Started By
Message
re: Dirtiest SEC coach in history? Phillip Fulmer
Posted on 4/18/24 at 7:25 pm to Nate Forrest
Posted on 4/18/24 at 7:25 pm to Nate Forrest
quote:
"Them thar maths ain't my thang...they gots a 31% wins percentage...duh huh."
What a bandwagon riding moron. Literally too stupid to be in the conversation.
Wait, your stupid arse might have graduated from Bama. Simple math escapes you.
Let me know when you figure out what "over the past 63 years" means.
1
Posted on 4/18/24 at 7:28 pm to TheFourHorsemen
Your mom likely told you, you could be anything you wanted to be when you grew up. And you chose to be a bitch?
That’s just messed up man.
That’s just messed up man.
Posted on 4/18/24 at 7:31 pm to Nate Forrest
quote:
want to do "GOT 18" next?
Sure, why not. You got your arse handed to you in that thread just like you are in this one.
Posted on 4/18/24 at 7:34 pm to 3down10
quote:Let me know when your incredibly stupid arse can do simple math.
Let me know when you figure out what "over the past 63 years" means.
fricking moron.
You want to cherry pick years so you can include the Saban years, but drop all the others.
What an insignificant little man. Talking shite about something you made ZERO contribution to...NOTHING.
This post was edited on 4/18/24 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 4/18/24 at 7:37 pm to captdalton
quote:Link to that thread?
Sure, why not. You got your arse handed to you in that thread just like you are in this one.
Posted on 4/18/24 at 8:04 pm to Nate Forrest
quote:
Let me know when your incredibly stupid arse can do simple math.
fricking moron.
You want to cherry pick years so you can include the Saban years, but drop all the others.
What an insignificant little man. Talking shite about something you made ZERO contribution to...NOTHING.
So you don't want to count Saban's years, but you accuse me of cherry picking because I started in 1960(a year tennessee won).
Posted on 4/18/24 at 8:13 pm to 3down10
quote:I counted ALL the years, you stupid, Stupid, STUPID bandwagon riding, fricking moron.
So you don't want to count Saban's years, but you accuse me of cherry picking because I started in 1960(a year tennessee won).
WTF is this? Get someone with an IQ above 60 to explain it to your imbecilic arse.
quote:
Okay, add your Saban record. Your win percentage is a screaming .605.
Read it again, you dumbass. I included ALL years.
All means every year.
Once again...ALL
quote:
Okay, add your Saban record. Your win percentage is a screaming .605.
You are too stupid to be in this conversation. :rotflmao:
Posted on 4/18/24 at 8:14 pm to paperwasp
quote:
No way that is real. Phat Man would not fail to consume chicken or fall down in pursuit of a bucket.
Posted on 4/18/24 at 8:37 pm to Nate Forrest
quote:
Up through 2006 the record was 44-37-7.
You won 44/88 games. A .500 record. How dominate.
Okay, add your Saban record. Your win percentage is a screaming .605.
This post was edited on 4/18/24 at 8:45 pm
Posted on 4/18/24 at 8:42 pm to 3down10
quote:
Up through 2006 the record was 44-37-7.
You won 44/88 games. A .500 record. How dominate.
Okay, add your Saban record. Your win percentage is a screaming .605.
Yes, you stupid, Stupid, STUPID bandwagon rider.
I posted the stats for ALL games.
quote:
.605
That is all 91 games.
YOU. ARE. TOO. STUPID. TO. BE. IN. THIS. CONVERSATION.
Posted on 4/18/24 at 8:49 pm to Nate Forrest
quote:
quote:
Up through 2006 the record was 44-37-7.
You won 44/88 games. A .500 record. How dominate.
Okay, add your Saban record. Your win percentage is a screaming .605.
Yes, you stupid, Stupid, STUPID bandwagon rider.
I posted the stats for ALL games.
quote:
.605
That is all 91 games.
YOU. ARE. TOO. STUPID. TO. BE. IN. THIS. CONVERSATION.
44-37-7 is not a .500 record. It's a .543 record. Ties do not count as losses, no matter how desperate Tennessee is for wins.
What you mean to say is they win 50% of the time compared to Tennessee winning 42% of the time...up until the 2006 cherry picked date. With Saban, it's 60%.
Not that it matters since in the past 60 years, the time period in which any of us have lived, Its closer to 70% vs 30%.
This post was edited on 4/18/24 at 8:56 pm
Posted on 4/18/24 at 9:01 pm to 3down10
Yes. Fulmer was a subpar coach with elite talent. I 100% agree with that. Yes. He was a backstabbing piece of shite that should have 3 natties at minimum. Yes. He was piece of shot athletic director that got us beaten by Georgia St all to make himself look like a savior.
I'm a UT fan but I God dam despise that MFer. He is a complete piece of shite.
I'm a UT fan but I God dam despise that MFer. He is a complete piece of shite.
Posted on 4/18/24 at 9:01 pm to 3down10
quote:
44-37-7 is not a .500 record. It's a .543 record. Ties do not count as losses, no matter how desperate Tennessee is for wins.
What you mean to say is they win 50% of the time compared to Tennessee winning 42% of the time.
Not that it matters since in the past 60 years, the time period in which any of us have lived, Its closer to 70% vs 30%.
You won 50% of 88 games.
No, you stupid frick, it'a NEVER been close to 70% of the games.
The best you have ever had is a .605 record. That is NOW.
What part of .605 are you too fricking stupid to understand?
70%
You bandwagon riding cocksuckers are the worst. It means more to your worthless asses than it does the people who played at Bama.
.605....your best EVER. Not 61%...NOT 70%
Posted on 4/18/24 at 9:15 pm to Nate Forrest
quote:
You won 50% of 88 games.
No, you stupid frick, it'a NEVER been close to 70% of the games.
The best you have ever had is a .605 record. That is NOW.
What part of .605 are you too fricking stupid to understand?
70%
You bandwagon riding cocksuckers are the worst. It means more to your worthless asses than it does the people who played at Bama.
.605....your best EVER. Not 61%...NOT 70%
You'll do anything to avoid admitting Tennessee has been getting it's arse kicked regularly since 1960.
Posted on 4/18/24 at 9:28 pm to 3down10
quote:
You'll do anything to avoid admitting Tennessee has been getting it's arse kicked regularly since 1960.
I'm listing the record for all 91 games. It is .605
Your insignificant self has nothing in life except the accomplishments of kids at a college, where you have zero real connection.
Think about that. You are a sad and pathetic little man, with very low intelligence resources.
Your record against UT is .605. Not .700 like you so desperately want to claim.
Posted on 4/18/24 at 9:48 pm to Nate Forrest
quote:
I'm listing the record for all 91 games. It is .605
Your insignificant self has nothing in life except the accomplishments of kids at a college, where you have zero real connection.
Think about that. You are a sad and pathetic little man, with very low intelligence resources.
Your record against UT is .605. Not .700 like you so desperately want to claim.
No, the record against Tennessee since 1960 is around .700 and the all time record is around .600 and growing.
It's basic math even if you want to pretend otherwise.
As for everything else, you are the one so invested in all this you can't keep your composure about yourself long enough to keep from getting banned over and over. I think you are projecting. I guess being forced to argue your losing record isn't as bad as it looks can do that to a man.
This post was edited on 4/18/24 at 9:52 pm
Posted on 4/18/24 at 10:00 pm to 3down10
quote:Quit trying to cherry pick, you pathetic excuse for a man.
No, the record against Tennessee since 1960 is around .700
The record is .605 lifetime.
Your insignificant self has nothing in life except the accomplishments of kids at a college, where you have zero real connection.
.605 NOT .700
Idiot.
Posted on 4/18/24 at 10:03 pm to 3down10
quote:
you are the one so invested in all this
You’ve been responding to this thread for 2 days homie. You’re plenty invested. Not as much as the dude you’re flirting with right now but you know, glass houses and whatnot.
This post was edited on 4/18/24 at 10:04 pm
Posted on 4/18/24 at 10:07 pm to TigerLunatik
The king of dirty 
Posted on 4/18/24 at 10:08 pm to 3down10
quote:Okay, you pathetic little man.
It's basic math even if you want to pretend otherwise.
Let's cherry pick.
We're only going to use 1995-2004
UT has a .900 record against you.
Wait...go 1982 through 2006.
UT has a .580 record against you.
NO, let's use 1950 - 1960.
UT is .818
Now, you very stupid, pitiful little man. Do you see how cherry picking works?
The record is .605.
Page 5 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News