Started By
Message

re: Do new decades end with a zero or a one?

Posted on 5/13/25 at 1:02 pm to
Posted by yakster
Member since Mar 2021
3287 posts
Posted on 5/13/25 at 1:02 pm to
How else you gonna celebrate a year? It has to happen before you can count it.
Posted by lefty08
Not in Auburn or Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
6408 posts
Posted on 5/13/25 at 1:18 pm to
Haha. They did say the game winning field goal should have never happened. Haha. Not much different.
Posted by deputyfife
Member since Dec 2013
1390 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 12:24 am to
Did the third milennium AD start on January 1, 2000, or January 1, 2001?

I view the larger place digit as the driver of this. For example, 12 midnight is AM to me.
Posted by FAT SEXY
California
Member since Jun 2020
1159 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 12:46 am to
They end with a 9
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
34065 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 5:07 am to
New decades start with year 1, because logically there was never a year “0”
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
49181 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 5:50 am to
Did the millennium decade start in 2000 or 2001?

2000

To say otherwise is foolish. Damn Wilie!!!

This post was edited on 5/14/25 at 5:53 am
Posted by TheGreek
Historic Brookhaven
Member since Jun 2012
286 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 10:47 am to
No doubt, AU football has not been fun for years. Hell, with the Falcons struggles along with UA and UGA dominating, football has almost become an afterthought.

I'm hopeful for 2025 in the sense that it can't be worse, but legitimately I won't be surprised to see AU lose big again.


Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
17218 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 11:50 am to
quote:

Have you guys ever thought about how, on the day after your first birthday, you're actually celebrating the second occurrence of that day in your lifetime? And that even just a second after your first 'birth day you're already in your 2nd year of life?

Long story short, if you're 39, you're really actually 40


Ask someone from South Korea how old they are and they will often ask if you mean their Korean agae or international age.

Korean age considers you 1 year old at birth and your age increases 1 year each January 1st.

Someone born December 31st would be considered 2 years old when they have been alive for 2 days.

The logic behind it is that you are aging in the womb and for most births, conception occurred the previous year so they consider you to be 1 at birth. Aging everyone up at January 1 makes it easier to figure ages based on year of birth. They still celebrate birthdays, but do not age up on the birthday.
This post was edited on 5/14/25 at 12:01 pm
Posted by PHLaggie
Member since May 2021
301 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 12:49 pm to
Reminds me of the Seinfeld episode originally aired in 1997.

KRAMER: It all right if I keep these here for a while? I'm having a New Year's Eve
party.

JERRY: You're gonna keep these here for eight months?!

Kramer props the chairs up against a wall.

KRAMER: No, Jerry. New Year's Eve nineteen ninety-nine. The millennium. I told you about that.

.
.
.

Kramer and Newman move to the door to leave. Newman stops as Jerry speaks to
him, and Kramer exits to his apartment.

JERRY: By the way Newman, I'm just curious. When you booked the hotel, did you
book it for the millennium New Year?

NEWMAN: (smug) As a matter of fact, I did.

JERRY: Oh, that's interesting, because as everyone knows, since there was no year zero, the millennium doesn't begin until the year two-thousand and one. Which would make your party, one year late, and thus, quite lame.

Newman absorbs the logic of Jerry's argument. His face twitches as he realises
his error.

JERRY: Aww!

Newman makes a noise redolent of his frustration - a sort of half-strangulated
nasal squeak. He then waddles away after Kramer.

LINK
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39429 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

Long story short, if you're 39, you're really actually 40


Well, no. If you're 39, you are in your 40th year but you haven't actually achieved 40 yet. That would be like saying if i've run 1.5 miles, i've actually run 2 miles. No, you are just in your 2nd mile.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39429 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

Korean age considers you 1 year old at birth and your age increases 1 year each January 1st.



A very interesting way to do it, considering even the longest of pregnancies don't last a year and a decent number of people are born premautre. So, your Korean age is at best 3 months older than you actually are and at worst could be ~5 ish or so.
Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
21562 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 1:47 pm to
So...if we trace it back logically. Was there a year zero AD/CE?

It turns out, there was not. When counting years, they go directly from 1 BC/BCE to 1 AD/CE. So, the first decade was year 1 through year 10. Every decade since, follows the same pattern. That means that the year 2000 was not the start of the new Millennium, but rather was the last year of the old Millennium. So, the 21st century did not start on January 1, 2000...but actually started January 1, 2001.

So, to answer your question in a roundabout way...Auburn does not have a winning season in football this decade.
Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
17218 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

considering even the longest of pregnancies don't last a year and a decent number of people are born premautre. So, your Korean age is at best 3 months older than you actually are and at worst could be ~5 ish or so.


Keep in mind they age up at January 1, not the conception or birth date. The majority of babies born this year would have been conceived and in the womb prior to January 1st.
Posted by BigBro
Member since Jul 2021
19489 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 3:53 pm to
A decade, in terms of the common way it's used to categorize history and culture, typically starts on a year ending in 0. However, technically, in terms of a strictly numbered count, a decade starts on a year ending in 1. This is because there was no year zero, and the current era began with year 1.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39429 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Keep in mind they age up at January 1, not the conception or birth date. The majority of babies born this year would have been conceived and in the womb prior to January 1st.


So, let's say that you are born at the end of the year. When you are born, you are considered 1. Then Jan 1, you are aged up a year? So, someone born in like October or something, would be 2 years old on Jan 1, even though in reality they are only 2 months old from birth? Do I have this system correct in my head?
This post was edited on 5/14/25 at 3:59 pm
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
27765 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

This is because there was no year zero, and the current era began with year 1.



But it doesn't become Year 1 until the year is complete. During the year it is Year 0. Or more recently, Year 00.
Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
17218 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

So, someone born in like October or something, would be 2 years old on Jan 1, even though in reality they are only 2 months old from birth? Do I have this system correct in my head?


Yep. In my original post I used the extreme example of being born on 12/31. On day 2 of your life, you would be 2 years old.
The younger Koreans are going away from this. They will usually answer the question of how old they are by stating the year they were born.
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
9233 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 8:12 am to
quote:

That would be like saying if i've run 1.5 miles, i've actually run 2 miles. No, you are just in your 2nd mile.


Sounds like those commercials/ads that claim “It’s under $200” (with the price at $199.99 or $199.95).
Posted by southernboisb
Member since Dec 2012
9233 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 8:20 am to
The debate is when does it start?

At the start of time, the first 365 days occurred in the 1st year; BUT we don’t acknowledge COMPLETION of the year until the 366th day.

So, that time span, while being IN the 1st year would be called “Year 0”.
This post was edited on 5/15/25 at 8:25 am
Posted by BigBro
Member since Jul 2021
19489 posts
Posted on 5/15/25 at 8:58 am to
3 BC
2 BC
1 BC
1 AD
2 AD

There was no Year 0 AD.

Idk why they did that.. but most of the world uses it..

Going back to the Bible.

1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.

3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day.


The earth was there on Day 0, but nothing was there. A good attorney coud argue both sides and win this argument.

I’m not an attorney, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn last night..
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter