Started By
Message
re: Guess: How many for and against? 6-8
Posted on 7/21/21 at 11:16 pm to BigBro
Posted on 7/21/21 at 11:16 pm to BigBro
quote:
quote: You are full of shite. More like $5MM/year less. Doesn't matter. You not getting in. Too many alliances to prevent adding 2nd in state teams have been formed. You are completely delusional if you think that this deal won’t make every team more money.. about $10 million more by my calculations.. I can show my work if you like.
Texas is the potential partner in the firm that generates big sales numbers, but also might get you sued because they lie to their clients to do so. Is the upside worth the organizational cancer you’re taking on?
This post was edited on 7/21/21 at 11:19 pm
0
Posted on 7/21/21 at 11:33 pm to CREAg
quote:
The consensus is that we’re moving towards four 16 team conferences. I think the schools you’re referring to (especially UF, USC, UGA) might bet that they can screw us on this one, increase the conference revenue per school, and lock out their in state rivals permanently.
LOL @ GT getting invited back to the conference...
Posted on 7/22/21 at 12:00 am to Jacknola
quote:
day… Lookie here dumazz, Ags may be weird and different, but now they are OUR SEC weird-different
Speak for yourself bammer. Those guys can diddle off
Posted on 7/22/21 at 12:06 am to CREAg
quote:
Because the university of Texas is a bad business partner.
This x3,000,000
Posted on 7/22/21 at 12:06 am to FishFearMe
quote:
It has been very refreshing to be around SEC fans and away from you arrogant a holes.
Can’t say the same. Go away.
Posted on 7/22/21 at 12:20 am to fibonaccisquared
quote:Hah yea, we’ll there’s a reason why UGA was listed last of the three… LSU and Arkansas aren’t worried about in state competition. UK probably should be on the list, but does anyone care about UK in the bigger picture anyway?
LOL @ GT getting invited back to the conference...
Posted on 7/22/21 at 12:37 am to 14&Counting
It will be a 14-0 vote in principle, but officially a 13-1 vote. Aggie will be permitted to vote No just to save the necks of their leaders.
This is a done deal folks. They are following the same play book as last time when TAMU and Missouri withdrew from their old conference and petitioned for SEC membership.
This doesn’t get to this point without private assurances it will be approved.
I don’t like what it means for college football, but welcome aboard t-sips & land thieves.
This is a done deal folks. They are following the same play book as last time when TAMU and Missouri withdrew from their old conference and petitioned for SEC membership.
This doesn’t get to this point without private assurances it will be approved.
I don’t like what it means for college football, but welcome aboard t-sips & land thieves.
Posted on 7/22/21 at 2:13 am to LSUGrrrl
quote:
Texas is a hard pass no matter what. I’d take almost any of the teams in the East that would make sense regionally. OK doesn’t make sense without Texas but I’d take them with only a little grumbling if Texas wasn’t part of the package.
I’m not scared of Texas. I hate their arrogant fan base, the strong arming tactics they used to control the *big 12, their game day atmosphere and self entitlement.
This.
Plus I hate Matthew McConauGHEY.
Posted on 7/22/21 at 6:40 am to CREAg
quote:
UK probably should be on the list, but does anyone care about UK in the bigger picture anyway?
Go eat a bag of dicks. Last time we played, it took OT for you to beat us.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News