Started By
Message
locked post

NCAA really has some power

Posted on 9/15/10 at 8:37 am
Posted by ulikadawgs
Nashville
Member since Sep 2010
202 posts
Posted on 9/15/10 at 8:37 am

So the whole AJ thing was uncovered when the NCAA was looking at AJ's phone records and they saw the call between Hawkins and AJ. Then AJ came clean about everything. I don't know how all that went down, but going through a kids phone records seems a little overboard.
Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
42348 posts
Posted on 9/15/10 at 8:43 am to
quote:

but going through phone records seems a little overboard.


How?
Posted by rangers911
Member since Jun 2009
5159 posts
Posted on 9/15/10 at 8:43 am to
He can refuse to give them his phone records, at the same time they can pull his eligibility. The NCAA does not like being lied to.
Posted by ulikadawgs
Nashville
Member since Sep 2010
202 posts
Posted on 9/15/10 at 8:44 am to

it's a little big brother to me. the ncaa is a sanctioning body and they make up the rules as they go along
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46414 posts
Posted on 9/15/10 at 8:47 am to
Because they're not a government entity? Seems to me it'd be like your job just randomly checking your phone records to see what you've been up to. Seems like a violation of privacy to me

ETA: Unless he willingly complied to give his phone records, in which case the kid was nothing but upfront and they should get off his arse about it. Saw i another post, though, that they apparently made the connection between AJ and Hawkins via Hawkins' records
This post was edited on 9/15/10 at 8:52 am
Posted by AUriptide
Member since Aug 2009
7334 posts
Posted on 9/15/10 at 8:49 am to
I agree.

They treat each situation different and it's BS.
Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
42348 posts
Posted on 9/15/10 at 8:52 am to
quote:

checking your phone records to see what you've been up to.


I see nothing wrong with this...
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 9/15/10 at 8:52 am to
quote:


They treat each situation different and it's BS.


YES
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 9/15/10 at 8:52 am to
quote:

Because they're not a government entity?


They could not have subpoenaed them or simply served a warrant on the provider. IF they reviewed the records, it is because they were voluntarily handed over.


And, don't whine that they are so big that AJ would have felt compelled to comply with a request. Yep. That is correct. If you want to play NCAA football, that is part of the deal (the infraction committee being intimidating).

I am getting a little tired of all the "poor little rule breaker is powerless against the big bad enforcer" posts from the fanbases.

You make the bad decision, you risk the tough consequences. Simple as that.

I'll welcome AJ back whenever he is cleared to play. I am not anti-AJ. He just needs to pay the 'stupidity fine' and move on.
Posted by TigerFanNKaty
texas
Member since Sep 2008
10232 posts
Posted on 9/15/10 at 8:55 am to
I think it's wrong by I hate any big brother like activity. But weren't Georgia players already in question for same party the UNC players were at in Florida?
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 9/15/10 at 8:55 am to
quote:

Georgia players


no just Green and there, as far as I know, has been no proof he was even in Fla.
Posted by BruslyTiger
Waiting on 420...
Member since Oct 2003
4608 posts
Posted on 9/15/10 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Seems to me it'd be like your job just randomly checking your phone records to see what you've been up to. Seems like a violation of privacy to me

If your company pays for your phone, then it is their right to check it. If you own it, then not without a warrant.

But these kids are governed by the NCAA and that are the rules handed down. Play by the rules and don't do anything illegal, then there won't be any worries.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86438 posts
Posted on 9/15/10 at 8:58 am to
I was just thinking about this, and I know it's never going to happen but bare with me. What would happen if a school just didn't GAS what the NCAA said? Taking this situation as an example, let's say we just started playing AJ anyway. The NCAA would end up saying "AJ Green is ineligible, he can't play", and then we said WGAF and kept playing him anyway. Then at the end of the year we'd have to "vacate" the games. But I mean...what does someone saying that into a microphone and signing some piece of paper mean? The games were still played. So let's say they took scholarships away or something like that, and we said "F off" and still gave as many scholarships as we wanted. Then the NCAA gave us the death penalty and said we couldn't play football...but we just said "F you" and kept playing anyway? We still played the schedule and practiced and everything.


In this situation, what could the NCAA actually do to stop all that? If a team just said "we're doing what we want and you can't stop us", what could the NCAA REALLY do to stop them?
Posted by TigerFanNKaty
texas
Member since Sep 2008
10232 posts
Posted on 9/15/10 at 8:58 am to
Well then it's bullshite.
Posted by RlTde2
Pace Florida
Member since Nov 2008
4664 posts
Posted on 9/15/10 at 8:58 am to
It's all part of the "My little Fyfedom" Syndrome. Everybody tries to rule everyone else. We need the NCAA for certain but it is getting to be like "Big Brother" notice?
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46414 posts
Posted on 9/15/10 at 8:58 am to
edited my post before you posted this. pretty much agree with everything you said, but would like to see the suspension reduced a.) because im biased and b.) because the punishment doesn't fit the crime to me, regardless of the player involved
Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
42348 posts
Posted on 9/15/10 at 9:00 am to
quote:

If your company pays for your phone, then it is their right to check it.


No way, this makes you a batshit crazy enterprise...
Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
42348 posts
Posted on 9/15/10 at 9:00 am to
quote:

edited my post before you posted this. pretty much agree with everything you said, but would like to see the suspension reduced a.) because im biased and b.) because the punishment doesn't fit the crime to me, regardless of the player involved


He is getting off easy compared to Dez last year...
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 9/15/10 at 9:01 am to
quote:

He is getting off easy compared to Dez last year...


Dez directly lied to the NCAA A.J. did not.
Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
42348 posts
Posted on 9/15/10 at 9:02 am to
quote:

Dez directly lied to the NCAA A.J. did not.


AJ directly profited from his transgressions Dez did not.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter