re: Official: HBO Takes Down Every SEC School Ever Show

quote:

---

quote:
The problem with you logic is that the NCAA said Alabama had a TERRIBLE system in place, there were limited (no) controls in place...

---

So you want a link that Alabama had a bad system... I actually agree that this could cause Auburn problems, but Alabama did not have a good system in place about textbooks... So here is your link, . (BAMMERS, spread rumours, but always want a link)...
LINK LINK PHRASE WILL NOT BE REPEATED LINK
The university’s textbook disbursement system allows student-athletes on scholarship to charge their textbooks and other necessary academic supplies to the university’s on-campus supply store. After each month, the supply store forwards a detailed billing statement to the athletic department for review and payment.

According to the NCAA’s official report, the university failed to adequately monitor these reports, which showed that some students had charged academic items to their accounts on behalf of their girlfriends, friends and other acquaintances. This was the case for many of the 22 intentional wrongdoers, some of whom rang up charges in excess of $3,000...

Of course that is not enough... so lets see what the NZAA said...
2. FAILURE TO MONITOR. [NCAA Constitution 2.8.1 (Note: Bylaw citation is to the 2008-09 NCAA Division I Manual.)]
The scope and nature of the violations detailed in Finding B-1 demonstrate that the institution failed to monitor effectively the student-athlete textbook distribution system, and failed to assure compliance by not providing adequate NCAA rules education pertaining to athletics book aid to student-athletes and book store personnel.

Although the institution had created and implemented a system to control the textbook distribution process for NCAA compliance, the institution fell short in the following three areas: 1) the institution did not provide adequate rules education on the textbook issuance process for institutional employees or student-athletes; 2) the institution did not sufficiently monitor the textbook process before the textbooks left the store to prevent the violations; and 3) the institution did not sufficiently monitor the textbook process after the textbooks left the store to detect the violations in a timely fashion.
For the entire report....LINK PHRASE WILL NOT BE REPEATED