Started By
Message
re: How about a 16- or 24-team playoff?
Posted on 1/12/26 at 9:36 am to Trumansfangs
Posted on 1/12/26 at 9:36 am to Trumansfangs
quote:
Or ..or ..or how about a 48 or 96 team playoff ?
Y'all would still never make the playoff
Posted on 1/12/26 at 9:44 am to BigHorn69
For all the people that want it back to 4 teams, you want to cut it off at Indiana, Ohio State, Georgia and Texas Tech?
Cutting out all these teams with one loss. Oregon, Ole Miss and A&M?
Oregon with one loss to Indiana and they are out?
Ole Miss with one loss to Georgia and they are out?
A&M with one loss to Texas and they are out?
That is ridiculous. We should just go back to the way it is before and have the polls pick the national champions before the bowl games and let everyone who might go pro just opt out. Either the post season matters for everyone or it doesn't. I don't want some of the bowl to matter and not others. Every bowl game should be a playoff game.
At the end of a football season, players don't want to play anymore for fun because they are tired and want rest, hence no one wants to play in the pro bowl.
Cutting out all these teams with one loss. Oregon, Ole Miss and A&M?
Oregon with one loss to Indiana and they are out?
Ole Miss with one loss to Georgia and they are out?
A&M with one loss to Texas and they are out?
That is ridiculous. We should just go back to the way it is before and have the polls pick the national champions before the bowl games and let everyone who might go pro just opt out. Either the post season matters for everyone or it doesn't. I don't want some of the bowl to matter and not others. Every bowl game should be a playoff game.
At the end of a football season, players don't want to play anymore for fun because they are tired and want rest, hence no one wants to play in the pro bowl.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 9:45 am to GAT BoilerPickle Doc
quote:
Y'all would still never make the playoff
Lol you saw where I was going with this didn't you ?
Posted on 1/12/26 at 9:45 am to SECdragonmaster
quote:
The more teams that have an opportunity to play for a championship makes the championship more deserved.
So why not have a 128 team playoff?
Posted on 1/12/26 at 9:50 am to Toroballistic
8 is the right number. The CFP knows this. The SEC knows this. The BIG knows this.
It would work too perfectly though and fans wouldn’t ever want to expand beyond that.
But nope. We’ve got to have 3 and 4 loss teams in the playoff.
It would work too perfectly though and fans wouldn’t ever want to expand beyond that.
But nope. We’ve got to have 3 and 4 loss teams in the playoff.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 10:05 am to InkStainedWretch
How about a FOUR team playoff? You know, the kind of playoff that makes sense and ensures the season actually means something.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 10:05 am to Swamp Angel
quote:
How about a FOUR team playoff? You know, the kind of playoff that makes sense and ensures the season actually means something.
You want a system that would have kept out Miami which is in the championship this year ?
Do results on the field matter or not ?
Posted on 1/12/26 at 10:08 am to bluestem75
quote:
8 is the right number. The CFP knows this. The SEC knows this. The BIG knows this.
How is 8 the right number when two times out of two times a team ranked higher than 8th has made the championship game? That blows the stupid arse theory of only the top 4 or even 8 teams have a shot at winning.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 10:39 am to bigDgator
8 could be conf. champs & runner up only.
This post was edited on 1/12/26 at 10:40 am
Posted on 1/12/26 at 11:00 am to BigHorn69
quote:
You want a system that would have kept out Miami which is in the championship this year ?
Yup.
quote:
Do results on the field matter or not ?
You should ask Miami since they already have two losses to Louisville and to SMU.
If we're going to expand the playoffs even further than they already are, then why not go ahead and expand it to 128 teams? Play a six game season and then begin the playoffs. It'd only take seven wins in a 128 team field to crown the champion.
Seriously. Getting to the college championship game is starting to feel like an NHL season that seemingly never ends.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 11:05 am to Rip N Lip
I think 8 would be perfect!
Posted on 1/12/26 at 3:58 pm to Toroballistic
quote:
So why not have a 128 team playoff?
Even better.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 4:03 pm to InkStainedWretch
16 is going to happen. They won’t reduce the number because that would mean a loss of revenue. 16 just makes more sense than 12. It won’t lengthen the season any and it will now allow the 1-4 teams to host a playoff game on campus rather than get a bye, which most schools might prefer considering how poorly 1-4 teams have done with the bye these first two years. Will be shocked if we’re not at 16 teams in a year or two.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 4:08 pm to bigDgator
quote:
How is 8 the right number when two times out of two times a team ranked higher than 8th
You should say “ranked 8th or higher,” not “ranked higher than 8th” to make it accurate. But your point is certainly valid.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 4:13 pm to InkStainedWretch
If its 16 thats it the max. No more this is already pushing it. 24 is just beyond stupid
Posted on 1/12/26 at 4:40 pm to BhamTigah
quote:
Not necessarily. You are just more likely to find the team that gets hot at the right time. Doesn’t mean they were best or most deserving.
So you mean like NCAA baseball or basketball…
Posted on 1/12/26 at 4:42 pm to InkStainedWretch
bullshite…it should drop to no more than eight
Posted on 1/12/26 at 5:10 pm to InkStainedWretch
Posted on 1/12/26 at 5:20 pm to InkStainedWretch
32 and year around.
Signed
Corporate USA
Signed
Corporate USA
Back to top


1








