Favorite team:Clemson 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:2525
Registered on:12/28/2017
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: My battle with covid

Posted by CivilTiger83 on 10/27/21 at 4:24 pm to
Bumping my previous question (a couple other posters asked it as well)... do you take any anabolic steroids or health supplements like creatine?

Edit: Nevermind. I see that you answered the question above. Rest up and take it easy! :cheers:

re: My battle with covid

Posted by CivilTiger83 on 10/27/21 at 1:22 pm to
You mentioned that you workout a lot. You don't happen to take steroids do you? I have heard that there may be a link between severity of COVID and steroid use in younger people... which is odd considering one of the treatments is a type of steroid.

Here is a case study on improved conditions from treating an anabolic steroid user... LINK
quote:

It hit me this morning that if I get worse and get moved to ICU and don't make it, I won't even be able to say goodbye to my family. Not sure if they can even hold a funeral either.


Ever read Victor Frankl’s Mans Search for Meaning? I would highly recommend it. Don’t discount the importance of mental discipline and hope during this time. Prayer and rest will do you good. Hang in there.
quote:

Nah, models have been grossly overstating death rates and hospitalizations since this started. Keep pushing your doom and gloom agenda though.


GOP_Tiger has been anything but doom and gloom on all these threads.
quote:

Even with all the testing South Korea did, their death rate is running over 1%.


They stopped the spread in a matter of weeks and didn't shut down the country. They tested at a higher rate than anyone during their crisis and did detailed case tracking (like Singapore).

They had the benefit of getting trained with the outbreaks of the past 20 years from nearby China - that is the one thing we didn't really have that they did.
:bow: Scruffy you have converted me over the past 2 weeks.

I think the miss on testing from the CDC will go down as one of the biggest blunders on a total dollars cost in US history. South Korea gave us the playbook that didn't include shutting down their economy, and we totally screwed it up.
quote:

Concomitant bacterial pneumonia is incredibly rare in these patients. The potential benefit of azithromycin lies in its inherent anti inflammatory properties. I doubt changing to doxy would benefit patients.

These patients don’t die from their viral pneumonia, they die from the massive inflammatory response and acute respiratory distress syndrome when their lungs fill with fluid. Stopping the massive cytokine storm/inflammatory cascade that causes this is key I think, and I would guess trials looking at tocilizumab (IL-6 inhibitor) or anakinra (IL-1 inhibitor) will be more promising. Just my 2 cents as an ER doc who follows this stuff super closely, for obvious reasons.


We do have another doc on here who said they prescribed Hydroxychloroquine only, and saw improvement only to see the patient go critical two days later due to a secondary bacterial pneumonia. It's one data point, but interesting nonetheless.
quote:

This is a tough one. I'm not sure who to believe. The doctor who does this for a living? Or some "OT keyboard scientist."


:lol: Touche.

I still hold to the fact that this French doctor from all accounts is a world renowned infectious disease doctor. The study may not be perfect, but does it really need to be?

Apologies to CWill - I have heard others make that criticism who have no more of a medical background than I do. I yield the floor.
quote:

I eagerly look forward to his published, double blind, randomized controlled trial showing this data.


quote:

The French study looked at viral clearance from the nares, an essentially worthless metric. We need mortality data/patient oriented outcomes, as well as proof of safety, to make better clinical decisions.


You are parroting the worthless crap from the Twitter keyboard scientists.

Do you really think a double blind study is required to show efficacy? If you are introducing a new long term drug trial it might be... not for an already established drug with a 50 year track record. The amount of positive data relative to a control group can be so overwhelming that there is no need to go through a double blind study.

This doctor is one of the best infectious disease doctors in the world... are you a doctor? Do you publish papers on treating infectious disease? I could care less whether or not his study was airtight... it was a way to measure objectively. Do you know how common it is for an active virus like this to disappear from the nasal cavity and not everywhere else?

Tell me, is NY which is currently doing a much larger trial right now with this treatment regimen doing a double blind study?

My non-medical guess based on all of the anecdotes coming out is that around 90-95% of patients who start treatment before they are in the critical stage will see a real improvement.
quote:

If there are proper studies done with proper controls then that would be great because lives would be saved. So far it seems like respected institutions like the CDC, WHO, and NIH believe this is not the case but they are willing to investigate this because that kind of information would be very helpful.


I am not going to wait to see what the CDC says... they are completely incompetent and have proven it consistently throughout this crisis.

What we had was a world renowned infectious disease doctor come up with a treatment that turned into an ad hoc study that was published to help the rest of the world.

Then all the Twitter scientist desk jockeys that don’t have a fraction of the genius of the original doctor started taking shots at the study like it was a 10-year drug trial not an ad hoc treatment. And the army of Actualies all came out because people were hopeful and Trump mentioned it. I don’t always like Trump’s approach but the media and Twitter know it alls have been the biggest bunch of idiots during this whole crisis.
quote:

it's easy to say this in hindsight but look at the MENSA posters we have here right now with evidence right in front of them.

imagine if they cancelled mardi gras in the middle of february, there may have been actual riots


re: Zoom security threat.

Posted by CivilTiger83 on 3/26/20 at 11:37 am to
:lol: Like a hacker is going to gain anything of importance from our Zoom meetings.

re: is ohio state slow

Posted by CivilTiger83 on 3/26/20 at 5:46 am to
quote:

They were a better team than Clemson and blew the game. Clemson was average on defense without 3 1st rders on defense.

OSU would have been a better match up against LSU as they had a better defense and run game than Clemson.


OSU had a great team, but Clemson had great players as well that made the critical plays. OSU’s head coach is a sore loser. Never seen someone whine so much after a playoff loss.
quote:

Would it have?

Do you know how many old people die a day in this country especially during flu season?

Have there been many more cases since then like that nursing home? It’s an outlier not the norm.



If 20% of nursing home residents suddenly fell ill and died a couple weeks later, I think you would see a lot of questions being asked. I doubt that most nursing homes ever see that kind of fatality rate from the flu.
Agreed DollaChoppa. I wouldn’t be surprised if the spread is 10 to 100 times current estimates with our limited testing.

I hope it’s true, but there are some data points that would suggest that isn’t the case. Nursing homes is the biggest one... if this has infected half the population you would have seen many more cases like the Washington nursing home in January/February. That would have raised alarms pretty quickly.
NY is probably the best statewide dataset at this point (lots of testing with a high number of cases with full reporting). They are showing around a 10% hospitalization rate with a case fatality rate at 0.7%.

There are two competing issues on the case fatality rate. On the one hand, fatalities will lag cases by at least a week. When you consider that cases are doubling every 5-7 days, that means that the true CFR might be double the current raw case fatality rate.

On the other hand with our limited testing there are likely many more cases than we thought. NY is testing more than anyone in the US, so they probably have a decent handle on the denominator... at least within the ballpark.

It appears that NY also has most of its cases in the lower risk category (under 70) so that helps the fatality numbers.
quote:

Something else interesting on this site is the number of how many are hospitalized.

We have about a 7% hospitalization rate which is lower than the 10-20% seen everywhere else. That’s one reason we haven’t gotten our asses kicked by this yet



That number might be misleading... if you look at individual states it appears that many states are not reporting that data (N/A for many states).
quote:

I don't disagree with testing. I feel it is the only thing that will satisfy people. But the exponential jump in the positive number WILL cause greater panic and more knee jerk reactions.

Testing must be moved to testing sites though. Places where staff are ONLY dressed in PPE and equipped for mass testing. These sites will conserve PPE.


Disagree that it will cause panic. Let's say tomorrow we know that there are actually 5 million cases of COVID-19 across the US. That would mean it is much closer to working itself through the population with greater herd immunity and it is much less fatal than we thought. ...Not saying that is the actual number, but just saying it is more likely to calm than panic most people.

re: ER Nurse observations.

Posted by CivilTiger83 on 3/24/20 at 8:27 am to
quote:

But you have to test everyone since more than half of the people with this thing are completely asymptomatic. Is that a viable approach for this country?



Testing symptomatic people and their families is a start. I am sure there are some ways by following the infections to relatively easily figure out a large chunk of who the asymptomatic cases are. Without testing we don't stand a chance. It's what South Korea and Singapore relied on to effectively stop the virus. It's very cheap relative to the alternatives. What is the harm?