Started By
Message
re: Dallas Turner's hit was perfect according to NCAA rule book
Posted on 11/7/23 at 5:42 pm to Pandy Fackler
Posted on 11/7/23 at 5:42 pm to Pandy Fackler
quote:
There's no reason at all to not trust the officials. Defer to the experts.

Yeah, I saw a whole lot of Alabama fans "deferring to the experts" after the Tennessee game last year.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 5:43 pm to texag7
The only hit that was harder was Alabama fan’s nuts hitting your chin
Posted on 11/7/23 at 5:45 pm to MetryMauler
quote:
Wow, you buried almost the entirety of the dumb t-shirt Bama fans on this board in one post. Well done!
That's why the ref arguments are dumb. Through Bama's own doing and some head scratching calls/no calls, Bama still had the chance to win the game in regulation. The loss was their's alone. The ref excuse is always just that, an excuse.
quote:
Coach Bryant - The same thing(s) win, that always won... And we just have a different bunch of excuses if we lose

This post was edited on 11/7/23 at 5:52 pm
Posted on 11/7/23 at 6:00 pm to texag7
I don't know how you can speak with so much Bama dick in your mouth. I'm going with Lane Kiffins opinion over yours.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 6:03 pm to texag7
Stfu you little pussy bitch.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 6:32 pm to ALhunter
They should just do away with the targeting rule any ways. It has been stupid since it started and it’s so fluid it is hard to keep up with what is and is not targeting. They are paid now, which makes them professional athletes whether we like it or not. Leave unnecessary roughness in and move on.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 6:46 pm to texag7
We know what’s legal now
No repercussions when lsu head hunts next year
No problems
No repercussions when lsu head hunts next year
No problems
Posted on 11/7/23 at 6:47 pm to nicholastiger
Oh no! I bet Bama is petrified!
Posted on 11/7/23 at 6:54 pm to Thorny
What’s is #41 on Alabama doing ?
Posted on 11/7/23 at 6:57 pm to texag7
Texasag7 has to be Tuscaloosa
Posted on 11/7/23 at 6:57 pm to footstepsfalco
The worst are when a WR is falling, but falling faster than the DB, who intended to go low for the hit. It's a completely subjective rule and not uniformly applied.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 6:59 pm to UnoMe
quote:
What’s is #41 on Alabama doing ?
Lol. I was convinced hands to the face from the still shots. He has a handful of jersey on that slo-mo view with no hands to the face.
Let's get 12 more threads on that debate now.
Posted on 11/7/23 at 7:02 pm to Che Boludo
quote:
Lol. I was convinced hands to the face from the still shots. He has a handful of jersey on that slo-mo view with no hands to the face.
I unfortunately concur
quote:
Let's get 12 more threads on that debate now.
I sternly do not concur
Posted on 11/7/23 at 7:09 pm to Night Vision
quote:
If Dallas Turner ever needs an attorney, you can tell him how to consult one
That was brutal.

Posted on 11/7/23 at 7:14 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
We know what’s legal now
No repercussions when lsu head hunts next year
No problems

Posted on 11/7/23 at 7:22 pm to texag7
If you truly feel it wasn't targeting the you are simply ignorant. Or you are a biased bama fan. Or in your case you are a troll.
This hit happens in the NFL it is targeting and a healthy fine. We have seen so many targeting calls that were much less than this hit.
Honestly im tired of talking about it.
This hit happens in the NFL it is targeting and a healthy fine. We have seen so many targeting calls that were much less than this hit.
Honestly im tired of talking about it.
Popular
Back to top
