Started By
Message
re: One weakness that could sink each national title contender this year
Posted on 8/22/19 at 11:35 am to FluffyBunnyFeet
Posted on 8/22/19 at 11:35 am to FluffyBunnyFeet
They seem to have penis envy from not being included.
A&M seems to really crave attention
A&M seems to really crave attention
This post was edited on 8/22/19 at 11:36 am
0
Posted on 8/22/19 at 11:45 am to CivilTiger83
Clemson loses 46% of it's tackles from last year and 71% of it's sacks.
Posted on 8/22/19 at 11:48 am to FluffyBunnyFeet
(no message)
Posted on 8/22/19 at 11:49 am to FluffyBunnyFeet
Posted on 8/22/19 at 11:56 am to RatRodDawg
No Arkansas? List is.......
Accurate.
Accurate.
Posted on 8/22/19 at 11:57 am to Lonnie Utah
quote:
Clemson loses 46% of it's tackles from last year and 71% of it's sacks
OUCH!!! (Castration joke)
Posted on 8/22/19 at 12:08 pm to chillmonster
quote:
There are a dozen posters on this board alone who could do better than this.
All right, fellow Dawg...DO IT!
Posted on 8/22/19 at 12:08 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
Clemson loses 46% of it's tackles from last year and 71% of it's sacks.
I am not worried about replacing sacks - we are probably more athletic overall vs last year. The only thing that remains to be seen with our DEs will be how they hold up against the run on early downs.
At DT we are not replacing the same level of talent. Wilkins and Lawrence is the best DT combo Clemson has ever fielded. We have some young talent that will take time to develop and some top tier studs coming in next year.
Posted on 8/22/19 at 12:24 pm to RatRodDawg
quote:
Georgia fan
quote:
national title contender...Florida
Uh, oooooooh...
Start at about 8 posts down
Posted on 8/22/19 at 12:26 pm to Ross
quote:
Is there a reason 90% of this post is in italics and bolded?
To show that it is an article from a publication and not his own thoughts?
Posted on 8/22/19 at 12:31 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
That certainly matters but we're replacing four absolute NFL guys with four inexperienced guys.
I have more confidence in Oklahoma replacing Oline guys than Florida. Conversely, I have more confidence in Florida replacing defensive guys than Oklahoma.
That might not be an accurate way of looking at things or a fair way. It just seems like Oklahoma reloads on offense and Florida reloads on defense.
Posted on 8/22/19 at 12:36 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
I have more confidence in Oklahoma replacing Oline guys than Florida. Conversely, I have more confidence in Florida replacing defensive guys than Oklahoma.
That might not be an accurate way of looking at things or a fair way. It just seems like Oklahoma reloads on offense and Florida reloads on defense.
I agree with all of this, actually. Correct is correct. Remains to be seen what the new Defensive staff can do but that's the way it is until proven otherwise.
Posted on 8/22/19 at 12:37 pm to Ross
quote:I like it.
Is there a reason 90% of this post is in italics and bolded?
Posted on 8/22/19 at 12:44 pm to IrishHammer
quote:
IrishHammer
Do you live in Georgia by chance? Damn man you got like 100 posts and most have been shots at UGA.
Posted on 8/22/19 at 12:45 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
What a strange thing to beat your chest about. Over the last 5 seasons the amount of teams replacing all 5 of their top receivers has to be minuscule.
Exact thing I thought. Are we even sure that there’s been one instance of this?
Posted on 8/22/19 at 12:49 pm to RatRodDawg
quote:
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Never has a team made the Playoff when replacing the top 5 receivers from the previous season
I agree on the possible weakness but the comparison point is random. Its not like the playoffs have been around for decades. we are talking 5 years worth of data points but whatever
Posted on 8/22/19 at 12:51 pm to chillmonster
quote:
Have College FB writers always been this fricking lazy? I've been reading some of the most shallow, copypasta articles this offseason.
There are a dozen posters on this board alone who could do better than this.
Yes. Across the board. You're lucky if it's even spelled correctly these days but they are lazy and jump on board with just retread generic topics of the same player or teams. It's bad.
Posted on 8/22/19 at 1:03 pm to RatRodDawg
quote:
One weakness that could sink each national title contender this year
And all this time I thought it was jock-itch
This post was edited on 8/22/19 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 8/22/19 at 1:36 pm to BoerneAg
quote:
This is one of those cases where returning their defense is a bad thing. OU's defense is historically bad.
That defense is mostly blue chip players that were recruited by most SEC teams, so it will be interesting to see how they do in a real system not designed by Mike stoops. The best news is they can’t get any WORSE, and OU with even an average defense would win an NC.
This post was edited on 8/22/19 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 8/22/19 at 2:45 pm to RatRodDawg
Why the hell is Florida on here? They are not a national title contender
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News