Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/18/18 at 7:41 am to Sean Bean
The East is putrid.
Posted on 7/18/18 at 7:44 am to Rabern57
quote:
quote:
1. Alabama: 17-0 (1.000)
We know who has played the weakest schedule against the East since 2012.
They played the East champ 4 times over that period in addition to the regular season games...still 17-0
Posted on 7/18/18 at 7:51 am to CNB
quote:
Yeah let’s fix a temporary problem with a permanent solution
Just do away with divisions, add a conference game, take the top two teams and put them in the championship game.
Posted on 7/18/18 at 7:52 am to Sean Bean
Send us some help from the West for fricks sake. Mizzou has the 2nd best record, that tells you how pitiful this is
UT should petition to get Bama off their schedule. UT, Mizzou, Scar and Vandy should all get to play Arkansas and Ole Miss
UT should petition to get Bama off their schedule. UT, Mizzou, Scar and Vandy should all get to play Arkansas and Ole Miss
Posted on 7/18/18 at 7:58 am to bamafan1001
If you did that, you might as well cut the dead weight and just have a 6 team conference. There are teams that have no chance of ever winning an SEC championship, just get rid of them
Posted on 7/18/18 at 7:58 am to Rabern57
quote:
1. Alabama: 17-0 (1.000)
We know who has played the weakest schedule against the East since 2012.
We also know who has won 3 NC since 2012
(should have been 4
) 
Posted on 7/18/18 at 7:58 am to bamafan1001
quote:
Just do away with divisions, add a conference game, take the top two teams and put them in the championship game.
If you do away with divisions, why would we need a 9th game? The team rotation would be faster even at 8.
Posted on 7/18/18 at 8:00 am to Sean Bean
Just think if auburn was in the east they would be #2. But there in the west at #6.
But they are above.500.
But they are above.500.
Posted on 7/18/18 at 8:13 am to TouchdownToCauseHell
Georgia is 2-4 against South Carolina and 3-3 against Florida since the latest expansion. Let's not act like you've been dominating the East.
This post was edited on 7/18/18 at 8:14 am
Posted on 7/18/18 at 8:24 am to meansonny
quote:
If you do away with divisions, why would we need a 9th game? The team rotation would be faster even at 8.
Yep. Lock in three permanent opponents per team, and you do a home-and-home with every conference opponent every 4 years (it takes 12 years right now). I'd be fine with going to 9 either way (and it should already be happening under the current set up), but 8 games makes things nice and tidy without divisions.
Posted on 7/18/18 at 8:28 am to meansonny
quote:
If you do away with divisions, why would we need a 9th game?
Just because I want a 9th game lol. Also would lessen the possibility of more than two teams having undefeated conference records(which I think would be possible)
Posted on 7/18/18 at 9:40 am to bamafan1001
quote:
They played the East champ 4 times over that period in addition to the regular season games...still 17-0
It's actually 5 times.
Posted on 7/18/18 at 9:44 am to WRhodesTider
quote:
It's actually 5 times.
Nice catch
Posted on 7/18/18 at 9:54 am to Sean Bean
7. Tennessee: 0-12 (.000)
This post was edited on 7/18/18 at 9:55 am
Posted on 7/18/18 at 1:03 pm to bamafan1001
quote:
Just because I want a 9th game lol.
Typical gump scheduling.
Remember complaints about how your opponents had a bye week before they played Bama?
Conference scheduling is done by the conference. Bama gets very limited say. Which sometimes leads to griping (see Auburn fans on a regular basis, and occasionally includes Bama).
As opposed to nonconference scheduling where you can schedule who and where for any of those matchups.
You would rather rotate more Kentucky, Vandy, Arkansas, Ole Miss, and Missouri (remember that half of the league is below average) than control your scheduling and build up your SOS?
I get the desire to see the league more often. But that can be fixed outside of divisions. 9 games is a hindrance for all other scenarios.
Posted on 7/18/18 at 1:15 pm to Sean Bean
Mr. Bean
Is it just me, or every time you post league stats LSU comes up at #2.
I’m not happy being second best, but considering it’s to bama it means something.
More importantly, it means LSU is better than every other program in the SEC.
Is it just me, or every time you post league stats LSU comes up at #2.
I’m not happy being second best, but considering it’s to bama it means something.
More importantly, it means LSU is better than every other program in the SEC.
Posted on 7/18/18 at 1:18 pm to bamafan1001
Posted on 7/18/18 at 1:19 pm to Sean Bean
Geaux Tigas
Posted on 7/18/18 at 2:19 pm to Cdawg
quote:
The same shitball east team that was LSU's permanent before the latest expansion.
?
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News