Started By
Message
For those getting excited about A&M's defense
Posted on 11/12/25 at 9:53 am
Posted on 11/12/25 at 9:53 am
If it is just because of last Saturday. Don't.
MU's Off Coordinator took a high school game plan, removed all the quick easy passes that would have taken some of the pressure off his "playing for the first time" freshman QB, and ran with that plan all game long.
It did not work all game long, but he did not let that stop him.
So give A&M coaches whatever credit you want to give them for simply letting the other team beat itself and not getting in the way.
MU's Off Coordinator took a high school game plan, removed all the quick easy passes that would have taken some of the pressure off his "playing for the first time" freshman QB, and ran with that plan all game long.
It did not work all game long, but he did not let that stop him.
So give A&M coaches whatever credit you want to give them for simply letting the other team beat itself and not getting in the way.
12
Posted on 11/12/25 at 9:55 am to Tiger97
I don’t even think most A&M fans are excited about their defense
Posted on 11/12/25 at 9:55 am to Tiger97
No one is getting excited about our defense.
I’m very excited about our offense. It is close to being elite.
Our defense, on the other hand, has some giant question marks.
I’m very excited about our offense. It is close to being elite.
Our defense, on the other hand, has some giant question marks.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 9:55 am to Tiger97
It has been weird to see so many Mizzou threads trying to minimize A&M and excuse their own team the week AFTER the game.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 9:55 am to Tiger97
Posted on 11/12/25 at 9:57 am to Old Sarge
quote:
It’s ranked high for a reason
Auburn
Miss State
Florida
Arkansas
LSU
Missouri
Posted on 11/12/25 at 9:58 am to Old Sarge
This highlights that A&M is a complete team. Our offense gets us leads, and if that lead is in danger, our defense throws the opposing team backwards.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 10:01 am to Tiger97
I know they kicked our Oline's arse
Posted on 11/12/25 at 10:03 am to Tiger97
Exactly. A&M is only feasting on terrible competition. Nothing to see here.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 10:05 am to Tiger97
Elko should have punched it in on the last drive instead of hitting the mercy knee for you clowns.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 10:06 am to Tiger97
I think it is more necause of THIS! :
#1 Total Defense 300 YPG
#1 Sacks 25 sacks (4.17 per game)
#2 Tackles for Loss 47 (7.83 per game)
#1 Opponents 3rd Down Conversions 19.12%
#1 Opponents 4th Down Conversions 25%
#2 Scoring Defense 20.0 points per game
#1 Passing Defense 177.7 YPG
#1 Passing Percentage Allowed 57.6%
#1 Passing Yards per Attempt 5.8 Yards per Attempt
#5 Rushing Defense 123 YPG
#4 Rushing TDs allowed 6 total
#1 Total Defense 300 YPG
#1 Sacks 25 sacks (4.17 per game)
#2 Tackles for Loss 47 (7.83 per game)
#1 Opponents 3rd Down Conversions 19.12%
#1 Opponents 4th Down Conversions 25%
#2 Scoring Defense 20.0 points per game
#1 Passing Defense 177.7 YPG
#1 Passing Percentage Allowed 57.6%
#1 Passing Yards per Attempt 5.8 Yards per Attempt
#5 Rushing Defense 123 YPG
#4 Rushing TDs allowed 6 total
Posted on 11/12/25 at 10:07 am to Nasty_Canasta
quote:
I don’t even think most A&M fans are excited about their defense
You will be after this Saturday...
Posted on 11/12/25 at 10:08 am to truth22
quote:
#5 Rushing Defense 123 YPG
This is misleading because it includes lost yardage from sacks.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 10:11 am to Tiger97
We are #1 or #2 in almost every defensive stat when looking at SEC only stats but most A&M fans think our defense sucks and is a weakness. Not much excitement considering the results.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 10:12 am to tBrand
Negative plays affect team stats
Shouldn’t they? It seems to make sense to me that they should
Shouldn’t they? It seems to make sense to me that they should
Posted on 11/12/25 at 10:15 am to Old Sarge
But why would any team attempt a pass vs A&M if they don’t need to?
Posted on 11/12/25 at 10:15 am to Old Sarge
quote:
It seems to make sense to me that they should
It makes sense to you that sacks on pass plays would inflate a rushing defense ranking? Ok.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 10:18 am to tBrand
Because don’t most broken plays that don’t result in a sack involve a qb trying to advance the ball by running
You either
A. Get sacked
B. Scramble or run with the ball
A distant C. Throw the ball away
You either
A. Get sacked
B. Scramble or run with the ball
A distant C. Throw the ball away
Posted on 11/12/25 at 10:19 am to Tiger97
Facts seem to upset the Aggies on this site but facts are still facts.
Offenses they’ve faced according to SP+:
UTSA - 45
Utah State - 51
ND - 6 (gave up 40)
Auburn - 62
Miss St. - 36
Florida - 72
Arky - 7 (gave up 42)
LSU - 63
Mizzou - 28
SEC conference schedule opponent record:
13-34 (Including USCe and Texas)
Offenses they’ve faced according to SP+:
UTSA - 45
Utah State - 51
ND - 6 (gave up 40)
Auburn - 62
Miss St. - 36
Florida - 72
Arky - 7 (gave up 42)
LSU - 63
Mizzou - 28
SEC conference schedule opponent record:
13-34 (Including USCe and Texas)
This post was edited on 11/12/25 at 10:26 am
Posted on 11/12/25 at 10:20 am to Lonnie Utah
quote:
You will be after this Saturday...
I haven’t watch SC this year. Is Sellers not playing well? He feasted on us last year.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News