Started By
Message
re: Color me shocked:Mizzou doesn’t cave to student demands
Posted on 6/13/20 at 8:35 pm to JesusQuintana
Posted on 6/13/20 at 8:35 pm to JesusQuintana
Nice to see that! Let’s hope they continue to stand their ground when the students start crying louder and louder...
Posted on 6/13/20 at 9:26 pm to lastfan
Here's the statement....
University of Missouri System President Mun Choi met Thursday with Leapheart, three of the school’s curators and leaders of the Legion of Black Collegians to discuss concerns related to the statue.
“The conversation was an example of the power of civil discourse and included discussion of complex issues and different perspectives,” Choi said in a statement. “After further discussion with other curators, the university decided not to remove the Jefferson statue. We learn from history. We contextualize historical figures with complex legacies. We don’t remove history.”
LINK
University of Missouri System President Mun Choi met Thursday with Leapheart, three of the school’s curators and leaders of the Legion of Black Collegians to discuss concerns related to the statue.
“The conversation was an example of the power of civil discourse and included discussion of complex issues and different perspectives,” Choi said in a statement. “After further discussion with other curators, the university decided not to remove the Jefferson statue. We learn from history. We contextualize historical figures with complex legacies. We don’t remove history.”
LINK
Posted on 6/13/20 at 9:42 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
Plans to keep Thomas Jefferson statue
First, I am in full favor of removing all CSA related symbols, honors and remembrances of any sort from federal lands/properties and institutions that receive federal tax monies. I'd extend that to include state owned and supported entities as well... they are a part of the Union. However, my opinion on that has nothing to do with slavery. It has everything to do with honoring traitors and oath breakers.
Many will disagree, but it is just my opinion, which doesn't mean much.
That said, at some point we have to open a history book and realize that slavery (as disgusting a practice and wrongful racially/ethnically driven caste system that it was) happened and was a legal accepted practice. That does not discredit all other actions of historically significant people who legally participated in the system.
The US founding fathers nor the early English/Spanish settlers who first brought slaves into what is now the United States did not invent slavery.
Hell, the first documented "legal slave owner" in the colonies was a black, tobacco farmer in Virginia named Anthony Johnson.
In 1830 (according to Snopes.com) there were ~319,599 free blacks in the United States. Of that population, 3,775 owned a total of 12,760 slaves. Slavery in the US was an outgrowth of indentured service and a common practice as a cultural norm of the times. Applying a 2020 lense to issues of the 1600s-1800s is hardly an objective view of history.
Native Americans even owned slaves. and, to that topic, they are the group who should really be in national uproar (with ALL of our support) now that momentum for a cause has rightfully forced a nation to look at its biases and question why? They were subjected to damn near genocide. They were persecuted and commonly victims of violent racism as well into the late 1900s. That was every bit as much of a national shame. Yet, we are deep into the tear down and rebrand anything that dealt with slavery phase of the 2000s era of progress. Meanwhile, the Buffalo Soldiers remain a huge crowd favorite for what it meant toward racial progress at the time; nevermind they were fighting an already oppressed Native American. I bet no one is protesting to pull down their monument at Ft. Leavenworth or asking the Army to pull Indian campaign streamers off of Cavalry Unit Colors and Guidons. Or, petitioning to give them back all of their land that we stole (fought and won) as a nation. And, that is the crux of both issues from a historical perspective. We deplore both slavery and the plight of the native American, but few would want to change things historically for all that it has brought us today. That is true because at its heart, the USA is still the greatest nation on earth and clearly capable of positive social growth and opportunity for ALL.
None of the above is to deflect or otherwise excuse the actions of our forefathers, which are truly shameful in today's context. They are directly linked to the TRUE biases in the system that have fed and shaped many of the cultural stereotypes, groupings and issues of today.
All that said, I remain optimistic that we will pull through this together and be stronger for it, more united, and armed with a wider perspective and higher degree of empathy as a nation moving forward. If you account for the timeline of slavery, reconstruction and segregation in the US, I genuinely think it is impressive how far we have progressed as a nation.

Hopefully, we all stop the madness soon but continue a meaningful, productive dialog that leads to action and real change. A USA where all minorities have a voice and platform to advocate for them; one where empathy coupled with thick skins exists, and people can quit walking on eggshells scared to share an opinion or critique a person of a different color; where "racism" is also recognized as a behavior that is not solely conducted by whites AND all forms of it are EQUALLY unacceptable in our society. One where there is no longer a need for equal opportunity advisors and hiring quotas because all have equal opportunity. One where all lives matter and justice is equally distributed. And, this has been a long way around to get back to the original message of the OP, but I hope for one where the immediate emotional release and counter-response of our brothers and sisters of all colors does not result in irreparable harm to artifacts of true historical significance nor continue to widen a divide between peoples and public institutions.
That divide is the real threat to our national security. And, I despise the feeling that political partisanship and politicians' individual greed in an election year are fanning the flames of that divide and even attempting to draw our military into partisan BS to serve nothing but their own selfish agendas.
Posted on 6/13/20 at 9:43 pm to JesusQuintana
I kinda thought there would be a house cleaning after the debacle in 2015. Missouri is way too conservative a state to let shite like that happen for very long. Glad they got their house in order.
Posted on 6/13/20 at 10:09 pm to Kentucker
Honestly I thought there would be a house cleaning too. Missouri still in the SEC somehow.
Posted on 6/13/20 at 10:10 pm to bcoop199
They are still screaming to have it removed, and no one will dare tell them how dumb they are for fear of being canceled.
Posted on 6/14/20 at 10:05 am to JesusQuintana
I wish LSU had the balls to stand up and not cave in to these idiotic demands from people like that.
Posted on 6/14/20 at 10:13 am to JesusQuintana
quote:oh wow, RA'd.
Color
Posted on 6/14/20 at 11:17 am to JesusQuintana
Meanwhile, my school, UA, is doing its best to emulate Mizzou's weakness from five years ago. I hope fellow UA alumni are watching what is going on.
UA can not afford a plummeting enrollment like Mizzou experienced after it capitulated to SJW and Black student demands. Its entire business model is built on maintaining the dramatic enrollment growth it experienced since the early 2000s.
Please don't let Dr. Bell screw the pooch.
UA can not afford a plummeting enrollment like Mizzou experienced after it capitulated to SJW and Black student demands. Its entire business model is built on maintaining the dramatic enrollment growth it experienced since the early 2000s.
Please don't let Dr. Bell screw the pooch.
This post was edited on 6/14/20 at 11:30 am
Posted on 6/14/20 at 12:16 pm to megiddo
quote:
I mean, Thomas Jefferson isn't a Confederate icon, so not surprising. He's on Mount Rushmore for a damn reason, because he's one of the most important people of the early days of the United States of America.
Well I mean, he only RAPED his black female slaves, but other than that, he's a swell guy I suppose.
Posted on 6/14/20 at 12:20 pm to Stingray
quote:
Jefferson loved black people.
I mean really LOVED black people.
YES HE DID. Especially those Female Slaves of his.
Posted on 6/14/20 at 1:03 pm to Che Boludo
I agree with most of what you said. There is context to everything and these decisions should be made mindful of all the particularities of each case.
However I do find it amusing that the one region of the country known for its Christian beliefs is also now making a case for moral relativism.
However I do find it amusing that the one region of the country known for its Christian beliefs is also now making a case for moral relativism.
Posted on 6/14/20 at 1:38 pm to JesusQuintana
Good for you Mizzou. Those opposing Jefferson are historically ignorant. Read his first draft of the Declaration of Independence. This refers to George the Third.
"He has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life and liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. This piratical warfare, the opprobrium of infidel powers, is the warfare of the Christian King of Great Britain. Determined to keep open a market where Men should be bought & sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or restrain this execrable commerce. And that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them, by murdering the people on whom he has obtruded them: thus paying off former crimes committed again the Liberties of one people, with crimes which he urges them to commit against the lives of another.
Jefferson wasn't perfect, but he was a damn sight better than those railing against him. He pledged his life and fortune for liberty.
"He has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life and liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. This piratical warfare, the opprobrium of infidel powers, is the warfare of the Christian King of Great Britain. Determined to keep open a market where Men should be bought & sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or restrain this execrable commerce. And that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them, by murdering the people on whom he has obtruded them: thus paying off former crimes committed again the Liberties of one people, with crimes which he urges them to commit against the lives of another.
Jefferson wasn't perfect, but he was a damn sight better than those railing against him. He pledged his life and fortune for liberty.
Posted on 6/14/20 at 1:39 pm to JesusQuintana
Finally something to be proud of again with the school.
I guess I might have to cut another check for the first time in a long time.
I guess I might have to cut another check for the first time in a long time.
Posted on 6/14/20 at 2:12 pm to Lynxrufus2012
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/14/20 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 6/14/20 at 3:32 pm to MIZ_COU
I don't have the source, but I recall a podcast that effectively debunked the rumor that Jefferson fathered slave children. His brother is a much more likely source of the Jefferson DNA among the family's slaves.
Here is an article that debunks the Jefferson raped his slave rumor. LINK / There is far more evidence that it was Jefferson's younger brother who slept with Sallie Hemmings.
Also, many slaves willingly slept with their masters. Let's not be naive. Of course, many prob thought it would get them a better life, but many of these slave master interactions were mutual.
Here is an article that debunks the Jefferson raped his slave rumor. LINK / There is far more evidence that it was Jefferson's younger brother who slept with Sallie Hemmings.
Also, many slaves willingly slept with their masters. Let's not be naive. Of course, many prob thought it would get them a better life, but many of these slave master interactions were mutual.
This post was edited on 6/14/20 at 3:57 pm
Posted on 6/14/20 at 3:44 pm to CoachDon
Mizzou was surprisingly a bit ahead of the curve here as now other schools are encouraging players to register to vote.
Popular
Back to top
