Started By
Message

re: Corruption...explain how that was not targeting?

Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:36 pm to
Posted by 49 to nada
In aggy and gooner heads, rent free
Member since Sep 2023
4894 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:36 pm to
You mean the same refs that called TD instead of 5 yd penalty when an ASU O-linemen bearhugged Skatterboi and tossed him into the endzone...that same crew? Idk what to tell you other than this..

We're 3 rounds deep into the playoffs, your team is in full off-season mode lol.
Posted by sumtimeitbeslikedat
Vidalia, La
Member since Nov 2013
4676 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

I hope they have life insurance. If a crazy goes after them, I’ll just shrug it away. Maybe the founding fathers had a point after all.


Good gracious, dude! It’s frickin football, not something to go to war or take a life for. Some of y’all are REALLY due for an off-season to cool off.
Posted by WoodyOrnamental
Member since Sep 2021
1360 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:37 pm to
Shouldn't have gone to overtime, junior. Biggest hose job I've seen in a long time.
Posted by TexasOnTop
Member since Nov 2023
5289 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:38 pm to
If the player has enough time to turn upfield, how are they defenseless?
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
40985 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

The Texas defender's head was completely up, he didn't launch into the receiver at all. There was nothing he could do, I thought it was the right call.


I agree with this. Minor dip of the chin so he didn’t hit facemask first. No time to go lower. No launch. No crown of helmet. People think all head to head contact is targeting. It’s not. They need to calm down before they make the rules even more stupid.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
74934 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

The fix is in for tx. Shocker
Then why did they call holding on UTa on the 2pt conversion and give ASU another chance at it? They could have easily blown it off.

Too many people cry like bitches when the team they pull for doesn't win. You look like pussies.
Posted by vidtiger23
Member since Feb 2012
5986 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

The Texas defender's head was completely up, he didn't launch into the receiver at all. There was nothing he could do, I thought it was the right call.

Irrelevant by rule. Defenseless player (check), hit to the head or neck (check) equals targeting.
Posted by WoodyOrnamental
Member since Sep 2021
1360 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:43 pm to
Shouldn't have gone to OT. Then comes they worst bs non-call I've seen in a good while.

Huge ***win
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
40985 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

Defenseless player (check), hit to the head or neck (check) equals targeting.


Nope.
Posted by ugasickem
Allatoona
Member since Nov 2010
11973 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:46 pm to
If that wasn't targeting, then targeting doesn't exist. Get rid of it. They obviously don't know to call
It
Posted by WoodyOrnamental
Member since Sep 2021
1360 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:47 pm to
Yep
Posted by Tx Trailblazer
Member since Aug 2021
94 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

If the player has enough time to turn upfield, how are they defenseless?


lol This was a defenseless player. Keep in mind this is in super slowmo and still obvious.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


"However, if a player is defenseless, you can’t initiate contact above the shoulders, even if you don’t lead with the crown.

Players are also prohibited from targeting and making forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless player with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder."
This post was edited on 1/1/25 at 4:55 pm
Posted by Gunga Din
Oklahoma
Member since Jul 2020
2445 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

Irrelevant by rule. Defenseless player (check), hit to the head or neck (check) equals targeting.


Is anybody else surprised that Texas fans don't know the rules and they are on here acting like they are experts.

You can't hit a defenseless player in the head or neck.

Doesn't matter if the defender uses the crown, can't help it.... or any of that other stuff or any of the other stuff Texas fans are saying on this thread.

The only way that wasn't targeting is if the ref had a different view of that play and Taffe actually didn't hit him in the face with his helmet.

The view they showed on replay didn't allow us to see any depth perception.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
40985 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:52 pm to
Definition of Targeting

Targeting occurs when a player uses any part of their body, typically the helmet, to make forcible contact with an opponent's head or neck. This includes:
Launching into an opponent with a hit to the head or neck area.

Using the crown of the helmet (the top of the helmet) to strike an opponent.

Forcibly hitting a defenseless player in the head or neck area, even with the shoulder, forearm, or hands.

The key aspect of the targeting rule is protecting players from high-impact hits to the head or neck, which can cause concussions, spinal injuries, or other life-threatening conditions.

Hit wasn’t avoidable and wasn’t especially forceful. We really don’t need ncaa to beef up this rule even more to meet the ridiculous standards yall are preaching.
Posted by SouthernInsanity
Shadows of Death Valley
Member since Nov 2012
21943 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

And the defender lowers their head to they make contact with the crown. That’s targeting


Go pull those confirmed targeting calls and AGAIN you will see and HEAR announcers and "rules officials" telling everyone that it doesn't have to be with the crown of the helmet.
Posted by volinknox
Member since Sep 2024
134 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 4:59 pm to
because there was no replay!
Posted by lastfan
Houston
Member since Nov 2015
8678 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

I’m not even an ASU fan but I fricking hate injustice and corruption. I hope they have life insurance. If a crazy goes after them, I’ll just shrug it away. Maybe the founding fathers had a point after all.

#psycho
Posted by TexasOnTop
Member since Nov 2023
5289 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:56 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


You picked the worst camera angle. You’re welcome for better ones. If the receiver has time to secure the catch and turn up field, they aren’t defenseless. Good no call.
Posted by TexasOnTop
Member since Nov 2023
5289 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

Go pull those confirmed targeting calls and AGAIN you will see and HEAR announcers and "rules officials" telling everyone that it doesn't have to be with the crown of the helmet.


Correct. If the defender launches, it’s targeting as well. This isn’t hard.
Posted by McMillan
Member since Jul 2018
6899 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 6:13 pm to
It's not like you guys weren't warned.

Now this conference is stuck with them. Damn shame.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter