Started By
Message

re: For all the barners who cried “Alabama is just going to vacate the win anyway” yesterday

Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:17 pm to
Posted by Hateradedrink
Member since May 2023
4143 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

He never played pro. He played in a minor league. Never set foot in an NBA game.


Holy frick this sentence is incredible. Alabama fans are actually retarded and illiterate
Posted by labamafan
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2007
26866 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:19 pm to
Yes Baylor player and any European professional player. Auburn has one on their roster. There are currently 25 professional players playing college basketball now.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
54194 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

Holy frick this sentence is incredible. Alabama fans are actually retarded and illiterate


If they talk enough they may rewrite history
Posted by Lucado
Member since Nov 2023
3583 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

The NCAA will not punish because the order states they can’t do it.


The temporary order certainly states that. You have no idea what you're talking about, as usual.
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9204 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Quit being dishonest. Is there another example of a player leaving college, entering the draft, playing pro and returning?


You're correct. I don't think one case has had all of these things together.

The reason Bediako's case will at least be heard and argued is that all of those things have indeed been overlooked by the NCAA in certain other cases.

For example, players have been granted eligibility by the NCAA:

after entering NBA draft
after being drafted in the NBA draft
after playing in the G League
after playing professionally (and for higher $ contracts)
after leaving college and returning even well outside the 5 year window


One thing to note. Bediako was not an American player, but an international player from Canada ineligible for NIL when he left college. Not sure how this is being/will be argued either way but it adds another layer to the case.

All a lawyer has to do is piece together enough of these "exceptions" the NCAA has granted and the picture is anything but "consistent" and it's easy to make a case for the next exception that is at least strong enough to go to trial.

Posted by Contra
Member since Oct 2016
9286 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

Charles Bediako did not play in an actual NBA regular-season game. Although he signed a two-way contract with the San Antonio Spurs after going undrafted in 2023, he only played in the NBA G League for the Motor City Cruise. In January 2026, he returned to college basketball at Alabama following a legal challenge.
Posted by deltadummy
Member since Mar 2025
2006 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

5* local booster judge for the win!


NIL transfer. Didn't come out of law school as a 5*. We develop our judges. Maybe give it a try.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
54194 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

Charles Bediako did not play in an actual NBA regular-season game. Although he signed a two-way contract with the San Antonio Spurs after going undrafted in 2023, he only played in the NBA G League for the Motor City Cruise. In January 2026, he returned to college basketball at Alabama following a legal challenge.


Oh my how the goalposts have shifted. Let's just not mention the preseason games he played over the course of two years in the NBA.
This post was edited on 2/8/26 at 2:39 pm
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9204 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

That article is simply about the TRO being granted.


Exactly: by a local judge which is how all of these cases are heard. In the district where the player resides.


Well, except for the Indiana football player. His is actually the one case that was not heard by a local judge and that was so Indiana's lawyers could get it farther away from NCAA headquarters.

This thread and your posts in it were about venue and the protection a Temporary Restraining Order provides not about whether any of the cases will eventually be successful.

Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
51835 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

The NCAA will not punish because the order states they can’t do it. Again, wishful thinking.

I am illegitimate and reckless but you cannot do anything to stop me so says I!!
This post was edited on 2/8/26 at 2:40 pm
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
54194 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

Exactly: by a local judge which is how all of these cases are heard. In the district where the player resides.


Well, except for the Indiana football player. His is actually the one case that was not heard by a local judge and that was so Indiana's lawyers could get it farther away from NCAA headquarters.

This thread and your posts in it were about venue and the protection a Temporary Restraining Order provides not about whether any of the cases will eventually be successful.



What are you even arguing about at this point? No kidding a local judge heard it. My post you are responding to has nothing to do with venue. The TRO is just that - temporary. Has no bearing on the overall resolution.
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
51835 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

Exactly: by a local judge which is how all of these cases are heard. In the district where the player resides.

By an unprofessional Alabama booster is what you meant
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9204 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

HailToTheChiz


I'm merely stating that

1) it's almost always local judge in all these cases because they are filed where the player resides.

2) A Temporary Restraining Order will protect Indiana, Alabama or Texas A&M from any future NCAA punishment from playing these players while the TRO is in effect. Period. That's the entire logic of the TRO.

Posted by borotiger
Murfreesboro Tennessee
Member since Jan 2004
14189 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

even the NCAA president is saying the courts rule


Of course the courts rule. A temporary restraining order is just that, temporary. The courts haven't ruled yet or it wouldn't be temporary.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
54194 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

any future NCAA punishment from playing these players while the TRO is in effect.


We finally agree.

Once the TRO is dissolved and he's ruled ineligible, the NCAA can do as they see fit to punish a member of the NCAA who blatantly cheats
Posted by Foy
Member since Nov 2009
4707 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 3:02 pm to
Don't really understand the point of putting the biggest crosshair in college athletics on yourself for Bediako. Was it just to beat the worst Auburn team in 10 years and try and fail to beat Tennessee? Anyone who has watched their games with him back know Alabama's biggest potential accomplishment this year is maybe an SEC Tourny champ.
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9204 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 3:03 pm to
quote:


We finally agree.

Once the TRO is dissolved and he's ruled ineligible, the NCAA can do as they see fit to punish a member of the NCAA who blatantly cheats


Yes. If Alabama plays Bediako for one game when not under the protection of a Temporary Retaining Order they are screwed.

If they only play him until then, they are completely 100% protected since it would be an unprecedented legal system event for the NCAA (of all entities) to attempt to undermine the entire purpose of Temporary Retaining Orders.

Posted by au4you
Alabama
Member since Dec 2010
3128 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

If they only play him until then, they are completely 100% protected since it would be an unprecedented legal system event for the NCAA (of all entities) to attempt to undermine the entire purpose of Temporary Retaining Orders.
The TRO doesn’t have offer any protections when it’s not in effect.

“unprecedented legal system event” made me chuckle
Posted by AHM21
Member since Feb 2008
31121 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 3:24 pm to
It warms my heart that Auburn fans are melting over this because they lost again to Oats and Alabama.

Take away that one win and Oats still owns Auburn. Add that one win and he owns daddy and son
Posted by au4you
Alabama
Member since Dec 2010
3128 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

It warms my heart that Auburn fans are melting over this because they lost again to Oats and Alabama. Take away that one win and Oats still owns Auburn. Add that one win and he owns daddy and son
Touch grass buddy. Adults are talking
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter