Started By
Message
re: Is Texas really a blue blood?
Posted on 2/21/20 at 10:27 am to OldSchoolHorn
Posted on 2/21/20 at 10:27 am to OldSchoolHorn
10 pages minimum.
0
Posted on 2/21/20 at 10:38 am to MStant1
quote:/If top 10 = blueblood, then LSU would qualify now.
I mean when you consider all-time records, wins, bowl games, etc. we are in the top 10.
Posted on 2/21/20 at 10:48 am to agswin
quote:
And the SWC. How many schools can say they have screwed up two conferences. If it had not been for the Aggies they would have screwed up (even worse than it is now) the PAC 12.
It takes real egotism to do that.
I don't know about the egotism, but you can tell who the bitches are by the ones who ran off and still whine about it.
Posted on 2/21/20 at 10:51 am to PurpleandGeauld
quote:
/If top 10 = blueblood, then LSU would qualify now.
Lol.. how many of the categories is LSU top 10, regardless of the merit towards the topic?
Conf Champs? No
All time wins? No
Winning %? No
You get my point
LSU is New Money & there is absolutely nothing wrong with that, ask a Nebraska fan.
Posted on 2/21/20 at 10:56 am to texashorn
quote:
Based on AP poll points...
quote:
No. 1 team of 2000s
LSU, Florida and USC were better in the 2000s. 2 National Titles >>> 1.
Posted on 2/21/20 at 11:10 am to OldSchoolHorn
quote:
Lol.. how many of the categories is LSU top 10, regardless of the merit towards the topic?
Conf Champs? No
All time wins? No
Winning %? No
You get my point
LSU is New Money & there is absolutely nothing wrong with that, ask a Nebraska fan.
Fair enough.
Posted on 2/21/20 at 11:20 am to GoGators04
quote:
They also only have 3 Big XII titles
That's absolutely insane. I had to look it up as I didn't believe it.
quote:
also only have 3 Big XII titles and 2 Heismans
Posted on 2/21/20 at 11:20 am to GoGators04
Third in all time wins plus 4 natties. Blue Blood
Posted on 2/21/20 at 11:46 am to thatthang
OU owns us. Half the time or more we beat them, they still win the conference.
Posted on 2/21/20 at 11:52 am to MStant1
I’d rather be LSU than @ least three of the BB’s. Gates>Rockefeller all day long.. DGAF about what happened b4 I was alive.
Posted on 2/21/20 at 11:53 am to GoGators04
quote:
They were also awful in the 80s and 90s
Their '83 team would won the NC had they not lost to UGA in the Cotton Bowl.
Loads of talent.Had 18 guys drafted the next spring.Still think it's a record.
Posted on 2/21/20 at 11:55 am to OldSchoolHorn
quote:I mean when you play in weak conferences your win's/win% are going to be high. Texas basically had only to beat Oklahoma to win a conf champ. Say what you want, if Texas had been in the SEC, your wins/win% would be much lower.
Lol.. how many of the categories is LSU top 10, regardless of the merit towards the topic?
You are only 9-8-1 against us, and we are going to bring that even later this year baw. How does it feel Mr. Blueblood, having such a poor showing against a lowly non-blueblood like LSU?
EDT: Against the traditional bluebloods LSU has been mostly competitive. Bama and Nebraska has owned us, but against the other 6 we are roughly even: Okla 2-1, Ohio St 1-1-1, USC 1-1, Texas 8-9-1, Notre Dame 5-7, Mich 0-0.
This post was edited on 2/21/20 at 12:07 pm
Posted on 2/21/20 at 12:02 pm to r2d2
Texas is ( 3-8-1 ) all time versus Vanderbilt.
Posted on 2/21/20 at 12:07 pm to PurpleandGeauld
Texas is 7-1-1 against the greatest program of all time & as next post added.. 3-8-1 vs Vandy.
It's all relative to era.. go back to Texas' record vs the SEC overall over the years & "if you weren't playing in a week conference" rhetoric becomes laughable.
Problem is most posters aren't familiar with CFB history, data analysis or are just plain dumb.
It's all relative to era.. go back to Texas' record vs the SEC overall over the years & "if you weren't playing in a week conference" rhetoric becomes laughable.
Problem is most posters aren't familiar with CFB history, data analysis or are just plain dumb.
Posted on 2/21/20 at 12:13 pm to r2d2
quote:
National Champions. Very objective.
Only for about the last 20 years, and even then there has been controversy (2003).
Posted on 2/21/20 at 12:14 pm to OldSchoolHorn
LSU has a winning record against every team in the big12 except our 8-9-1 record to you. Guess we would have won a bunch more conf champs if we were over there...
Posted on 2/21/20 at 12:15 pm to OldSchoolHorn
quote:
Texas is 7-1-1 against the greatest program of all time & as next post added.. 3-8-1 vs Vandy.
It's all relative to era.. go back to Texas' record vs the SEC overall over the years & "if you weren't playing in a week conference" rhetoric becomes laughable.
Problem is most posters aren't familiar with CFB history, data analysis or are just plain dumb.
Does Texas ever plan on getting that win back from Kirksville Osteopath?
Posted on 2/21/20 at 12:16 pm to Belue2Scott
quote:
Texas is ( 3-8-1 ) all time versus Vanderbilt.
And 7-1-1 against Alabama.
Posted on 2/21/20 at 12:17 pm to RollTide1987
quote:There is no controversy about 2003. We won the Natty on the field. Isn't that what you bammers like to say? Winning on the field is what counts? We have the crystal ball. USC won a "political statement" that was later vacated.
there has been controversy (2003).
This post was edited on 2/21/20 at 12:19 pm
Posted on 2/21/20 at 1:42 pm to texashorn
Broadway crossed the goal line in the OB, your QB touched the sideline in the Cotton Bowl, and but, but, but my Colt McCoy! RTR
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News