Started By
Message
Has the NCAA granted Trinidad Chambliss his waiver request or will he be playing against
Posted on 8/31/26 at 5:38 pm
Posted on 8/31/26 at 5:38 pm
their rule (which they haven't changed)?
Just wondering
Just wondering
Posted on 8/31/26 at 5:47 pm to tigerskin
Let's say LSU gets punished by the SEC.
It will interesting to see what happens when they sue the conference for punishing LSU for playing ineligible players, but allowing Pavia, Chambliss, and rest, to compete in direct violation of Article 14.01.01.
Maybe that's the ultimate goal. Maybe not.
It will interesting to see what happens when they sue the conference for punishing LSU for playing ineligible players, but allowing Pavia, Chambliss, and rest, to compete in direct violation of Article 14.01.01.
Maybe that's the ultimate goal. Maybe not.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 5:49 pm to tigerskin
thats different, because reasons
Posted on 8/31/26 at 5:49 pm to tigerskin
He shouldn’t be allowed to play and neither should have Pavia. It isn’t right but that doesn’t excuse LSU’s actions either
Posted on 8/31/26 at 5:52 pm to Rip Torner
quote:
He shouldn’t be allowed to play and neither should have Pavia. It isn’t right but that doesn’t excuse LSU’s actions either
Consistency matters. If you want to punish programs for players you deem ineligible, do it across the board or not at all
Posted on 8/31/26 at 5:55 pm to tigerskin
Agreed, Ole Miss, LSU, and any other SEC school who plays ineligible players saved by TRO’s should be hit with penalties
Posted on 8/31/26 at 5:57 pm to Rip Torner
And if the NCAA/SEC was consistent like that, LSU would not allow the players tomorrow
Posted on 8/31/26 at 6:40 pm to Rip Torner
quote:
and any other SEC school who plays ineligible players saved by TRO’s should be hit with penalties
Yea but these other schools haven’t been hit with penalties and have gained a competitive advantage because of it. Any other school would be fools not to seek the same competitive advantage since up to this point there has been zero consequences for it. This problem did not start with LSU.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 6:47 pm to tigerskin
The SEC isn't going to make a ruling based on the NCAA's inconsistent medical waiver process.
This post was edited on 8/31/26 at 6:48 pm
Posted on 8/31/26 at 6:51 pm to Quicksilver
quote:
The SEC isn't going to make a ruling based on an inconsistent medical waiver process by the NCAA.
What about inconsistent anything? There are guys that are in their 6th and 7th year in the NCAA. They draw the line on TRO’s from guys younger than those players.
This is still very much on the SEC.
Posted on 8/31/26 at 7:00 pm to tigerskin
Did the SEC have a meeting to specifically make rules against him playing?
Posted on 8/31/26 at 7:04 pm to ManBearSharkReb
quote:
Did the SEC have a meeting to specifically make rules against him playing?
If they were consistent they would
Glad I could clear that up for you
Posted on 8/31/26 at 7:06 pm to tigerskin
Why are you retards doing this?
Can I get a true cost benefit analysis from any lsu fans?
Can I get a true cost benefit analysis from any lsu fans?
Posted on 8/31/26 at 7:08 pm to ManBearSharkReb
quote:
ManBearSharkReb
Remember when you said there was absolutely no way Kiffin was leaving for LSU? I do and I also remember the melt that followed.
It’s going to be SO much worse when these dudes are allowed to play.
This post was edited on 8/31/26 at 7:09 pm
Back to top
5







