Started By
Message
re: Is it time to re-align the conference to make it more geographically correct
Posted on 11/1/16 at 9:26 am to El Campo Tiger
Posted on 11/1/16 at 9:26 am to El Campo Tiger
Just switch Auburn and Zoo, set up AU and Bama every year and limit UTs arse whoppins from Bama to every 4 or 5 years.
It's the humane thing to do
It's the humane thing to do
0
Posted on 11/1/16 at 9:27 am to MeatCleaverWeaver
There will never be an alignment where Bama doesn't play both Auburn and UT every year. So at least try to be realistic when coming up with conference realignment possibilities.
Posted on 11/1/16 at 9:29 am to bbrownso
quote:
That's not right geographically speaking.
Why is it important that it be exactly geographically correct?
Posted on 11/1/16 at 9:30 am to damnstrongfan
Just go ahead and admit that your scared of Florida and Bama.
Posted on 11/1/16 at 9:43 am to UAtide11
quote:
If certain teams weren't scared of bowl eligibility, we could go to a 9 games conference schedule.
Why doesn't Bama want to play in a division with Auburn, Florida, Tennessee and Georgia?
Posted on 11/1/16 at 10:11 am to lsu711
quote:
Why doesn't Bama want to play in a division with Auburn, Florida, Tennessee and Georgia?
LOL Oh I'm sure it would break your heart for LSU to lose Alabama and Auburn to the East.
Posted on 11/1/16 at 10:22 am to lsu711
quote:
Why doesn't Bama want to play in a division with Auburn, Florida, Tennessee and Georgia?
So you want 5 of the 6 best programs in the conference in the same division and one (conveniently, your team) in the other.
How in the frick is that better than what we currently have?
9 conference games on the other hand is totally realistic. The Pac-12, Big 12, and Big10 already do it. The ACC is trying to do it, but Notre Dame presents a few problems.
Posted on 11/1/16 at 10:24 am to TexTgrTed
quote:
What disgusts us is the SEC forcing every-year, other division opponents on the other 10 teams to "save" Bammer/UThug & Aub/UGA.
Still crying about having to play Florida?
Posted on 11/1/16 at 10:37 am to damnstrongfan
quote:
West: A&M, LSU, Mizzou, Ole Miss, Miss St., Vandy, Arky.
East: Bama, Auburn, Georgia, Florida, USC, Kentucky, Tennessee.
or just wait for the Big 12 to implode and we can have
West: A&M, LSU, Arky, Mizzou, Ole Miss, Miss St, OU, Kansas
East: Bama, Auburn, Georgia, Florida, USC, Kentucky, Tennessee, Vandy
Posted on 11/1/16 at 11:21 am to UAtide11
quote:
How in the frick is that better than what we currently have?
Better for LSU, Miss St, Ole Miss, Arkansas, A&M, Missouri.
Worse for Bama. That's it. Can't do it.
Posted on 11/1/16 at 11:22 am to damnstrongfan
Uh no. Have you looked at what the West would look like? Makes for a pretty meh season.
Posted on 11/1/16 at 11:26 am to mikeb0870
Now that's a good one. LOL.
This post was edited on 11/1/16 at 11:26 am
Posted on 11/1/16 at 11:27 am to damnstrongfan
quote:
West: A&M, LSU, Mizzou, Ole Miss, Miss St., Vandy, Arky.
Pussies.
Posted on 11/1/16 at 11:29 am to damnstrongfan
Didn't read OP cause it's a bad idea.
Posted on 11/1/16 at 7:18 pm to southernboisb
You never play cross division games until the SEC Championship. You still only play 8 conference games.
Posted on 11/1/16 at 7:37 pm to damnstrongfan
Vanderbilt missouri to the American conference
Posted on 11/1/16 at 7:39 pm to lsu711
quote:
Why doesn't Bama want to play in a division with Auburn, Florida, Tennessee and Georgia?
Why doesn't LSU want to play in the same division as Bama?
Posted on 11/1/16 at 7:40 pm to agswin
quote:
Not a fair re-alignment. West would have two powerhouses (Arkansas and A&M)
So what do you call a powerhouse that's get owned by said other in your words?
I'll be waiting on the 12th of never for the answer.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News