Started By
Message
re: Hey Auburn.. about having Evan's bio up on your 2014 Signing class site
Posted on 2/5/14 at 12:46 pm to antibarner
Posted on 2/5/14 at 12:46 pm to antibarner
Just so NYC understands.the IB play was offensive pass interference,Jay Prosch was illegally blocking CJ Mosley 5 yards downfield when the ball was thrown. Call it an illegal pick play or outright interference.
Marshall was NOT over the LOS and the AU OL was borderline but not past 3 yards downfield.
I know the rules. YOU should read them son.
Marshall was NOT over the LOS and the AU OL was borderline but not past 3 yards downfield.
I know the rules. YOU should read them son.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 12:47 pm to antibarner
quote:
I know the rules

its become quite obvious you dont
Posted on 2/5/14 at 12:47 pm to antibarner
You must be PeeJ's twin brother.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 12:49 pm to antibarner
Secondary violations are so minor that it's not worth turning someone in over them.
The fact that the bio was already created does not necessarily mean it's not a violation. (It may be or may not be - I am no expert in NCAA compliance). Just pointing out that it many cases it is the responsibility of the institution to ensure that information is not made public. In my job, we have to go to great lengths to ensure that offlabel pharmaceutical information is only provided in response to a specific question and to certain health care professionals. If someone can manipulate the url to see something they weren't intended to see, it is still a compliance violation...it is our burden to ensure that doesn't happen.
The fact that the bio was already created does not necessarily mean it's not a violation. (It may be or may not be - I am no expert in NCAA compliance). Just pointing out that it many cases it is the responsibility of the institution to ensure that information is not made public. In my job, we have to go to great lengths to ensure that offlabel pharmaceutical information is only provided in response to a specific question and to certain health care professionals. If someone can manipulate the url to see something they weren't intended to see, it is still a compliance violation...it is our burden to ensure that doesn't happen.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 12:50 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
maybe its projection,
So you commit an ad hominem or two, link my sarcastic response, and somehow try to turn that into projection?

You are drowning in cammy cam juice at this point. Just back away from the keyboard.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 12:51 pm to Wallacewade04
This picture is making me laugh!
Posted on 2/5/14 at 12:51 pm to Zchlsu
NYC ..go to the NCAA rules read them then come back and apologize.
So I can then tell you to shove it.
Bottom line..you don't know what you are talking about. I would say the people I cited know more about football than you do and they agree with me.
No need to beat this horse anyway just to let you change the subject.
Auburn has committed secondary violations in Rashaan Evans recruitment. Not a real big deal.
The BIG deal is...WE GOT HIM....and you don't.
Now smartass your way out of that one.
So I can then tell you to shove it.

Bottom line..you don't know what you are talking about. I would say the people I cited know more about football than you do and they agree with me.
No need to beat this horse anyway just to let you change the subject.
Auburn has committed secondary violations in Rashaan Evans recruitment. Not a real big deal.
The BIG deal is...WE GOT HIM....and you don't.
Now smartass your way out of that one.
This post was edited on 2/5/14 at 12:53 pm
Posted on 2/5/14 at 12:52 pm to MagicCityBlazer
quote:
somehow try to turn that into projection?
When you bring up something that was not even talked about, yes its projection
quote:
You are drowning in cammy cam juice at this point. Just back away from the keyboard.
I guess you dont see it for yourself
Posted on 2/5/14 at 12:53 pm to bbap
Interesting to see the juxtaposition of Alabama fan reaction about this potential minor violation to what the Auburn fanbase's position would be if it happened at Alabama. Alabama fan's saying no big deal at all while Auburn fans would be whining about how the NCAA should shut down the Alabama program but won't because they are in our back pocket. 

Posted on 2/5/14 at 12:54 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
When you bring up something that was not even talked about, yes its projection
Look, you're the one who brought up redneck or crazy fans.
Stop trying to gaslight.
quote:
I guess you dont see it for yourself
Just stop bro, you are being trolled by antibarner on some inconsequential play from last year.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 12:54 pm to antibarner
quote:
NYC ..go to the NCAA rules read them then come back and apologize
again, you might want to know all of the rules
quote:
.you don't know what you are talking about. I would say the people I cited know more about football than you do and they agree with me.

quote:
Auburn has committed secondary violations in Rashaan Evans recruitment.
its like a broken record at this point. I know you are trolling but your grasp of "rules" is downright hilarious.
quote:
Now smartass your way out of that one.
All I need to do is copy and paste your post. it shows enough
Posted on 2/5/14 at 12:55 pm to MagicCityBlazer
quote:
Look, you're the one who brought up redneck or crazy fans.
I did?
quote:
Just stop bro, you are being trolled by antibarner on some inconsequential play from last year.
you still dont see it

ETA. Well its lunch time folks. I expect antibarner to be downloading NCAA rule books as we speak

This post was edited on 2/5/14 at 12:57 pm
Posted on 2/5/14 at 12:56 pm to NYCAuburn
This Barner is typical. That is all that needs to be said.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 12:56 pm to Govt Tide
quote:
Interesting to see the juxtaposition of Alabama fan reaction about this potential minor violation to what the Auburn fanbase's position would be if it happened at Alabama. Alabama fan's saying no big deal at all while Auburn fans would be whining about how the NCAA should shut down the Alabama program but won't because they are in our back pocket.
I think Barn fans have suffered enough today. Punishment has far exceeded the crime IMO.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 12:56 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
you still dont see it
You are such a troll

I failed at detecting the meta-troll involved here.
This post was edited on 2/5/14 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 2/5/14 at 12:57 pm to antibarner
quote:
Just so NYC understands.the IB play was offensive pass interference,Jay Prosch was illegally blocking CJ Mosley 5 yards downfield when the ball was thrown. Call it an illegal pick play or outright interference.
Marshall was NOT over the LOS and the AU OL was borderline but not past 3 yards downfield.
I know the rules. YOU should read them son.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 12:58 pm to NYCAuburn
Ladies, ladies ...
Three pages of bitches throwing tantrums over who is right about what is a freaking secondary violation.
Take off the skirts, unhook your bras, and pull your panties out of your arse. Football season is over - rest up and enjoy your day.
Three pages of bitches throwing tantrums over who is right about what is a freaking secondary violation.
Take off the skirts, unhook your bras, and pull your panties out of your arse. Football season is over - rest up and enjoy your day.
Posted on 2/5/14 at 1:00 pm to Crimson Legend
It seems like a pretty damn stupid violation to begin with (regardless of school involved).
It makes sense to have a page pre-built in anticipation. It's not as if Auburn went out and posted it for all to see and paraded it. As you said, someone manipulated the URL to see something built as an "incase it happens, we've got it ready!"
Agreed though, they should've had the scripts saved and not a full webpage with dedicated url. Could've just injected the scripts to a new page and published it upon a recruit's signing.
It makes sense to have a page pre-built in anticipation. It's not as if Auburn went out and posted it for all to see and paraded it. As you said, someone manipulated the URL to see something built as an "incase it happens, we've got it ready!"
Agreed though, they should've had the scripts saved and not a full webpage with dedicated url. Could've just injected the scripts to a new page and published it upon a recruit's signing.
Popular
Back to top
