Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:09 pm to Buckeye06
quote:
The only argument, someone legitimate IMO, against Bama is they shouldnt have had the chance to play for the title in 2011
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:10 pm to EvilVodka
Is this thread 5 pages of LSU fans bitching and whining?
It is?
K, well bye.
It is?
K, well bye.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:11 pm to genro
quote:He's is just throwing shite against the wall to try to prove his point. He's failing miserably.
Oklahoma (2002-2012) conference record: 73-17 (.811)
Alabama (2008-2012) conference record: 35-5 (.875)
Idiot
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:11 pm to hsqb
Only one LSU fan
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:11 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
You know you are on the wrong side of an argument about Bama when the Auburn fans disagree with you.
Well, NYC also doesn't fall into the trappings of the whole "They ain't no dynasty cuz they's mah rival!" mindset.
You know... because he's actually intelligent and shite.
This post was edited on 5/14/13 at 4:12 pm
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:11 pm to EvilVodka
Bama is mid-dynasty, bro. When this run is over, I promise you'll know the answer.. 
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:11 pm to Marty McFrat
Alabama is part of the SEC dynasty. They are only one of many SEC teams that have made the SEC the preeminent college football conference since 2006 without question.
In 2012, if not for TAM’s loss to Florida, which Alabama conveniently misses most years, they would have finished second in the SEC West.
In 2011, Alabama got a second chance at a crystal ball without winning their SEC divisional crown or conference championship--king sized fluke.
While Alabama has managed to win three BCS Championships in the past four years, they only did it in a dominate fashion in 2009.
In my mind, one truly dominant season does not make for a dynasty.
A team from the SEC would have probably won the last couple of years even if Bama had not. The true dynasty belongs to the SEC—not Bama.
In 2012, if not for TAM’s loss to Florida, which Alabama conveniently misses most years, they would have finished second in the SEC West.
In 2011, Alabama got a second chance at a crystal ball without winning their SEC divisional crown or conference championship--king sized fluke.
While Alabama has managed to win three BCS Championships in the past four years, they only did it in a dominate fashion in 2009.
In my mind, one truly dominant season does not make for a dynasty.
A team from the SEC would have probably won the last couple of years even if Bama had not. The true dynasty belongs to the SEC—not Bama.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:13 pm to Buckeye06
quote:
The only argument, someone legitimate IMO, against Bama is they shouldn't have had the chance to play for the title in 2011, which would obviously put a huge damper on the dynasty
They have lost at home each of the last 2 years, which is interesting in it's own right
I think they are dynasty material; everyone needs some help once in a while
I also think they are dynasty material, but I don't think they've achieved a "dynasty" yet...all of these Alabama fans on here can't put together anything past 3/4.
I don't agree that dynasties need help...I believe that consistent dominance is a characteristic of a dynasty...
This Alabama "dynasty" has needed help on a consistent basis...they've often got the benefit of the doubt ahead of other teams based on media perception the last two years especially. In 2011, they got a rematch despite not even playing for their conference championship, and then last year, they get in ahead of Florida, who had the same record, for winning the SEC! Hell, why did Florida have no shot at the National Championship last year?? same argument as Bama the year before...
Alabama dominated LSU in the 2011 National Championship, but lost at home during the regular season and failed to win the SEC
Alabama wins the SEC in '12, and gets matched up with a team that probably didn't even belong in the top 10
They've had two dominating National Title appearances, but have struggled to remain undefeated each of those years...
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:13 pm to Sheetbend
Who's alter are you?
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:13 pm to Sheetbend
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:13 pm to Sheetbend
quote:Prior to 2012, Alabama had played Florida 4 years in a row.
In 2012, if not for TAM’s loss to Florida, which Alabama conveniently misses most years, they would have finished second in the SEC West.
quote:LSU got a third chance in 2007. Oklahoma also didn't win their conference one season and still made the BCSNC.
In 2011, Alabama got a second chance at a crystal ball without winning their SEC divisional crown or conference championship--king sized fluke.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:14 pm to Sheetbend
quote:
They are only one of many SEC teams that have made the SEC the preeminent college football conference since 2003 without question.
FIFY
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:14 pm to EvilVodka
Dude you got absolutely owned on the last page. Quit changing your argument every time you get proven wrong.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:14 pm to EvilVodka
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:16 pm to TreyAnastasio
Yes.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:16 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
I just did, and what am I supposed to be impressed about?
I'd say the wins over OU by 34 and wins at A&M and Texas
If I recall, and I don't have time to verify this, but OSU played like 8 teams with a winning record, and Bama played 3.
I am saying Bama is a dynasty, they were the best team in CFB the last 2 years, but IMO didn't deserve to play for the National Title in 2011.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:16 pm to Patton
quote:
Clearly losing to Iowa state is more respectable than losing to LSU
Clearly, winning your conference is better than NOT winning your conference....
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:17 pm to EvilVodka
quote:
Clearly, winning your conference is better than NOT winning your conference....
That depends on which conference you won.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 4:18 pm to Buckeye06
quote:You're being deliberately obtuse. You know as well as I do that 6-6 in the SEC >>>>>>>>> 7-5 in the Big 12
If I recall, and I don't have time to verify this, but OSU played like 8 teams with a winning record, and Bama played 3.
Page 6 of 34
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News