Started By
Message
re: Dexter McCluster -vs- Trindon Holliday
Posted on 9/25/09 at 1:26 pm to MemphisJerk
Posted on 9/25/09 at 1:26 pm to MemphisJerk
McCluster by alot. Sorry tiger fans, he actually knows how to break tackles. The speed difference isn't that relevant when you can be taken down by a stiff breeze.
Posted on 9/25/09 at 1:39 pm to MemphisJerk
McCluster...this shouldn't be close.
Posted on 9/25/09 at 1:42 pm to shawshank39
i don't think we are utilizing trindon enough, but watching the game last nite it seems that mccluster may be tougher to bring down. Maybe a harder runner. I think we have to get the ball to trindon in space and let his speed work for us.
Posted on 9/25/09 at 1:46 pm to shawshank39
trindon > dexter. dexter is overrated
Posted on 11/14/09 at 12:41 pm to shawshank39
McCluster... he has better hands, is a better runner and a better receiver. Holliday may be faster but he is not a better football player
Posted on 11/14/09 at 1:22 pm to shawshank39
McCluster. What has Holliday even done this season? I remember him being in the game against Alabama maybe a couple of times.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 1:24 pm to shawshank39
quote:
Who would you rather have on your team?
The one that helped his team win an SEC championship, a national championship and a BCS bowl game.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 1:26 pm to siliconvalleytiger
Mc Cluster sorry trindon should be a special teams guy and that is it. He is not a good rb only because he gets knocked down to easy first contact. McCluster is fast enough and a better runner.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 1:27 pm to labamafan
McCluster is just a better football player... Trindon is a track guy
Posted on 11/14/09 at 1:37 pm to siliconvalleytiger
quote:
The one that helped his team win an SEC championship, a national championship and a BCS bowl game.
True, but don't you think McCluster would have made LSU more dangerous on offense in 2007?
Posted on 11/14/09 at 1:40 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
True, but don't you think McCluster would have made LSU more dangerous on offense in 2007?
McCluster would have been an impact player, in 2007 Holliday had:
364 yards Rushing 2 TD 6 Yard Average
3 Yards receiving on 2 catches
and here is where he was most useful,
19 Kickoffs 498 Yards 26 Yard Average 1 TD
1 Punt Return 0 yards
I think McCluster could have easily had those numbers even with Scott, Hester, Williams in front.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 1:40 pm to shawshank39
Anybody that would rather have Holliday over McCluster is either a fricking idiot or just a Goddamn homer. They are both fast, but one is actually a good football player, and that one isn't Holliday. I would rather TH on my track team though.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 1:44 pm to shawshank39
Trindon when nobody knew about him, but definitely McCluster now
Posted on 11/14/09 at 1:51 pm to LSUpsychWARD
I'm watching McCluster rape the Tennessee defense right now, so as much as I love Holliday I'm going to say McCluster. Now if we gave Holliday hte ball as much as McCluster is getting it I may change my mind.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 1:58 pm to shawshank39
quote:
Dexter McCluster -vs- Trindon Holliday
Who would you rather have on your team?
McCluster, every day of the week.
Posted on 11/14/09 at 2:00 pm to SLC
If its Football,its not close=its DM
Posted on 11/14/09 at 2:02 pm to SLC
McCluster > Holliday
Shepard >> McCluster
Shepard >> McCluster
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News