Started By
Message

re: I'm not sold on Georgia

Posted on 7/16/18 at 4:18 pm to
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
42523 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

We return a lot of experience on defense, and our backfield is absolutely loaded with an even better OL. You're an ignorant twat.



I think the defense comment is understandable. We lose 6 starters and 9 out of our top 15 tacklers from last season.
Posted by Cincinnati Bowtie
Sparta
Member since May 2008
11951 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 4:22 pm to
They’re going to be good for a very long time and weren’t overrated last year at all.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

2012 Florida was monumentally more talented than this Carolina team, particularly in defense.


Yeah, people really don't understand how much raw talent Muschamp either failed to develop or just outright mismanaged. Even so, he used his offense to keep the defense well rested and it was less about scoring points, more about shortening the game.

I personally think Muschamp defenses are woefully overrated, and I think McElwain setting the defensive record for least amount of yards ever by Florida (FCS and FBS included) speaks more volumes than anything else.
Posted by ALA2262
Cumming, GA
Member since Jun 2016
1683 posts
Posted on 7/17/18 at 7:03 am to
quote:

I think the defense comment is understandable. We lose 6 starters and 9 out of our top 15 tacklers from last season.


Exactly. You return but 54% of your defensive production. The same statement about Bama, which returns 53%, would be understandable.

LINK


Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27297 posts
Posted on 7/17/18 at 9:01 am to
quote:

Yeah, people really don't understand how much raw talent Muschamp either failed to develop or just outright mismanaged.


How did fail to "develop"? He coached/recruited tons of
defensive players that were drafted including multiple
#1's.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79179 posts
Posted on 7/17/18 at 9:13 am to
I'm sold on UGA as a present-year contender and on Kirby as an elite recruiter

I'm not sold on UGA/Kirby as the next to join Alabama and Clemson in the category of consistently elite. That doesn't mean I'm positive it won't happen, but I question whether Kirby will be able to reach that level of consistency.

Of course, there are few schools in the country that SHOULD be better situated for 10-14 win consistency than UGA. Some of that may depend on when/if UF and UT become competitive programs again.
Posted by jgata
TN
Member since Jul 2018
61 posts
Posted on 7/17/18 at 9:16 am to
I'm not sold on Georgia because they ALWAYS shite the bed.


Usually in Jacksonville.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32855 posts
Posted on 7/17/18 at 9:17 am to
quote:

there are few schools in the country that SHOULD be better situated for 10-14 win consistency than UGA. Some of that may depend on when/if UF and UT become competitive programs again.


Are you saying the vols and gators should be consistently better than uga?
Posted by TheCoach81
Member since Jul 2018
396 posts
Posted on 7/17/18 at 9:23 am to
Let’s say Georgia took a step back. Even with a step back they would be a step ahead of LSU.


Thread over
Posted by jgata
TN
Member since Jul 2018
61 posts
Posted on 7/17/18 at 9:23 am to
This should have been Georgia for the last 2 decades, but underachievement is in their blood, so you get a boatload of 10 win seasons and bowl wins over Hawaii.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32855 posts
Posted on 7/17/18 at 9:47 am to
Richt just didn’t have it in him.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79179 posts
Posted on 7/17/18 at 9:49 am to
quote:

Are you saying the vols and gators should be consistently better than uga?



huh?

No, I'm saying that UF and UT being better (better meaning improved from prior years) football programs could impact UGA's ability to pile up high win totals every year.

Although I certainly think there is an argument that UF should be on UGA's level, or higher, considering it's a big, well funded school with relatively recent history of high football success in a wealthy, high-talent state. There's obviously no similar argument for Tennessee.

When you look at the most practical considerations (not historical achievement or intangibles), UF and UGA should probably top the SEC in football potential.
This post was edited on 7/17/18 at 9:50 am
Posted by OKTGR580
Baton Rouge to Houston, TX
Member since Apr 2018
6318 posts
Posted on 7/17/18 at 9:49 am to
If Auburn didn’t have their backs all banged up from the iron bowl, they would have won the national championship. Fact
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32855 posts
Posted on 7/17/18 at 9:52 am to
Thanks for the clarification.
Posted by UnderDog68
Thomasville, Ga.
Member since Sep 2017
2540 posts
Posted on 7/17/18 at 10:03 am to
quote:

If Auburn didn’t have their backs all banged up from the iron bowl, they would have won the national championship. Fact


But still lost to UCF in their bowl even though their people had a month's rest to recuperate.
Posted by Tigerman97
Member since Jun 2014
10354 posts
Posted on 7/17/18 at 10:07 am to
While it is probably a bit of reach to say they'll win the National Title...they have a schedule IMO that sets up well to keep all their goals in front of them. People forget these are kids and it isn't easy to keep fighting just for the sake of winning a game when you realize the goals you have aren't reachable anymore.

They have holes to fill as every team does, but they are talented. They have a QB IMO that has proven to be a gamer. I suspect if they don't stumble early they will be a serious contender for the SEC and a playoff birth again. An early stumble or two could derail the season (i.e. 9 wins vs 12 or 13) because playing for pride at the end of the season is easier said than done at this level.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79179 posts
Posted on 7/17/18 at 10:10 am to
quote:

But still lost to UCF in their bowl even though their people had a month's rest to recuperate.



I think reading much into UCF is a mistake, considering we had no interest being there

But the fact is we used up everything we had by the time we got to the SECCG. I think at full strength we were a championship caliber team, but I doubt we would have won the CFP even if we'd gotten past UGA in the rematch.
Posted by Tigerman97
Member since Jun 2014
10354 posts
Posted on 7/17/18 at 10:15 am to
quote:

I think reading much into UCF is a mistake, considering we had no interest being there

But the fact is we used up everything we had by the time we got to the SECCG. I think at full strength we were a championship caliber team, but I doubt we would have won the CFP even if we'd gotten past UGA in the rematch.



I agree. I was at the UCF game. Our crowd and players tried to be into it, but it was obvious every Auburn fan, staffer, player, etc...was disappointed to be playing in that game. You could tell our guys who had a potential NFL futures were going about 75%. I almost wish we'd just use non playoff bowl games as an excuse to get ready for next year and not play anyone leaving for the NFL. A senior playing his last game ever being an obvious exception.

I wasn't someone who assumed we'd beat uga simply because we had earlier in the year. They deserve credit for the adjustments, etc...but the facts remain we were driving to take the lead when we turned it over in the 4th quarter. The final score wasn't indicative of the game as a whole. Which is why many Auburn fans think a healthy team would have won. As I stated you can't say that for certain, but it isn't like uga winning righted some wrong. Both teams were evenly matched when healthy. Another example that we were evenly matched is they played bama well as did we.
This post was edited on 7/17/18 at 10:16 am
Posted by TechDawgs
Dallas via Atlanta
Member since Oct 2014
387 posts
Posted on 7/17/18 at 11:37 am to
quote:

I just think you'll take a step back this year.


Considering we made it to the final 2....k. What a bold prediction.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 7/17/18 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

How did fail to "develop"? He coached/recruited tons of
defensive players that were drafted including multiple
#1's.


You didn't quote that one time McElwain, not even close to being known for his defenses, took that same defense and broke multiple records.

There are tons of players that went into the NFL in spite of Muschamp on offense and defense, not because of Muschamp.

I watched his team give up 429 yards to Georgia Southern on the ground.

I watched Furman (other FCS) run for 234.

The complete breakdown and destruction of his defense by Louisville in 2012.

The 500 yards given up to Alabama.

These were things that just never happened until he came, so when I heard he was a defensive guru I didn't expect to watch FCS teams run all over our 5 star players and watch FBS teams just pick apart his defenses at will. These are just the embarrassing games, I'm not even going back to look at teams like Kentucky who threw for well over 300 yards.

Muschamp was a disaster all around, but at least he could recruit I guess.

The moment Muschamp gets his fat hands out of the cookie jar and stops trying to run the offense, he'll be a FANTASTIC coach. I just need to see that he can actually do it.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter