Started By
Message
re: LSU is about to have to pay former Ole Miss players
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:39 pm to RebelExpress38
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:39 pm to RebelExpress38
F Ole Miss, obviously.Ross dellenger is a squirrelly mouthpiece
The SEC can foot the bill for being crybabies
The SEC can foot the bill for being crybabies
1
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:40 pm to Shaq4prez
We also run sports media
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:41 pm to donRANDOMnumbers
quote:
Are you a child?, or just retarded?
You have to be fricking stupid. The SEC did not entice these players to try to come back to college. Kiffin did that. Kiffin told these guys they would have a spot and they didn't. This will 100% fall on Kiffin and LSU and you have to be fricking stupid to think otherwise.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:41 pm to RB10
Didnt Coach Heaux admit they practiced with the team? Not a gotcha? Thought this was well known?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:42 pm to DMagic
quote:
We also run sports media
Holy shite. LSU fans are the new MSU fans circa Freeze Era
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:43 pm to pankReb
We’ve come full circle
Tiger rant is now EliteTigs
Tiger rant is now EliteTigs
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:43 pm to BoarEd
quote:the court told them they would have a spot and the SEC disallowed it. See how it looks from the other side of the coin?!????
Kiffin told these guys they would have a spot and they didn't.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:44 pm to Shaq4prez
So Kiffin never told them they would have a spot? Only the courts?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:45 pm to Shaq4prez
And it makes zero difference. Ole Miss eventually agreed with the SEC. After telling these guys they could play. This is on Kiffin and nobody else.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:45 pm to pankReb
quote:
LSU signed the contract with the promise of paying them
You have no fricking clue what those contracts say. This was likely contemplated.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:46 pm to pankReb
quote:
So Kiffin never told them they would have a spot? Only the courts?
If Kiffin told them they could, then the court told them they could, but the SEC said “No” and went scorched earth……
Explain how that doesn’t end in the SEC getting sued again. I’ll wait, because this should be good.
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 9:48 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:47 pm to DMagic
quote:. And this is relevant how? He was denied and ruled ineligible. He sued and got a TRSO to play until his case is heard. It being for a medical redshirt or for turning 30 makes no difference. They said he can’t play because he didn’t have eligibility left. Same thing for the kids who went and played summer league football. The main difference is, those guys actually have an argument to stand on as they technically have one year left as they were included in the new 5-5 rule as it included their class. Chambliss has really no stance other than to cry and hope to get some home cooking from a local judge as the NCAA has reviewed and heard his appeals but denied him twice for the medical redshirt shirt
Except it was a medical redshirt as the argument
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 9:53 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:49 pm to RB10
Because the players never had a financial agreement with the SEC.
If you sign a contract with a client, it is responsibility of the client to ensure that the work can be fulfilled. It is the responsibility of the client to ensure the legality of what they’re doing.
If you sign a contract with a client, it is responsibility of the client to ensure that the work can be fulfilled. It is the responsibility of the client to ensure the legality of what they’re doing.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:49 pm to coonass27
The Supreme Court also agreed with the judge and Chambliss will win on the merits or the ncaa will quit because the case is moot
We also run the judicial system
We also run the judicial system
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:51 pm to pankReb
Goddamn I love when the biggest retards on here pretend to be legal experts
Can’t wait to hear captdalton’s opinion
Can’t wait to hear captdalton’s opinion
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:52 pm to Sun God
You make arguments like you’ve never done anything more than W2 work.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:52 pm to coonass27
Are there no timeframes for these tro things to be heard or figured out?
Let me guess .. January??
Let me guess .. January??
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:52 pm to RebelExpress38
Man there are some dumb mother effers on this board. Remembering now why I don't normally post here
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:53 pm to The Pirate King
You’re an intellectual giant for sure
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:53 pm to pankReb
quote:
Because the players never had a financial agreement with the SEC.
I knew it would be good.
Explain how Pavia sued the SEC/ NCAA and won, all based on limiting his monetary opportunities. He didn’t have a contract with either of them, as you have so astutely pointed out.
These players will sue, and they will win. The only question is going to be how much the SEC has to pay.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News