Started By
Message
re: Georgia got hosed big time and it’s funny.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:24 pm to koreandawg
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:24 pm to koreandawg
Georgia’s rush defense has too up this year. You guys were only allowing like 3 yards a carry or something extremely low.
0
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:26 pm to JayAg
I used to think it was a message board act with you and some of your Trolling Aggie posters, but with you, it's no act. You really are a miserable piece of shite...congrats
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:27 pm to JayAg
quote:
but Georgia is the only team would have rolled tu, Bama, Washington, and Michigan imo.
But Georgie decided to not implement the same defensive game plan Auburn, Texas, and Michigan did against Bama — which was blitz Milroe all night bc he can’t read a defense under pressure. And they lost the game due to this.
So who cares.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:27 pm to Sleepy_Tiger
Calm down, don’t go crazy now.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:28 pm to JayAg
quote:
3rd lose
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:29 pm to JayAg
Georgia could not take care of business with a Bama team that literally relied on luck, ann injury to Jordan Travis, and a championship 6 years ago to make their case for the playoffs.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:30 pm to Partha
If we had beaten Bama we would've been playing FSU in the semi.
So it's really do you think we could've beaten Michigan, assuming Michigan beats Washington in the Rose Bowl.
I'm not saying we could roll them, but we would've caused them problems. The false narrative that they would've run on us like crazy is out there. No one with a conventional run game like they have has really done that well vs. us. Mizzou was pretty good. But no one has just blown us off the ball like some are saying.
When you lose a game everyone thought you would win, false narratives are created. Greg M for instance says Georgia got dominated by Bama's OL. That's true for a couple of drives. But Bama averaged less than three yards a rush and we didn't have nearly as many negative plays on sacks, bad snaps as Michigan got. Bama had four drives from the start of the second half to well into the fourth that went for a total of less than 50 yards. We lost because we blew coverage a couple of times and Bama didn't. We also fumbled the ball and gave them three points and missed a makable FG. We had way more mistakes than they did and it's hard to win games against that kind of talent if you are making mistakes and they are not.
So it's really do you think we could've beaten Michigan, assuming Michigan beats Washington in the Rose Bowl.
I'm not saying we could roll them, but we would've caused them problems. The false narrative that they would've run on us like crazy is out there. No one with a conventional run game like they have has really done that well vs. us. Mizzou was pretty good. But no one has just blown us off the ball like some are saying.
When you lose a game everyone thought you would win, false narratives are created. Greg M for instance says Georgia got dominated by Bama's OL. That's true for a couple of drives. But Bama averaged less than three yards a rush and we didn't have nearly as many negative plays on sacks, bad snaps as Michigan got. Bama had four drives from the start of the second half to well into the fourth that went for a total of less than 50 yards. We lost because we blew coverage a couple of times and Bama didn't. We also fumbled the ball and gave them three points and missed a makable FG. We had way more mistakes than they did and it's hard to win games against that kind of talent if you are making mistakes and they are not.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:32 pm to Arkapigdiesel
quote:
i know it was only our 2nd lose in 3 years
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:33 pm to koreandawg
quote:
So it's really do you think we could've beaten Michigan, assuming Michigan beats Washington in the Rose Bowl.
I'm not saying we could roll them, but we would've caused them problems. The false narrative that they would've run on us like crazy is out there. No one with a conventional run game like they have has really done that well vs. us. Mizzou was pretty good. But no one has just blown us off the ball like some are saying.
I agree. I think Georgia could've defintely beaten Michigan. It would've been a tough game. I think Michigan's experience would've given them the edge. I also don't know how Beck would've done against Michigan's defense. He did not have a great game against Bama and was fortunate that Bama's DBs dropped a few potential picks. The kid definitely has talent but he needs the experience in big game situations against talented and experienced teams.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:33 pm to koreandawg
That’s what I’m saying. We had the number one DL in terms of sacks and TFL. But we were no where close to the run stuffers you guys were. As good as our DL was doing, I was like, “how tf is Georgia doing better.”
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:35 pm to JayAg
To hell with UGA, Kirby can't beat Saban... 
THE END.
Wash had no hope of winning it all. Only Texas, Mich. or Bama could win two games in these playoffs. Wash. matched up with Texas and their 95 pass defense well, but if Texas gets by Wash. Mich. Pass Game is nit all thats. MATCH-UPS matter.
THE END. Wash had no hope of winning it all. Only Texas, Mich. or Bama could win two games in these playoffs. Wash. matched up with Texas and their 95 pass defense well, but if Texas gets by Wash. Mich. Pass Game is nit all thats. MATCH-UPS matter.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:37 pm to TTOWN RONMON
quote:
their 95 pass defense well
Washingtons pass defense was ranked like 105th. The only team that plays defense won.
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:38 pm to JayAg
Georgia got beat up front by Bama. Could not get pressure on D and coould not stop the run. Also struggled to establish LOS on offense. Would have gotten manhandled up front by Michigan.
This post was edited on 1/8/24 at 10:41 pm
Posted on 1/8/24 at 10:42 pm to JayAg
quote:Hmmm if only Texas had 11 other wins and a conference title to stand on…
Yeah, but anytime someone tells you anything, you pull the, “but we beat bama”. That quick sand you’re standing on
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News