Started By
Message

re: How Would You Rank SEC Programs Historically?

Posted on 1/20/14 at 6:43 pm to
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 6:43 pm to
I really don't see how you can put Georgia lower than #3.
Posted by Sampson
Drusilla and Jefferson
Member since Mar 2012
24962 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

The point of this thread is a program's history, which includes the years before UF became relevant in the 80's, sorry.


Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
58785 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 7:06 pm to
quote:

The point of this thread is a program's history, which includes the years before UF became relevant in the 80's, sorry.


Which is why you would have to assign some sort of system to weigh the eras of college football

Age 1 = start through WW II
Age 2 = 50's - 70's as the rise of the state schools
Age 3 = 70's - 00's as the rise of ESPN
Age 4 = 10's - ?? as the emergence of the Big 4 / Big 5
Posted by DocHog
Member since Nov 2006
1915 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 7:25 pm to
TAMU/Arkansas is a wash. We hold the head to head, therefore, we rank higher.
Posted by MrAUTigers
Florida
Member since Sep 2013
29082 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

It took decades to get over the hump and get an official championship, but doormat is a little extreme. After all UF has a higher winning percentage all time than Auburn, we had to pick up some wins pre-1990 right?



You do realize that before 1991 you had zero conference championships, right?

Auburn all time record 733-416-47 .633
Florida all time record 684-388-40 .633

all time head-to-head Auburn leads 43-38-2
This post was edited on 1/20/14 at 7:34 pm
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
107178 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 7:33 pm to
quote:

After all UF has a higher winning percentage all time than Auburn


Let me know when .633 is a higher percentage than .633. Thanks
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 7:35 pm to
Auburn using all-time record.

Bama
Tennessee
Georgia
LSU/Auburn/Florida


Doesn't matter
This post was edited on 1/20/14 at 7:37 pm
Posted by MrAUTigers
Florida
Member since Sep 2013
29082 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

A&M and Mizzou have to be the last two, just because their "SEC history" is two years old.


sounds intelligent


So you think that A&M and Mizzou, with all of your two years of SEC experience, should be ranked ahead of other teams in "SEC program history"? That sounds pretty ignorant, IMO.

Posted by DocHog
Member since Nov 2006
1915 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 7:42 pm to
Go to CFB data wear house

Pick an era. I picked the past 50 years since I am I about that age. One could go back 75 or 100 years too

In the 50 yr and 75 yr range, we are ranked ahead of TAMU.

It is only when you go back 100 years that they pass us

I can see how some might rank them higher than us, but I can't, especially given the huge advantage in Head to head that we have over them.
Posted by dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Dystopia (but well cared for)
Member since Mar 2012
25235 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 7:43 pm to
quote:

How Would You Rank SEC Programs Historically?


This seems fair enough...




When I was growing up it was UA then UT then everyone else. Now, I don't know that there's much difference between 2-6.


fwiw and jmo

Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 7:46 pm to
psst. The B1G suckkkkkks.
Posted by BasilBogomil
Member since Dec 2012
6146 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 7:47 pm to
quote:


LSU would be #1 or #2 overall if Miles was somewhat competent



Miles is 5-4 versus Florida, what does that say about your coaches


Posted by dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Dystopia (but well cared for)
Member since Mar 2012
25235 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 7:47 pm to
oops...

Well, like someone said, does leather helmets and covered wagons really matter? At what point is it just a stat discussion?
Posted by NorthEndZone
Member since Dec 2008
13011 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 8:01 pm to
Just like below. Grouped teams are very close.

I-A Winning Percentage 1869-2013 (145 years)

Rank Team name Win-Pct Won Lost Tied Games
---- ----------------------- ------- ---- ---- ---- -----
6 Alabama 0.71387 838 323 43 1204

9 Tennessee 0.68186 804 361 53 1218

12 Louisiana State 0.64925 753 396 47 1196
13 Georgia 0.64658 767 407 54 1228

15 Auburn 0.63036 726 416 47 1189
16 Florida 0.62913 684 395 40 1119

21 Texas A&M 0.60166 701 456 48 1205
28 Arkansas 0.58988 686 471 39 1196

48 Mississippi 0.55950 636 497 35 1168
54 Missouri 0.54642 645 531 52 1228

68 South Carolina 0.51460 577 543 44 1164

76 Vanderbilt 0.50000 582 582 50 1214
80 Kentucky 0.49589 582 592 44 1218
87 Mississippi State 0.48475 521 555 39 1115
This post was edited on 1/20/14 at 8:03 pm
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
58785 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

Well, like someone said, does leather helmets and covered wagons really matter?


Look at Michigan before the 50's = 10 MNC's
Since then they only have the 1 in 1997


Gators won all 3 of theirs in the post CFA era
Posted by pivey14
In Your Head
Member since Mar 2012
15445 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 8:11 pm to
quote:

12. Kentucky
13. Mississippi State




Posted by KCM0Tiger
Kansas City, MISSOURI
Member since Nov 2011
16288 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 8:19 pm to
1. Bama
2. Tennessee
3. LSU
4. Auburn
5. Florida
6. Georgia

7. Texas A&M
8. Arkansas
9. Missouri
10. Ole Miss
11. Vanderbilt
12. South Carolina
13. Kentucky
14. Mississippi State

Before you bitch about Vanderbilt being too high, remember this thread is about HISTORICAL rankings. Vandy has 14 conference titles, which is 9 titles more than 12,13, and 14 combined.
This post was edited on 1/20/14 at 8:20 pm
Posted by tigerinridgeland
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2006
7660 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

You almost had me til # 2 on the list. Historically? WTF has LSU done in SEC folklore?


As I stated, rankings are determined by the factors and weight. Who comes out 2d to 5 depends the methodology. College Football Data Warehouse's methodology ranks LSU 2d. Sorry of that hurt your feelings. I assume their ranks are unbiased, but you may certainly disagree with their methodology.

BTW, LSU has won an SEC championship in every decade of the conference's history, except two, the 1940s and the 1990s, so there is plenty of history there. And we a talking historically. Unfortunately for Ole Miss, the conference history is more than the 1960s. GT bailed in the 60s and the conference has been around for almost another 50 years, longer than GT was in the conference. You can't ignore those 50 years in ranking teams historically.

I think three teams have legitimate argument for no.2, Tennessee, UGA, and LSU based on the entire conference history. Since Florida didn't really become a power until the 1990s other than one tainted championship, I would place them at no.4, but of course that is somewhat subjective too.
This post was edited on 1/20/14 at 8:40 pm
Posted by LSUbase13
Mt. Pleasant, SC
Member since Mar 2008
15060 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 8:41 pm to
1. Alabama
2. Tennessee
3. LSU
4. Auburn
5. Florida
6. Georgia
7. Texas A&M
8. Ole Miss
9. Arkansas
10. Missouri
11. South Carolina
12. Mississippi State
13. Kentucky
14. Vanderbilt
Posted by bgator85
Sarasota
Member since Aug 2007
6096 posts
Posted on 1/20/14 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

Let me know when .633 is a higher percentage than .633


You only get to the .633 when you include ties. If you calculate winning percentage without, UF is slightly higher.
This post was edited on 1/20/14 at 8:58 pm
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter