Started By
Message
Miss State vs Fresno state Stanford / California Travel ban
Posted on 6/4/19 at 6:56 am
Posted on 6/4/19 at 6:56 am
I thought California had a travel ban on state groups traveling to Mississippi?
If Fresno state is a California state funded school, from California, and playing in Starkvegas how is this possible?
I guess the liberals will melt when they go to Mississippi to cheer on their team. Lol.
If Fresno state is a California state funded school, from California, and playing in Starkvegas how is this possible?
I guess the liberals will melt when they go to Mississippi to cheer on their team. Lol.
10
Posted on 6/4/19 at 6:58 am to johnnyrocket
Isn’t Stanford private?
Posted on 6/4/19 at 7:07 am to johnnyrocket
It's only been many hours since Stanford won the regional. Internet is your friend.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 7:10 am to johnnyrocket
Political board where people go to read this type of stuff.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 7:13 am to jptiger2009
quote:
Political board where people go to read this type of stuff.
Not really since this has a tie to an actual sporting event and not just dumb political banter. That being said, this should have been asked days ago. Not after private school Stanford wins.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 7:47 am to PorkDawg
I see it’s Stanford which yes it is private.
Fresno which is public lost to them.
Close a few games from putting a state travel ban to a test to see how it would hurt NCAA athletic competitions.
Fresno which is public lost to them.
Close a few games from putting a state travel ban to a test to see how it would hurt NCAA athletic competitions.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 8:11 am to johnnyrocket
it would be damned hilarious to advance on a forfeit because of that.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 8:12 am to johnnyrocket
To be honest, I would have loved to see Fresno advance to play us and see how it would have worked out. Would have been comical.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 8:37 am to johnnyrocket
They just can't use tax money to finance the trip. They would earmark a private donation from a booster to cover the trip. Case closed.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 8:40 am to johnnyrocket
So funny that a state will prohibit travel to another US state, yet openly will travel to countries like China.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 8:45 am to johnnyrocket
If it was really an issue, I'm sure some booster would pay for the travel.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 8:57 am to johnnyrocket
Mississippi is one of 8 states in their banned list.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 9:13 am to johnnyrocket
Stanford is a private school so this wouldn't come up.
But Fresno wasn't so that would've been funny to see
But Fresno wasn't so that would've been funny to see
Posted on 6/4/19 at 9:30 am to The Winner
Is this the thread where I tell you that Stanford's going to tear Miss State a new a-hole?
Posted on 6/4/19 at 9:33 am to East Coast Band
quote:
So funny that a state will prohibit travel to another US state, yet openly will travel to countries like China.
They have more similar political ideas with them.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 9:35 am to oman
quote:
Is this the thread where I tell you that Stanford's going to tear Miss State a new a-hole?
I think this is the reason for the travel ban in the first place. CA baws like anal sex and get offended by anyone that doesn't share their vision of wrecking assholes.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 9:37 am to johnnyrocket
I wonder how this would work for football season when Cal plays Ole Miss in Oxford. Cal is a public school right?
Posted on 6/4/19 at 9:39 am to oman
quote:This isn't Quiz Bowl, nerd
Is this the thread where I tell you that Stanford's going to tear Miss State a new a-hole?
Posted on 6/4/19 at 9:39 am to RebelRye
quote:
I wonder how this would work for football season when Cal plays Ole Miss in Oxford. Cal is a public school right?
That contract was in place before the ban, so it isn't affected.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 9:40 am to RebelRye
quote:
I wonder how this would work for football season when Cal plays Ole Miss in Oxford. Cal is a public school right?
I'm sure boosters would fund the road trip before any legal implications came into play. There are exceptions to the ban which include travel to maintain grant funding or licensure, or for auditing and revenue collection purposes. I'm not an attorney, but I would venture to say that Cal playing at Ole Miss would be included in revenue collection purposes considering the fact that they will receive a paycheck for the game being playing in Mississippi and the contract has already been signed previous to the enacted law.
This post was edited on 6/4/19 at 9:45 am
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News