Started By
Message
re: If your school played LSU in 2003 AND Alabama in 2009
Posted on 3/5/11 at 9:57 am to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 3/5/11 at 9:57 am to Draconian Sanctions
Both Ds we're nasty as hell. They were about even IMO.if either one has an edge it would be LSU, but definitely not by much
1
Posted on 3/5/11 at 9:58 am to memphisplaya
LSU's defense was better imo.
Posted on 3/5/11 at 12:10 pm to RammerJammerBammer
quote:
LSU's defense was more ferocious and were major head hunters. bama defense was just consistent
I could see this, although the Vols didn't play LSU in 2003 so I don't remember them as well.
Posted on 3/5/11 at 12:47 pm to ohiovol
quote:
dirtydirtyAubie
don't ever post again
as for everyone else I hope we "backdoor" our way into another championship this year. I wouldn't mind "backdooring" to a championship every year for that matter. It doesn't matter how you get there you still have to play the game.
Posted on 3/5/11 at 12:56 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
If your school played LSU in 2003 AND Alabama in 2009
Which Defense was better?
Looking strictly at defenses, that's too close for me to call.
Posted on 3/5/11 at 1:13 pm to bamaboy87
quote:
Both Ds we're nasty as hell
Can we all agree that a game between these two teams would end up being one of those weird low scoring affairs? Like 3-0 or 5-3 or something like that, both Ds were just insane
Posted on 3/5/11 at 1:16 pm to Tigerfan7218
quote:
Can we all agree that a game between these two teams would end up being one of those weird low scoring affairs?
2009 Alabama would win because of Leigh Tiffin. Chris Jackson and the other LSU kicker that year were absolutely dreadful.
This post was edited on 3/5/11 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 3/5/11 at 1:16 pm to Draconian Sanctions
bama
Posted on 3/5/11 at 1:19 pm to SLC
Dirty - maybe someone will remember exactly but OU losing had nothing to do w LSU getting in the NC game. I am pretty sure that it was ND losing to Syracuse the last week of the season that got LSU in. FWIW by the end of the season and bowl game I think LSU's D was better than Bama's. Funny that an Ole Miss fan's analysis comes down to the fact that LSU gave up 7 to Ole Miss in 2003 while Bama's gave up 3 to Ole Miss in 2009. Silly logic esp since Eli played for Ole Miss in 2003.
Posted on 3/5/11 at 2:29 pm to trex1230
Probally the 2004 AU def..
Posted on 3/5/11 at 2:32 pm to tigereagle03
Probably not
Posted on 3/5/11 at 6:02 pm to Alahunter
LSU was better against the SEC in 2003 than Bama both over the 8 games or over 9.
They gave up less ppg.
8 games = 78 lsu bama 85
9 game = LSU 91 Bama 98
I don't know where people are digging this shite up
They gave up less ppg.
8 games = 78 lsu bama 85
9 game = LSU 91 Bama 98
I don't know where people are digging this shite up
Posted on 3/5/11 at 6:08 pm to memphisplaya
quote:
Landry and webster disagree
That's two NFL starters and two Pro Bowlers.
There could be an argument against that in a couple of years. Kareem Jackson is already a starter in the NFL. Mark Barron may be a 1st or 2nd rounder next year. Javier Arenas has also made an impact in the NFL and his role will grow.
Posted on 3/5/11 at 6:11 pm to Maximus
quote:
yeah Marquise Hill, Marcus Spears, Kyle Williams and Chad Lavalais was a weak pass rushing d line. They wish they had Cody's fat rolls.
The poster compliments LSU's 2003 defensive line, and that's your reply?
Posted on 3/5/11 at 6:17 pm to Jaketigger
quote:
LSU was better against the SEC in 2003 than Bama both over the 8 games or over 9.
They gave up less ppg.
8 games = 78 lsu bama 85
9 game = LSU 91 Bama 98
I don't know where people are digging this shite up
2003 Lsu SEC Games points surrendered
1. Georgia 10
2. Miss St 6
3. Florida 19
4. S. Car 7
5. Auburn 7
6. Bama 3
7. Ole Miss 14
8. Arky 24
9. Georgia 13
Total 103 pts / 9 games = 11.44 ppg given up
2009 Bama SEC Games points surrendered
1. Arky 7
2. Kentucky 20
3. Ole Miss 3
4. S. Car 6
5. Tennessee 10
6. Lsu 15
7. Miss St 3
8. Auburn 21
9. Florida 13
Total 98 pts / 9 games = 10.88 ppg given up
LINK
Also, on your 8 games regular season
Lsu surrendered 90 to Bama surrendering 85.
This post was edited on 3/5/11 at 6:33 pm
Posted on 3/5/11 at 7:30 pm to Bench McElroy
That was before the SEC championship game win was put into the formula. We didnt BACK our way in. After LSU beat UGA in the SEC championship we jumped USC.
Posted on 3/5/11 at 7:52 pm to Alahunter
Alahunter
Lets not good facts get in way of a good argument, but here is a clear one you're leaving out:
Fact the Qb position as a whole and nearly team by team is much weaker in 2009 vs 2003.
Go check out the QB's.
Lets not good facts get in way of a good argument, but here is a clear one you're leaving out:
Fact the Qb position as a whole and nearly team by team is much weaker in 2009 vs 2003.
Go check out the QB's.
This post was edited on 3/5/11 at 7:55 pm
Posted on 3/5/11 at 7:53 pm to diddydirtyAubie
quote:Dude where is your reasoning coming from this makes no sense. OU was still #1 in the BCS if anything criticize us for getting in over USC but this shite makes no sense.
LSU was on the outside looking in before that loss...everybody knows that.
Posted on 3/5/11 at 7:54 pm to johnnydrama
quote:THIS
What "everyone knew" was that it should have been LSU vs. USC in the title game.
Posted on 3/5/11 at 7:56 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
Bench McElroy
quote:Completely agreed on the evaluation and hypothetical outcome.
LSU's DL >> Alabama's DL
Alabama's LBs >> LSU's LBs
Alabama's DBs = LSU's DBs
Page 3 of 5
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News