Started By
Message
re: John Bond to release tapes in two weeks....
Posted on 2/28/11 at 3:09 pm to JPLSU1981
Posted on 2/28/11 at 3:09 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
Some will say "if there's proof Cam knew, why has the NCAA still done nothing?" My answer would be that I think it is impatient and incorrect to assume at this point that the NCAA has done nothing. The NCAA is in the midst of a pretty intensive investigation of all things Auburn, and I'd be highly surprised if something doesn't come from all of this within the next 1-3 years. Will it be specifically related to the Newton situation? maybe, maybe not, but the Newton investigation certainly kickstarted an NCAA probe of Auburn recruiting, that's for sure.
If the NCAA had anything on Auburn at the time Newton was reinstated he would not have been reinstated simple as that. Do you think the NCAA president is out of touch with his field investigators? Auburn's Rich McGlynn has worked with the NCAA very well with this Newton saga, considering his background I have no worries.
Posted on 2/28/11 at 3:09 pm to DeltaDoc
If the NCAA had evidence that Cam might have known, I think it boils down to the NCAA wanting to have more evidence implicating Auburn before crashing Auburn's party based on something that seemingly had nothing to with Auburn on its face. It was probably not an easy decision to make based on the public's demand for accountability, but I can at least understand the potential reluctance on the NCAA's part to come down on Auburn given the circustances.
Posted on 2/28/11 at 3:10 pm to rangers911
quote:
If the NCAA had anything on Auburn at the time Newton was reinstated he would not have been reinstated simple as that
The reinstatement committee is separate from the enforcement and investigative. They reinstated based on the information Auburn provided to them.
Posted on 2/28/11 at 3:10 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
There could be a number of reasons, but here are a few:
1. $$$
2. potential to look like the "bad guy" bringing down the SEC in a sense
3. the potential his school (MSU) could continue to be wrapped up in this thing
4. he didn't hide the evidence, he turned it over to the NCAA and they've still done nothing about it and he's growing restless
5. He's been approached by so many people that want the tapes, it's just taken time to figure out who to allow access to them
1. I don't know which is worse, a recruit receiving the $$$, or someone trying to make money from it.
2. He already looks like a fool.
3. That's stupid. Anyone with intelligence, who's concerned about getting their feet wet, isn't gonna go traipsing along a river bank.
4. If he's not hiding evidence, he needs to keep his flappin' mouth shut until all the proper channels for investigating the matter have been exhausted.
5. There's only one proper channel, at this time, with authority to investigate and determine whether there is any violation.
I'm not making excuses for anyone. He's just full of shite.
This post was edited on 2/28/11 at 3:33 pm
Posted on 2/28/11 at 3:11 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
Most reasonable people know that Cam Newton was shopped around AND that Cam likely knew about it. There are very few people, if any, that dispute either of those things. So the tapes really don't change a whole lot IMO.
Maybe I'm wrong... but my impression is that the Auburn fans do not want to admit Cam knew what was going on (or at least the large majority of the Auburn fans)
quote:
Some will say "if there's proof Cam knew, why has the NCAA still done nothing?" My answer would be that I think it is impatient and incorrect to assume at this point that the NCAA has done nothing.
Personally I think they are doing a wide ranging investigation of Auburn but I don't think they have had a tape demonstrating Cam was directly involved... I think the investigation will roll along slowly and what they can prove will be dependent on what credible circumstantial evidence they can put together
Posted on 2/28/11 at 3:12 pm to molsusports
quote:
Maybe I'm wrong... but my impression is that the Auburn fans do not want to admit Cam knew what was going on (or at least the large majority of the Auburn fans)
You've been trolling around AE too often. Nobody is naive enough to believe that's the case.
Posted on 2/28/11 at 3:12 pm to Aman
quote:Disclaimer: I haven't read this whole thread and am only answering this one question. Do not assume more than is typed.
Why did it take five years for the NCAA to hammer USC? I seem to remember emails or other communications coming to light in that case years after Bush left USC.
If I recall correctly, the NCAA investigation into Bush was delayed by the fact that Bush had graduated, multiple sports became involved and, most notably, ther was a civil suit filed at the heart of the Bush allegations. I believe the NCAA was trying to wait for the Reggie Bush deposition to take place in that case. That deposition was delayed multiple times and then a settlment reached to avoid the deposition. My facts may be a little off, because I am basing this on memory of investigation that I didn't closely follow, but I think that is accurate.
Posted on 2/28/11 at 3:13 pm to beaver
quote:
If the NCAA had it do you think they'd let him go rouge and give it to a radio station?
How could the NCAA stop him from playing his own tapes? The NCAA is not a governmental office
Posted on 2/28/11 at 3:17 pm to Ross
quote:
Maybe I'm wrong... but my impression is that the Auburn fans do not want to admit Cam knew what was going on (or at least the large majority of the Auburn fans)
You've been trolling around AE too often. Nobody is naive enough to believe that's the case.
I've actually never visited AE
It just seems to me every time you make a safe assumption like Cam had to know (given cecil was asking and they were close)... you get a rebuttal from boogers saying something like "prove it"
It's never the response they'd have it was any other school... more like "ya, seems like he'd have to know"
Posted on 2/28/11 at 3:18 pm to rangers911
quote:
Auburn's Rich McGlynn has worked with the NCAA very well with this Newton saga, considering his background I have no worries.
I just don't think any program could survive the scrutiny that Auburn will be under for the time being from not only the NCAA and its investigators, but also from national and local media and its investigators. And let's be honest ... it's not like Auburn is a "sqeaky clean" program to begin with (no SEC program is).
You may be right about the Newton case, though. The NCAA very well may never be able to penalize Auburn for Newton for a variety of reasons. But you can bet that if they can't get Auburn on Newton, the NCAA is not going to like being made to look like an impotent fool in this whole process.
This post was edited on 2/28/11 at 3:22 pm
Posted on 2/28/11 at 3:22 pm to Alahunter
quote:
They reinstated based on the information Auburn provided to them.
True, but why after the fact did they say they would have ruled the same way. Yes it may have been because of Auburn's investigation. But the prez has said he would have ruled the same. So your argument about they only ruled based on AU's investigation seems flawed
This post was edited on 2/28/11 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 2/28/11 at 3:24 pm to DeltaDoc
quote:
Agree. If what Bond is saying is true, then the underlying premise is that the SEC and NCAA intentionally lied to the entire country about not having any evidence of Cam knowing that he was being shopped.
Therefore, if the NCAA is proven to be a liar on such a grand scale, you almost have to either (a) disband the NCAA and start from scratch in view of what has transpired and its national championship implications, or (b) fire everyone of authority in the NCAA and SEC from Emmert and Slive on down.
It makes no sense and therefore, I think Bond is the one that ends up looking like a complete fool. He has been saying for a month now that he is going to release tapes. It is either not going to happen or it is going to not be anywhere near the revelations that they are claiming.
This and I feel they may not have anything to prove what is on an audio tape to be true. It has happened in the past with other schools. Just because it is on an audio tape doesnt mean they can prove it.
Posted on 2/28/11 at 3:26 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
True, but why after the fact did they say they would have ruled the same way. Yes it may have been because of Auburn's investigation. But the prez has said he would have ruled the same. So your argument about they only ruled based on AU's investigation seeas flawed
except that the NCAA website says that is how the Reinstatement committee works, you'd have an argument.
Posted on 2/28/11 at 3:27 pm to John Merlyn
And in two weeks he will say that JB has rescheduled the release until the following week.
John and Co would not make it on the WPT. 


Posted on 2/28/11 at 3:29 pm to Alahunter
I'm sorry, I understand that's how it works, but there is no way I could see Emmert allowing it if he HAD the tapes
Risk of egg on his face would be too high
Risk of egg on his face would be too high
Posted on 2/28/11 at 3:29 pm to Alahunter
May be how it works, but they do take other things into account. Otherwise everyone would say they were innocent and they would always rule in favor of the school. Again flawed Kind of like if I killed someone but when we went to court the only heard my lawyers account of what happened.
Posted on 2/28/11 at 3:30 pm to NYCAuburn
The NCAA said that Cecil solicited money from MSU>.. they did that at the same time as Cam's reinstatement... So what can the tapes prove... this talk of the NCAA not including all the information they have is a joke... If the info was given to Auburn, the info was given to the NCAA...
Auburn has limited the athletic access to Newton's father, Cecil Newton. Mississippi State disassociated itself from former player Kenny Rogers, who, with Cecil Newton, tried to "actively market" Cam Newton to Mississippi State.
The SEC said:
"The conduct of Cam Newton's father and the involved individual is unacceptable and has no place in the SEC or in intercollegiate athletics," said SEC Commissioner Mike Slive. "The actions taken by Auburn University and Mississippi State University make it clear this behavior will not be tolerated in the SEC."
Here are some details from the NCAA:
When a school discovers an NCAA rules violation has occurred, it must declare the student-athlete ineligible and may request the student-athlete's eligibility be reinstated. Reinstatement decisions are made by the NCAA national office staff and can include conditions such as withholding from competition and repayment of extra benefits. Newton was reinstated without any conditions.
According to facts of the case agreed upon by Auburn University and the NCAA enforcement staff, the student-athlete's father and an owner of a scouting service worked together to actively market the student-athlete as a part of a pay-for-play scenario in return for Newton's commitment to attend college and play football. NCAA rules (Bylaw 12.3.3) do not allow individuals or entities to represent a prospective student-athlete for compensation to a school for an athletic scholarship.
In conjunction with the case, Auburn University has limited the access Newton's father has to the athletics program and Mississippi State has disassociated the involved individual.
LINK
Auburn has limited the athletic access to Newton's father, Cecil Newton. Mississippi State disassociated itself from former player Kenny Rogers, who, with Cecil Newton, tried to "actively market" Cam Newton to Mississippi State.
The SEC said:
"The conduct of Cam Newton's father and the involved individual is unacceptable and has no place in the SEC or in intercollegiate athletics," said SEC Commissioner Mike Slive. "The actions taken by Auburn University and Mississippi State University make it clear this behavior will not be tolerated in the SEC."
Here are some details from the NCAA:
When a school discovers an NCAA rules violation has occurred, it must declare the student-athlete ineligible and may request the student-athlete's eligibility be reinstated. Reinstatement decisions are made by the NCAA national office staff and can include conditions such as withholding from competition and repayment of extra benefits. Newton was reinstated without any conditions.
According to facts of the case agreed upon by Auburn University and the NCAA enforcement staff, the student-athlete's father and an owner of a scouting service worked together to actively market the student-athlete as a part of a pay-for-play scenario in return for Newton's commitment to attend college and play football. NCAA rules (Bylaw 12.3.3) do not allow individuals or entities to represent a prospective student-athlete for compensation to a school for an athletic scholarship.
In conjunction with the case, Auburn University has limited the access Newton's father has to the athletics program and Mississippi State has disassociated the involved individual.
LINK
Posted on 2/28/11 at 3:33 pm to JPLSU1981
It's really pretty simple:
The NCAA did what it had to do to put all this off until after the season. In no way did they want to have to deal with making Newton ineligible, face appeals in court from Auburn, and all the bad publicity from it while the wound was fresh. Not to mention the ratings hit and lost revenue from TCU playing for the NC.
Now, the NCAA can come back and say that they followed the guidelines it had set up and there was nothing they could do at the time. The wound wont be as fresh now that it's in the past and out of season.
Auburn- found out they were fricked with or without Newton. If he sits, you arent going to win it and still get sanctions. If he plays? You might win it and get sanctions. They decided to go "All IN"
State? You're tired of Slime hiding all the shite and you go straight to the NCAA. Then you see the NCAA dragging its feet and your still getting dragged down some in all this mess. So you tell Bond to release the tapes and clear the University's name. Other schools wont be able to say anything negative in recruiting anymore, and the public is outraged about what Auburn did.
The NCAA did what it had to do to put all this off until after the season. In no way did they want to have to deal with making Newton ineligible, face appeals in court from Auburn, and all the bad publicity from it while the wound was fresh. Not to mention the ratings hit and lost revenue from TCU playing for the NC.
Now, the NCAA can come back and say that they followed the guidelines it had set up and there was nothing they could do at the time. The wound wont be as fresh now that it's in the past and out of season.
Auburn- found out they were fricked with or without Newton. If he sits, you arent going to win it and still get sanctions. If he plays? You might win it and get sanctions. They decided to go "All IN"
State? You're tired of Slime hiding all the shite and you go straight to the NCAA. Then you see the NCAA dragging its feet and your still getting dragged down some in all this mess. So you tell Bond to release the tapes and clear the University's name. Other schools wont be able to say anything negative in recruiting anymore, and the public is outraged about what Auburn did.
Posted on 2/28/11 at 3:33 pm to beaver
I agree with your point about Emmert. I don't think the NCAA is "hiding" any evidence they may have seen/heard. I think either:
A) NCAA never heard these particular tapes
Or
B) the NCAA did hear these tapes and there is not enough evidence on them proving Cam knew
A) NCAA never heard these particular tapes
Or
B) the NCAA did hear these tapes and there is not enough evidence on them proving Cam knew
Posted on 2/28/11 at 3:35 pm to CoonassBulldog
quote:NCAA neither benefits nor loses based upon the BCSCG.
Not to mention the ratings hit and lost revenue from TCU playing for the NC.
The NCAA does not get any direct revenue from the game nor from the tv broadcast, as the football championship is not an NCAA event.
Popular
Back to top
