Started By
Message
re: Dallas Turner's hit was perfect according to NCAA rule book
Posted on 11/7/23 at 7:24 pm to tigerbait17
Posted on 11/7/23 at 7:24 pm to tigerbait17
quote:
If you truly feel it wasn't targeting
I don’t feel it. I know it. So did all the officials and the replay booth.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 7:25 pm to JayAg
quote:
Player tried to teabag him, he gave him an upper cut to the jewels. Maybe post what lead to that lmao
quote:
JayAg
So you’re okay with assault because a player stood over him? Glad to have that on record.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 7:28 pm to MykTide
You are also biased. We disagree. I wont change your opinion. You wont change mine. All is good.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 7:31 pm to tigerbait17
quote:
I wont change your opinion
That’s because it’s not an opinion. It’s an undeniable fact. There was no targeting called due to there was no targeting. Per the officials and rules of football.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 7:32 pm to texag7
This didn’t need another thread. Board has been in the shitter for awhile.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 7:33 pm to texag7
quote:LOL
Video shows he did not launch
Posted on 11/7/23 at 7:55 pm to texag7
quote:
Dallas Turner's hit was perfect according to NCAA rule book by texag7Put a hard but legal hit on an opposing player. Beautiful and should be used in every high school in America as a great example
Sometimes you just got to call a spade a spade and a idiot an idiot.
However, when posters see Texag7 they already know you are an idiot.
If the hit was perfect and legal he wouldnt have been penalized for roughing the passer and was a textbook violation. All the debate is over targeting. Nothing of that hit was legal… and you are an idiot
Posted on 11/7/23 at 8:14 pm to FoTownBam
Helen Keller has better eyesight than you.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 8:30 pm to djsdawg
quote:
It is also…..
Any forcible contact to head/neck of a defenseless player.
Seems like he nailed him in the chin.
If so, Not a legal hit.
Facemask was planted in the chest. There wasn't a blow to the head/neck as defined in the rules. This was confirmed by the booth review
Posted on 11/7/23 at 8:44 pm to MykTide
quote:
That’s because it’s not an opinion. It’s an undeniable fact. There was no targeting called due to there was no targeting. Per the officials and rules of football.
No call was made. Myself and plenty others feel a call should have been made. We disagree. Fair enough.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 9:09 pm to texag7
quote:
TexAg7
How does it feel to be such an insecure little bitch?
Posted on 11/7/23 at 9:11 pm to texag7
It wasn’t targeting….never thought it was…Turner wasn’t penalized for targeting, but for riding Daniels and pounding him to the ground…totally unnecessary and intentional….he’s definitely allowed to tackle the QB and bring him down….but driving him to the hard turf was the reason to be penalized. It’s essentially a body slam, which is overkill, almost always resulting in injury to the QB.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 9:43 pm to droliver
quote:
Facemask was planted in the chest. There wasn't a blow to the head/neck as defined in the rules. This was confirmed by the booth review
The angles we had weren’t great. Not good enough to confirm a shot to the chin, but it very well could have been. Unsure if relay had better angles.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 9:50 pm to texag7
Then I hope your child is the next to take a hit like that. Then y’all could have matching teeth or what’s left of them.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 10:01 pm to djsdawg
Ga you know you are skeered be prepared for what's coming
Posted on 11/7/23 at 10:22 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
I don’t know how you LSU fans can see anything through all of the tears the last 3 days. Clearly suffering from emotional blindness
Posted on 11/10/23 at 9:28 pm to texag7
Corndogs don’t understand how rules work. They just can’t seem to accept that L from last week
Posted on 11/10/23 at 10:02 pm to texag7
Since none of these fit the hit on Harrison in the Peach Bowl, and Saban still said it was targeting, I'll assume Nick thinks Turner should have been tossed.
Popular
Back to top


1









