 9/14/08 at 12:02 pm to SeattleTiger19
quote:
Oh and the Mountain West owned the PAC 10 this week.
It was an arse whipping yesterday
1
Posted on 9/14/08 at 12:20 pm to usc6158
I hear the Pac-10 went 0-4 against the Mountain West yesterday.
Posted on 9/14/08 at 5:40 pm to Fighting Tigers
USC is good and even oregon, everyone else sucks.
UCLA lost to the BYU Cougars (0-59)?
15 Arizona State lost to the UNLV Rebels?
UCLA lost to the BYU Cougars (0-59)?
15 Arizona State lost to the UNLV Rebels?
Posted on 9/14/08 at 5:43 pm to lsusportsman2
But...
...but...
Dennis Erickson is a genius!
...but...
Dennis Erickson is a genius!
Posted on 9/14/08 at 5:47 pm to GoBigOrange86
the "genius" did lose to UNLV.
Posted on 9/14/08 at 6:19 pm to lsusportsman2
Up next week for the Pac-10
-Georgia (Ariz State will try and take them)
-Boise State (Oregon will try and take them)
-San Jose State (Standford will try and take them)
-Portland State (Washington St will try)
-Georgia (Ariz State will try and take them)
-Boise State (Oregon will try and take them)
-San Jose State (Standford will try and take them)
-Portland State (Washington St will try)
Posted on 9/15/08 at 11:13 am to Fighting Tigers
I just read this:
quote:
USC's Pac-10 brethren went 2-7 this past weekend. That includes Arizona, Arizona State, Stanford and UCLA going 0-4 against the Mountain West Conference, Washington State getting trampled by perennial Big 12 doormat Baylor and California falling to Maryland, which was coming off a loss to Middle Tennessee State.
Posted on 9/15/08 at 3:21 pm to That One
Pac Ten is crap but USC showed why they are the #1 team in the nation and Ore picked up a good win as well. I'm real disappointed in ASU. They were my sleeper.
Posted on 9/15/08 at 3:27 pm to Fighting Tigers
Pac Ten:
vs. all: 10-10
vs. top 25 at time played: 2-4
vs. current top 25: 1-4
vs. BCS: 5-5
vs. non-BCS FBS: 4-5
vs. non-FBS: 1-0
SEC:
vs. all: 23-3
vs. top 25 at time played: 1-1
vs. current top 25: 1-1
vs. BCS: 4-2
vs. non-BCS FBS: 13-1
vs. non-FBS: 6-0
Note: Notre Dame counted as BCS school.
vs. all: 10-10
vs. top 25 at time played: 2-4
vs. current top 25: 1-4
vs. BCS: 5-5
vs. non-BCS FBS: 4-5
vs. non-FBS: 1-0
SEC:
vs. all: 23-3
vs. top 25 at time played: 1-1
vs. current top 25: 1-1
vs. BCS: 4-2
vs. non-BCS FBS: 13-1
vs. non-FBS: 6-0
Note: Notre Dame counted as BCS school.
This post was edited on 9/15/08 at 3:30 pm
Posted on 9/15/08 at 3:35 pm to Fighting Tigers
I am not sure yet how strong the SEC really is given that no one has looked like a truly great team thus far, but I think it is safe to say that the Pac 10 will not challenge the SEC this year. Only one conference is in a position to do this year, and that's the Big 12.
Posted on 9/15/08 at 3:39 pm to tigerinridgeland
if the pac 10 wanted to expand to 12 teams i think they should ask byu to join.
Posted on 9/15/08 at 5:14 pm to itawambadog
BYU is the truth. Harvey Unga will just truck fools like it's cool. Fui Vakapuna ain't no joke either.
His name is a little funny though, especially if he'd been from Hong Kong.
His name is a little funny though, especially if he'd been from Hong Kong.
Posted on 9/15/08 at 5:24 pm to itawambadog
quote:
if the pac 10 wanted to expand to 12 teams i think they should ask byu to join.
BYU and Utah would make by far the most sense considering they are close, both pretty good at a number of sports, which is big in the pac-10, pretty solid academically, and would keep the interstate rivalries in the Pac-10 which each team has.
Pac-10 South- USC, UCLA, ASU, UofA, Utah, Byu
Pac-10 North- Oregon, OSU, Cal, Stanford, Wazzu, UW
If that Pac-10 is every going to expand that would make by far the most sense. Boise would be okay, but they can't compete in any other sport outside of football and don't have the academics to meet the other Pac-10 schools (outside of ASU)
Posted on 9/15/08 at 5:41 pm to Fighting Tigers
it was a bad week for out of conference games, and as I have researched the worst since the 1960's. However, hold on a bit for the season is young.
Posted on 9/15/08 at 5:43 pm to Fighting Tigers
yes Arizona ups for USC. Strange things happen in college football. LSU losing to Ky, and ARk
is example. W. Va-pitt etc
is example. W. Va-pitt etc
Posted on 9/15/08 at 10:05 pm to wolfgang
quote:
We have to play #9 Auburn, #2 Georgia, #4 Florida, #11 Alabama.
quote:
USC has to play #5 Ohio State, #16 Oregon, #15 Ariz State and #23 California.
To bring this up to the 9/15 AP Rankings.
LSU Plays (3)Georgia, (4)Florida, (9)Auburn and (10)Alabama
USC Plays(ed) (13) Ohio State (17) Oregon
Posted on 9/16/08 at 6:36 am to wolfgang
quote:
yes Arizona ups for USC. Strange things happen in college football. LSU losing to Ky, and ARk
is example. W. Va-pitt etc
You left out USC-Stanford.
Posted on 9/16/08 at 5:26 pm to SouGent
yes i did leave out usc-stanford. i suppose its not as bad as alabama=la. mon
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News