Started By
Message
re: LSU Self Imposes Football Recruiting and Scholarship Restrictions
Posted on 12/16/10 at 10:00 pm to WDE24
Posted on 12/16/10 at 10:00 pm to WDE24
quote:
Yeah, sounds like it could have been major and nasty had they not dealt with it quickly. I think it involved impermissible recruiting and also something to do with a free or cheaper than should be apartment.
We threw in heygirl and DG pics as a bonus... Big deal.
0
Posted on 12/16/10 at 10:01 pm to memphisplaya
quote:
Means played in 9 games .
did he? somehow i thought he played 0. damn i feel retarded.
Posted on 12/16/10 at 10:01 pm to emanresu
quote:yep, the same NCAA finding were NCAA pres and former LSU Tiger Emmert said led to the conclusion that there was no wrongdoing by Cam and AU.
You mean the rumors and speculation that were actually confirmed by an NCAA finding?
Posted on 12/16/10 at 10:04 pm to m2pro
quote:
did he?
yep
Posted on 12/16/10 at 10:07 pm to WDE24
quote:fixed
Emmert said led to the conclusion that there was no evidence of wrongdoing by Cam and AU at this time.
There is a bit of a distinction.
Posted on 12/16/10 at 10:07 pm to AUTigLN11
quote:
quote:
they hope that LSU is cheating also
I don't care what LSU does, but they did cheat and now they are in trouble for it. It's not wild speculation and rumor mongering like has been going on for AU for the last six weeks.
You took what I said out of context, I don't have a pony in this show.
I'll put it like this: As far as I'm concerned, Auburn hasn't done anything wrong (Cam, on the other hand...?) as we know it. Also, neither has LSU, as a matter of fact they have done what they are suppose to do.
Again, I have no rooster in this cock fight.
Tired of the analogies?
Posted on 12/16/10 at 10:10 pm to WDE24
quote:
the same NCAA finding were NCAA pres and former LSU Tiger Emmert said led to the conclusion that there was no wrongdoing by Cam and AU.
bullshite. All he said was that there wasn't enough evidence to find Auburn guilty. Not that there was evidence that Auburn was innocent.
Posted on 12/16/10 at 10:12 pm to Robot Santa
I'm not saying LSU didn't do anything wrong I am just saying...... Emmert better dust off that file on his desk or there will be some restless corndogs down on the bayou
Posted on 12/16/10 at 10:12 pm to Roaad
quote:That is not what he said in his interview yesterday. It may be what he meant, but that isn't what he said.
fixed
There is a bit of a distinction.
Posted on 12/16/10 at 10:16 pm to WDE24
quote:I was referring to the official statements.
It may be what he meant, but that isn't what he said.
Didn't watch the interview, but heard the cliff's notes. I doubt that he meant to imply the investigation was completed.
Posted on 12/16/10 at 10:20 pm to Roaad
quote:Maybe, but he did specifically commend the enforcement staff for their investigation before saying based on the facts they were able to uncover there was no evidence of wrongdoing on the part of AU or Cam. Watching the interview it seemed like he was implying the investigation was all but over, but maybe that is not what he intended. It did give me a little more confidence to think that AU will not be penalized.
I doubt that he meant to imply the investigation was completed.
Posted on 12/16/10 at 10:22 pm to Robot Santa
quote:FWIW, it is nearly impossible to absolutely prove a negative in this case.
Robot Santa
Posted on 12/16/10 at 10:26 pm to WDE24
quote:is much much different than your earlier post:
there was no evidence of wrongdoing
quote:
led to the conclusion that there was no wrongdoing
quote:I think it is in limbo. It will resurface once Cam bolts this spring. Just like Bush, somebody will talk.
Watching the interview it seemed like he was implying the investigation was all but over
Posted on 12/16/10 at 10:28 pm to Roaad
quote:The result is the same, but yeah, that is why I clarified it.
is much much different than your earlier post:
Posted on 12/16/10 at 11:01 pm to WDE24
LSU fans have their 'heads in the sand'
If LSu gave up 2 schollys, they thought they could get a much harsher penalty. when teams self impose penalties, they dont over sanction themselves
This is bigger than what LSU fans think
If LSu gave up 2 schollys, they thought they could get a much harsher penalty. when teams self impose penalties, they dont over sanction themselves
This is bigger than what LSU fans think
Posted on 12/16/10 at 11:35 pm to CFBFAN1121
quote:National Championships:
Loss of Schollys due to NCAA violsations
LSU=2
Aub=0
LSU=3
AUB=0
Posted on 12/16/10 at 11:37 pm to CFBFAN1121
quote:
This is bigger than what LSU fans think
No, it's not at all. LSU runs a very clean program.
Posted on 12/16/10 at 11:43 pm to NIH
quote:
No, it's not at all. LSU runs a very clean program
"very clean programs" dont have to self impose penalties.
Posted on 12/16/10 at 11:54 pm to CFBFAN1121
quote:bullshite.
when teams self impose penalties, they dont over sanction themselves
Generally teams over-penalize themselves, they just try to direct punishment in a specific area. LSU WAAAAAAY overpenalized itself.
But, again, they are not nearly as experienced in the realm of NCAA sanctions as say. . .AU.
This post was edited on 12/16/10 at 11:57 pm
Posted on 12/16/10 at 11:57 pm to CFBFAN1121
actually you're wrong
Clean programs nip problems in the bud, dirty programs celebrate their cheating like they're fricking invincible.
Clean programs nip problems in the bud, dirty programs celebrate their cheating like they're fricking invincible.
Page 11 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News