Started By
Message
re: NCAA Baseball Tournament - Regionals - Friday
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:56 pm to beaverfever
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:56 pm to beaverfever
Wow! Oregon manager losing his shite. And dude has to sit next game
This post was edited on 5/30/25 at 10:57 pm
2
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:56 pm to NoMercy
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:56 pm to SEC Doctor
My my what a ruling.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:56 pm to SEC Doctor
I would too. Kind of has to in that situation
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:56 pm to hashtag
Just turned to the Oregon game. What the heck is going on.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:56 pm to Drewbie
Oregon player ejected and will now miss tomorrows game
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:56 pm to hashtag
quote:
Firing Les Miles was never gonna end the football teams success. Firing Bianco could do just that.
Best case scenario our baseball team plays up to its resources. Worst case we throw those into basketball. It's literally a win win
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:57 pm to lsufball19
I mean there was no way play was just standing after that shite break we just took
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:57 pm to BIGFOOD
That was great
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:57 pm to NoMercy
The runner did truck the catcher. But, the catcher was blocking home plate without the ball, which should have ended the play as obstruction with the rubber advancing a base.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:57 pm to TimeOutdoors
quote:Umps applied a written rule to the letter and home team is not happy about it.
Just turned to the Oregon game. What the heck is going on.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:57 pm to OleVaught14
It was the right call, Oregon guy trucked the catcher. He gone.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:57 pm to TimeOutdoors
quote:
Just turned to the Oregon game. What the heck is going on.
Play at the plate. Runner ran over catcher. Reviewed forever. Ruled malicious. Player ejected and called out. Pandemonium ensued
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:58 pm to lsufball19
Did they not call obstruction on the catcher? Thought it was obstruction if you block a bag or plate without firm control of the ball.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:58 pm to hashtag
Oregon’s catcher obstructed in the top of the 8th that wasn’t ruled obstruction. At least the reviews were consistent for both instances.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:59 pm to lsufball19
Oregon is either about to score 25 runs or completely implode after that.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:59 pm to hashtag
quote:
Did they not call obstruction on the catcher? Thought it was obstruction if you block a bag or plate without firm control of the ball.
That’s what they reviewed. They ruled it wasn’t obstruction
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:59 pm to lsufball19
And this is after we had a challenge for obstruction at the plate to end the top half. This game has gone off the rails. Sark after dark lives on
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:59 pm to SEC Doctor
Umps should not allow this dipshit Oregon fan to hold up a sign with lights on it during play.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:00 pm to Drewbie
Gotcha. Strange scenario. If both obstruction and trucking of the catcher occur, does one over rule the other?
Page 37 of 39
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News