Started By
Message
re: Lsu AD - other SEC AD's aren't being fair.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 11:52 am to Riseupfromtherubble
Posted on 3/20/14 at 11:52 am to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
You probably won't hear Nick say much more about it ,and didn't hear much about it until this offseason. Alleva has been singing this tune for a while.
If Saban complains about HUNH every offseason without any concrete data that it's detrimental to player health, then yea that would make him a bitch too
Oh so this offseason was the first time Saban complained about the pace of the game increasing?
1
Posted on 3/20/14 at 11:55 am to hawgfaninc
quote:Yeh, but too bad you got a crying little bith for a coach. We got a bitch AD, you got a bitch coach. Tough for both of us i guess
glad we got admiral long leading us to prosperity
Posted on 3/20/14 at 11:57 am to Alahunter
quote:
Lsu AD - other SEC AD's aren't being fair.
Perhaps we should get you a job writing headlines for Yahoo!
Posted on 3/20/14 at 11:58 am to Alahunter
alleva is so useless
Posted on 3/20/14 at 12:00 pm to Alahunter
quote:
"The only hope for change is for the (SEC) presidents to realize it's not an equitable schedule. They have to have the foresight and wisdom to change it."
How is it not equal? The big 3 play the big 3. Unless LSU wants to give back its big 3 status. Im sure the piggies would love to claim it.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 12:04 pm to craigbiggio
Alahunter making this thread and al.com posting that article
Posted on 3/20/14 at 12:05 pm to hg
quote:
Alahunter making this thread and al.com posting that article
Yes. An Alabama site picking up a quote from a Baton Rouge paper. Yet nothing on the Tiger Rant about it.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 12:07 pm to Alahunter
LSU bitching about scheduling?
Welcome to the off-season everybody.
Welcome to the off-season everybody.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 12:07 pm to spslayto
quote:
An Alabama site picking up a quote from a Baton Rouge paper.
They're just appeasing to their base.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 12:12 pm to CaptainBrannigan
quote:
How is it not equal?
some schedules are more equal than others
Posted on 3/20/14 at 12:20 pm to Mirthomatic
quote:
I'm not so sure. If the selection committee operates much like current AP and Coaches poll voters, extra losses actually do hurt worse than quality wins help. That's why so many schools schedule cupcakes now. If a team takes a loss, even if they have had impressive wins, and even if the squad they lost to is good, then that team usually drops below many or most of the undefeated teams. Even the undefeated teams that have played only creampuffs.
And teams that lose to ULL don't deserve to be in the picture, anyway.
But if they operate like the NCAA basketball committee, which seems likely, then the dynamic changes enormously. Instead of a bunch of harried SIDs glancing at the scores inbetween meetings, we'll have a group of people dedicated specifically to evaluating teams and schedules and, just as importantly, discussing their evaluations with others. That tends to make for detail-oriented analysis. Keep in mind that the basketball committee just kept a ranked team out of the tourney because they didn't think the RPI was good enough. There's ample reason to assume a football committee will be equally unforgiving of playing creampuffs, win or lose.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 12:20 pm to Alahunter
The best thing for everyone is a nine game schedule. He's right the ADs won't do what's best.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 12:21 pm to Alahunter
quote:
"The only hope for change is for the (SEC) presidents to realize it's not fair for LSU to have to play Florida."
Yeah we heard you the first 1,000,000 times you bitched about it buddy.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 12:27 pm to randomways
quote:
Well, it's not an "extra" loss in itself, it's just another SEC loss. In that case, the potential benefits are pretty much equal to the potential detriments.
yeah...no
Posted on 3/20/14 at 12:31 pm to MetryTyger
There it fricking is! The mother fricker of all melts! Shine on you crazy diamond!
Posted on 3/20/14 at 12:33 pm to bbap
quote:
yeah...no
Wow. I can see you put every last available iota of your brainpower into your counterargument. No, I'm not being sarcastic. I sincerely believe you did. It's okay -- my sister has a kid like you, and he's just the most cheerful boy in spite of the harsh hand fate and extra chromosomes dealt him.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 12:33 pm to spacewrangler
you can call him a whiny bitch but you cant actually refute what he has to say.
does the baseball schedule have permanent opponents? of course not, because logically it doesnt make sense.
with that said i dont mind it the way it is and i am fine with it staying.
but simply calling alleva a whiny little bitch doesnt really do a whole lot to make people consider your opinion. its just comes off as childish.
does the baseball schedule have permanent opponents? of course not, because logically it doesnt make sense.
with that said i dont mind it the way it is and i am fine with it staying.
but simply calling alleva a whiny little bitch doesnt really do a whole lot to make people consider your opinion. its just comes off as childish.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 12:35 pm to randomways
quote:
Wow. I can see you put every last available iota of your brainpower into your counterargument.
its so obviously that it would hurt conference teams from reaching the playoff moreso than help i didnt think elaborating was at all necessary. its straight up common sense.
but nice job on the retard insults. it shows me what im dealing with.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 12:38 pm to bbap
quote:
its so obviously that it would hurt conference teams from reaching the playoff moreso than help i didnt think elaborating was at all necessary. its straight up common sense.
but nice job on the retard insults. it shows me what im dealing with.
Still working on that counterargument, I see. The thing about the "it[']s so obvious" approach is that it's so obvious that's just a way to pretend you have a meaningful reply without actually offering one. The other person who replied to me did so intelligently. You just went with the most banal of responses...twice now.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 12:43 pm to bbap
quote:
its so obviously that it would hurt conference teams from reaching the playoff moreso than help i didnt think elaborating was at all necessary. its straight up common sense.
People don't understand that the SEC won't get left out of the playoff and it won't get two teams in. 8 games, 9 games, it makes no difference. It's a zero sum game. What 9 games does it force ADs to have more exciting matchups, and less double directionals. There is a chronic problem that scheduling too many power puffs is going to create, and I hope someone like Slive with common sense forces the SEC to go to 9 games even when coaches and ADs bitch. Remember, they all bitched about the SEC Championship Game for the same reason they're bitching about 9 games.
Page 3 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News