Started By
Message
If you had full control of the SEC and could make this decision
Posted on 6/28/26 at 8:55 pm
Posted on 6/28/26 at 8:55 pm
Would you do it?
Go back to this SEC:
with a 9 game schedule where you play every team every year.
Go back to this SEC:
with a 9 game schedule where you play every team every year.
Posted on 6/28/26 at 8:59 pm to anc
I won't stop at just the SEC. My domination will impose a rule that conferences may not be larger than that which would allow each team to play every other team in the conference.
Perhaps, we should regionalize them.
Perhaps, we should regionalize them.
Posted on 6/28/26 at 9:01 pm to New Money
quote:
I won't stop at just the SEC. My domination will impose a rule that conferences may not be larger than that which would allow each team to play every other team in the conference.
Perhaps, we should regionalize them.
Perhaps we could make eight of them, 10 teams each. And the eight champions of these conferences made a playoff that was played over two Saturdays in December and a championship game in the Rose Bowl on New Year's Day.
This post was edited on 6/28/26 at 9:03 pm
Posted on 6/28/26 at 9:37 pm to New Money
quote:
I won't stop at just the SEC. My domination will impose a rule that conferences may not be larger than that which would allow each team to play every other team in the conference.
Perhaps, we should regionalize them.
That's what you had in the old SWC, Big 8, ACC and Pac 8. Even when there was just a 10 game schedule everybody played everybody.
Posted on 6/28/26 at 9:41 pm to anc
I’d make lane Kiffin lick his own balls like to dog he is.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:09 am to anc
More likely we end up at 10 and that's one of the divisions
Posted on 6/29/26 at 6:54 am to anc
No. Because you’re making the SEC 10 teams big. Which means MORE smaller-sized conferences. All adding up to the difficulty of determining a true NC.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 6:57 am to anc
While I agree with only the champions playing, I disagree with the RB location…rotate it around the country.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:29 am to Fan1958
quote:
That's what you had in the old SWC, Big 8, ACC and Pac 8. Even when there was just a 10 game schedule everybody played everybody.
…and it was glorious.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 11:05 am to New Money
Cotton
SWC vs B8
Sugar
SEC vs WC
Orange
ACC vs Big East
Rose
P10 vs B10
Those 4 winners have a playoff. Keeps tradition and it makes all of those games important.
Oh what coulda been..
SWC vs B8
Sugar
SEC vs WC
Orange
ACC vs Big East
Rose
P10 vs B10
Those 4 winners have a playoff. Keeps tradition and it makes all of those games important.
Oh what coulda been..
Posted on 6/29/26 at 6:31 pm to anc
I'm still confused they put UGA as a brown bulldog instead of solid white.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 6:58 pm to anc
It is all about money now. Texas, OU, Mizzou all give very big markets. Especially Texas.
Texas Pop- 31.3 Mill....it is very, very high.
So no chance in hell.
In ten years I bet the SEC and the Big Ten are the only two major conferences. SEC will prob add Duke, UNC, Clemson, Miami, FSU, Louisville, Memphis, Texas Tech, and Georgia Tech.
It will suck like hell but it is all about TV marketplaces now. I pray it does not happen, but it prob will.
Texas Pop- 31.3 Mill....it is very, very high.
So no chance in hell.
In ten years I bet the SEC and the Big Ten are the only two major conferences. SEC will prob add Duke, UNC, Clemson, Miami, FSU, Louisville, Memphis, Texas Tech, and Georgia Tech.
It will suck like hell but it is all about TV marketplaces now. I pray it does not happen, but it prob will.
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 7:04 pm
Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:04 pm to Gatorbait2008
Yes. And the conference offices will eventually move.
Rodo
Rodo
Posted on 6/29/26 at 7:06 pm to Rodo
Where do you think they move it? Also will the conference title game move from ATL you think?
Popular
Back to top
7









